BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

His Last Vow » Hint into next series » January 17, 2014 10:02 pm

mujie
Replies: 23

Go to post

I think most people would prefer Sherlock over Hobbit, though. Just get another actor to take the place of Morgan. I'm sure nobody will notice.

His Last Vow » I don't like HLV - help?! / Criticism » January 13, 2014 11:02 pm

mujie
Replies: 151

Go to post

Hanka wrote:

I loved the thing with the mind palace. I kinda liked that everyone thought it was files when actually, it was all in Magnussen's head. I didn't like that Sherlock didn't even guess that. We've had the thing with "he says he has something to destroy the whole world with (Moriarty: a code/Magnussen: people's secrets in files) but it's actually much 'simpler' (Moriarty: working with lots of ordinary, influential people/Magnussen: having an enormous mind palace)" already, didn't need that to fool Sherlock again. I didn't like that Sherlock let the villain fool him again in the very same way.

Wow, that was long. Sorry. That kind of hurt my eyes. Not your fault, obviously. It's just the background. But Sherlock did suspect Magnussen had it all in his head. If he had files, Magnussen could be stopped. Piece of cake. Sherlock wouldn't have asked John to bring the gun if he hadn't suspected it.

His Last Vow » What Sherlock did... » January 13, 2014 10:58 pm

mujie
Replies: 375

Go to post

From what I got, when the helicopters came, Sherlock realised something. It was all in Magnussen's mind. Without a proper archive, there was no evidence against him. And so, even though the entire world could know how evil Magnussen is, it would be impossible to bring him down via the justice system. Sherlock made a decision. To save himself or to protect many more people from Magnussen. Because only in that moment could he stop him. Tell me if I'm wrong. I may have misinterpreted something.

Series Four Suggestions & Ideas » Moriarty theories » January 13, 2014 7:55 pm

mujie
Replies: 79

Go to post

It's funny. I think Moriarty's death was the only thing Steven Moffat was very explicit about. With everything else, he's been subtle, sneaky, but he said that he was dead. But if Moriarty really is alive, he knew Sherlock was being sentenced to death. He purposely saved Sherlock's life just now. Which also means he has a government spy. No, a Mycroft spy... It was more likely to be Mycroft I'd think.

By the way, did Moriarty ever make a vow?

Series Three Suggestions & Ideas » Series 3 discussion SPOILER THREAD!!! WARNING!!! SPOILERS!!! » January 10, 2014 11:14 pm

mujie
Replies: 2301

Go to post

Look at Mycroft's face. It doesn't look like Mycroft is threatening him, but looking out for him.

Series Three Suggestions & Ideas » Series 3 discussion SPOILER THREAD!!! WARNING!!! SPOILERS!!! » January 10, 2014 10:56 pm

mujie
Replies: 2301

Go to post

You know, someone on the youtube trailer I think suggested that maybe when Mycroft was talking about going against Magnussen, he meant that Magnussen was as smart as Mycroft. Like, Magnussen is to Mycroft as Moriarty is to Sherlock.

The Sign of Three » The best man speech - full text » January 9, 2014 10:09 pm

mujie
Replies: 31

Go to post

Sorry. Not you. I mean, the text in the post. The best man speech. I can't seem to view it...

Fan Fic » My Own Version of "His Last Vow" - Beginning » January 8, 2014 11:10 pm

mujie
Replies: 2

Go to post

Thanks. (CONT'D) is basically supposed to be used when the same character is speaking, but there's a break or something. It's really weird, though apparently it's script format.

Yeah... I suppose it's probably easier to put it on AO3 (is that archive of our own?)

Fan Fic » My Own Version of "His Last Vow" - Beginning » January 6, 2014 8:51 pm

mujie
Replies: 2

Go to post

So, ever since the Sign of Three, I've been having ideas about episode 3. What will happen? How will it end? etc. And I thought it would be fun to write my own little version of "His Last Vow" in script format. I think it gets more emotion if you're just reading a fan fiction of an episode itself. Anyway, the only Sherlock I know is BBC's Sherlock, so it probably won't have much to do with that. I hope in this beginning, I was able to capture some of the essence of Sherlock and John, and if you guys like it, I'd really want to continue and hopefully finish by Sunday. Give me some feedback! I'd love to hear it. It's been a while since I've written fan fiction. Sorry for the long introduction, here it is:

EDIT: I've put it up on Archive of Our Own now! Tell me what you think: http://archiveofourown.org/works/1127959

The Empty Hearse » The new baddie at the end and why he did it *SPOILERS?* » January 5, 2014 11:03 pm

mujie
Replies: 55

Go to post

Hold on... The guy at the end CAM was watching... Was that Sherlock or Tom?

The Sign of Three » So... I've Got a Theory » January 5, 2014 10:31 pm

mujie
Replies: 57

Go to post

Well, the last part is made up from what I'd expect (speculation), but the rest is more actual theory , though I do hope that nobody does get killed.

The Sign of Three » So... I've Got a Theory » January 5, 2014 10:25 pm

mujie
Replies: 57

Go to post

Not sure if this is the right forum for it, but the only spoiler for episode 3 I know is the title, so I don't think this is really spoilery. I'd guess a few people would have the same idea as me. So here it is...

I think Mary Morstan (or however her name is spelt) is going to die.

So, episode 3 is called His Last Vow, right? Well, Sherlock made his last vow this episode. So seemingly the relationship between the 3/4 is an important factor in the episode. And why would they make it so important... If something doesn't go wrong? All the (2) seasons have ended in cliffhangers so far. So I think someone will die at the end of the episode. Or at least be on the verge of it.

They wouldn't kill off Sherlock. As he said, that's so 2 years ago. I doubt they'd kill John, so that leaves Mary and the baby, right? Well, Mary dies in the canon, doesn't she? So... Yeah. I think most likely she'll get shot or something, and John will be mad at Sherlock and blame him and the cases, but that's just my theory. Hopefully that won't happen, but that's what I think anyway.

The Empty Hearse » The theory he told Anderson - The actual answer?? » January 2, 2014 1:40 pm

mujie
Replies: 445

Go to post

SusiGo wrote:

The needed the corpse to bridge the period of time between Sherlock landing on the airbag, the air-bag being put away and Sherlock being placed and made up. In TRF we/John see "Sherlock" lying on the pavement before John is run down by the bike. 

Hmmm... I suppose. I thought that if most of the makeup was done while he was lying down, why not all of it?

Plus, what about Mycroft? Again, if it was so simple to get rid of the snipers, it would have avoided the whole mess.

The Empty Hearse » The theory he told Anderson - The actual answer?? » January 2, 2014 1:29 pm

mujie
Replies: 445

Go to post

But there is a discrepency. As I've said, if Mycroft could get rid of one of the snipers, why couldn't he get rid of all of them? Also, they could've done without the corpse, yet Sherlock suggested that Molly's part in the plan made it all possible.

The Empty Hearse » The theory he told Anderson - The actual answer?? » January 2, 2014 12:51 pm

mujie
Replies: 445

Go to post

No. I don't think what Sherlock told Phillip was true. You know Sherlock. I'd think he'd always take the simplest option out. Mycroft just used his power to get rid of John's sniper? Why wouldn't he do that for the others as well? It would have saved a lot of trouble. A Sherlock corpse that was replaced by the real Sherlock? First, there was no blood on the corpse, and if Sherlock had the "window-dressing" done on him while he was lying down, he could've just started off there. And in that case, why not just use the corpse. Sherlock wouldn't overcomplicate things, would he? But wait, if he did just want it to be more complicated, Molly still wasn't a key part as the corpse wasn't needed.

In fact, I'm questioning whether that encounter was real or not. I've been trying to figure out when it happened. And it's almost impossible that it happened before Sherlock and John were with the bomb. Sherlock knew it was a plot to blow up parliament, he said so himself, by which time, he had figured most of it out. Sherlock would waste no time. So if that were the case, why would Sherlock visit Anderson of all people. So that leaves 3 possibilities as I see it:

A) It's not real

B) It took place after the events on the train

C) The scene is more important than we think

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum