General Sherlock Discussion » Episodes or scenes you could watch over and over and over again » August 24, 2014 9:57 am |
La Jolie wrote:
... Can Moftiss please give Sherlock a break in S4 and let him practise the science of deduction as l'art pour l'art again, for a change?
I totally agree with you. I really miss it as well!
Favourite scenes... that's tough. Apart from the scenes that have brilliant dialogue, I love all the scenes where music and imagery just fit so perfectly. But it's much harder to point them out...
ASiB, the scene when John is driven to the meetup with Irene. when the car drives towards battersea power station - I could watch that on repeat for ages
ASiP, cab driver and Sherlock discussing serial killing - Sherlocks expressions are so brilliant, and I love the setting
HLV, the mind palace scene, more exact: Sherlock climbing up the stairs
ASiB, Sherlock "calling" the police - because that's just plain sexy, and very nicely set: black suit and gun in front of that white house
TBB, the circus perfomance - I love the atmosphere there
HLV, Appledore, Sherlock going down on his knees... I don't have to say anything to that I think
TEH, when John comes back to 221b, the way the dust comes off of the curtains and reflects in the light... beautiful
and of course in Hounds, the fireplace deduction
It's really hard pointing them out like this. Will watch again, and then I'll have some more to put here, I'm sure. What I realised is that I usually don't rewatch for dialogue, but for images and/or music... I didn't realise my focus was so much on that.
Latest News » Tom Hiddleston nominates Benedict for the Ice Bucket Challenge » August 22, 2014 3:42 pm |
I might have watched that more than once... *mmmm*
Who did he challenge, didn't catch that... (wonder why...)
Meet The Members » Are you trustworthy? » August 19, 2014 2:43 pm |
It's an interesting question. I think it depends what trust implies. Trust me to keep secrets? Trust me with a stranger's toddler? Trust me to support and care? ...
Most people (strangers and friends) do indeed trust me. Some few are afraid of me, and/ or don't believe in my goodwill. I cannot say what either of them sees in me that makes them choose to trust or distrust, but it made me realise that I'm not a 100% trustworthy person for everybody. Which is fine. I like it that way.
Character Analysis » Sherlock and Mary » August 18, 2014 12:46 pm |
After watching S3 again, I feel again like Mary is more a tragic figure than a scheming criminal.
But I was wondering about Johns other attempts at dating. His other women (the sound of that^^) were perfectly normal, teacher, "walk the dog", etc. - or so it would seem. If John - according to Sherlock - is attracted to a certain lifestyle, then that would mean: as long as John had Sherlock, he was fine with dating "ordinary" girls. Only when Sherlock drops out of his life, he goes searching for a not quite so normal girl. Did Sherlock ever realise that? Did he ever consider that, if his opinion about John is true, he (or rather, he not being there) is the very reason John ended up with Mary at all? That Mary filled the hole that Sherlock left behind in more than one way?
I mean, obviously John would have found a woman as soon as Sherlock was out of the way - he was trying hard enough even while Sherlock was still there to distract and sabotage his attempts.
But a woman like Mary?
Sherlock should have forseen that John would run off and try to find a substitute psychopath, or shouldn't he?
Hm, I lost my thought on the way... what was I trying to say? :D
Suggestions, Questions & Technical Help » Technical Help and Questions » August 18, 2014 10:14 am |
I have a question...I'd like to put a link up to this forum, but in a "nice" way. Is there some template that I can just copy? I mean to have a nice little "image link" instead of just an ordinary link. Do you know what I mean? I have no idea what that's called in English? help?
Character Analysis » Sherlock and Mary » August 15, 2014 9:14 am |
SusiGo wrote:
And in HLV she starts by pointing out to John that there are people who do not know Sherlock, i.e. who are not a crazy about him as he is.
I wonder about that. That maybe, in the long run, Mary will try to steer John away from Sherlock. She doesn't seem the kind of person who shares easily.
I'm thinking about the restaurant scene... Sherlock comes back to life, shocks John - and Mary seems really pissed of, because of all the pain he put John through. But on the other hand... yes, she had to live with a sad, broken John, but she had him to herself. In the restaurant scene, I can see honest outrage on her part. But she doesn't know Sherlock at that point. She doesn't know how he affects John.
And then I start to wonder... is she honestly glad for John that Sherlock is back? Does the initially like Sherlock because he is like he is (I really wonder what image she had of him before knowing him), or is she already playacting? She tries to talk John round... why does she do that? For Johns benefit? For Sherlocks? Has she got her own intentions?
I don't get Mary. She is a Severus Snape indeed, kind of. But I fear in an inverted way.
Character Analysis » Sherlock and Mary » August 15, 2014 8:58 am |
For me it comes all down to the shooting - at that point, it doesn't matter to me anymore if Mary initially liked Sherlock or if he liked her.
If it was a shot Sherlock could have easily survived, all fine.
But as we are shown it, Sherlock could have EASILY lost his life. It's not surgery, it's luck... and Mary can't have known Sherlock that well to trust he would pull through. Because he pulls through only because a) he falls down the right direction b) knows that shock will kill him and manages (!) not to let that happen c) is strong enough to hold on long enough for that ambulance to arrive.
That's many chances Mary is taking there. And I'm pretty sure, if Sherlock would have died, John wouldn't have forgiven Mary... loosing Sherlock again, after just having him back? His own wife, who knows EXACTLY how miserable and depressed John was during the time he thought Sherlock dead, would put John through all that again? That's not love for me.
I agree Mary was in a difficult situation, and I understand she didn't want John to know. But she willingly sacrifices Sherlock to keep her relationship with John safe. I have no idea why John forgives her. I'm sure he loves her, but would I happily spend my life with somebody who - worst case scenario - killed my best friend? I don't think so. Mary is afraid, alright, but she could have tried talking to John, to anybody, she could have chosen so many different routes.
I think Sherlock accepts Mary way of dealing with the Magnusson situation because he is equally unable to solve a situation in a normal, sane way (speak of jumping off roofs and not telling your best friend).
I think Sherlock understands Mary, but I don't think he likes her very much. Mary I'm not sure about. I think she likes Sherlock, but she is totally unable to act accordingly. John is very right - Sherlock and Mary are the similar ones here.
Sherlock Games » In Sherlock's Pants » August 10, 2014 2:08 pm |
Safe and Sound in Sherlock's pants
?! hehe
A Study In Pink » The cabbie and moriarty had one thing in common.. » July 28, 2014 1:30 am |
Liberty wrote:
It seems such a silly, pointless risk to take.
Yes. But he's an idiot, to quote John
Series Four Suggestions & Ideas » Baby Watson (spoilers!) » July 28, 2014 1:01 am |
I don't think it was only because of the missing antagonist. When I think of Hounds, that was for me a great episode with the right "feeling", and it hadn't got any Moriarty in it It has a wonderful Sherlock-John dynamic, regardless of villains. Just saying....
But I agree that it might be indeed a valid reason among others - the episodes feel more "complete" when there is a good old-fashioned villain.... and it's true for the overall story arch, if I judge by series and not by episodes.
Sherlock Quizzes » Details game: Where is this picture from? » July 28, 2014 12:55 am |
I'd love to, but I cannot find the thread again that explains how to upload pictures... so same problem here ;)
The Blind Banker » John saves Sherlock's Life? » July 24, 2014 10:23 pm |
I think it's all about the warning. I don't think the strangling is an attempt to kill Sherlock - obviously the guys can shoot if they want to (Soo lin's death), so why take the trouble with the strangling, when they're fine with shooting the guy in the appartment and later Soo Lin. I agree they want to keep Sherlock in the game at this point. I think John shouting just tells the attacker that there is somebody else around and that it's time to leave unseen.
Series Three Reviews » Series 1/2 and series 3 - a comparison » July 24, 2014 10:14 pm |
tonnaree wrote:
Harriet wrote:
And next scene: Sherlock and John ....
![]()
Snogging against a wall?
No idea what's going on in this thread, just wanted to shout a short "YES" to the above and then I'm gone again
Sherlock Quizzes » Details game: Where is this picture from? » July 24, 2014 10:12 pm |
Oh, this seems to be a fun game, but I'm absolutely rubbish with details.
Wild guess: kidnapping scene, childrens bedroom, TRF? (I haven't figured out how to make screenshots, and I definitely should pay more attention to details next time I'm watching!)
Series Four Suggestions & Ideas » Baby Watson (spoilers!) » July 24, 2014 10:02 pm |
SolarSystem wrote:
For me the show worked best when it was Sherlock and John in 221B, solving crimes and having their domestic bliss from time to time. That's what the voice in my head is saying when I think of "Sherlock": Sherlock and John in 221B.
We quite agree then So back to 221b with everybody who belongs there - and for me that's 2 people, not 3 or 4
Well, about the changes and new directions of the show... I liked that series 3 was different. I really liked it (or to be honest, rather learned to like it). But I don't need it again, not in such a fundamental way. There was a substance in series 1 and 2, something like the core of the show, an unchangeable beat that kept everything smooth. In series 3 they somehow upset that, it was like music that suddenly changes the key it's written in. I have the feeling, if series 4 pushes further, the show will loose its... whatever it is. Identity? Integrity? I cannot describe this any better, but it's like they upset the water of a pond, which is a good thing, but after a storm, there's need for quiet... and not for another wild ride. My opinion. But I think we discussed that in another thread already, so I'm shutting up here
back to baby-topic :D
A Study In Pink » The cabbie and moriarty had one thing in common.. » July 24, 2014 9:47 pm |
Liberty wrote:
I think Moriarty would have been disappointed if Sherlock killed himself with the pill. Maybe it was a test - was he a worthy opponent?
Yes, I thought so too. I only wonder if Moriarty ever got to know how close Sherlock was to taking the pill. The cabbie couldn't tell him anymore, and Sherlock and John were the only ones who knew (John definitely knows, he is absolutely sure Sherlock risked his life there on purpose, and Sherlock doesn't deny it). I first thought Moriarty found out through the cabbie that Sherlock is bored, and easily tempted with dangerous situations. But I'm not sure how Moriarty would have known the details. Neither Sherlock nor John would have told the press or anybody how close it really was, because it would show Sherlock's weakness to the world. This is all based of course on the assumption that Sherlock really would have taken the pill. I personally thought he would have, after watching the episode a few times. He wants to prove he is clever.
I think he is more in control later on in the show - he maybe realises that this is his weak spot: the need to prove he is clever, the knowledge that he will go to extremes to keep the upper hand in the end, even risking his life (or the life of his friends in this case, which is the same thing imo).
A Study In Pink » The cabbie and moriarty had one thing in common.. » July 24, 2014 7:40 pm |
I'd think Moriarty would choose people who were "his taste"... so people that appeal to him in their way of thinking. He chose the cabbie to work for him, and he chose Sherlock... I think Moriarty wouldn't work with people who don't "entertain" him in their wicked ways. So I think it's not coincidence the cabbie and Moriarty like playing similar games.
Maybe Moriarty was also a bit annoyed that Sherlock didn't kill himself but John shot the cabbie. Maybe he wanted to do it better, and chose a similar scenario.
In case Moriarty is really dead (which I hope), it is indeed a repeated scenario which is a funny thought. People who force Sherlock to commit suicide end up dead in this show... and I can see similarites to CAM there, too, even if it's not a suicide Sherlock is facing, but a trial. Sherlock is kind of good getting out of tight situations... and the other side often doesn't survive it.
Series Four Suggestions & Ideas » Baby Watson (spoilers!) » July 23, 2014 11:55 pm |
All I ever think when hearing the word "baby", is "no". In my head there is a voice saying "no" to this baby all the time. Sorry.
But I suppose the question is not what I want to happen, but what could happen with the baby. And I really can imagine they will keep the baby in the show, which will make me struggle with liking series 4. And after already struggling with series 3, I'm really not looking forward to it.
If it was my script, I'd write a miscarriage into it. It's cruel, but it does happen in real life, it keeps Mary in the show but not the baby, and John... he'll cope. I'm no fan of this baby idea, but I'm pretty sure writers had it all plotted out before they made Mary pregnant. So I'll wait for the surprise, and if I've learned anything about the show in series 3, it's that I don't have to like all of it, because others still will.
Uh, bad topic. I think I won't write about it any more, it makes me... uneasy and dissatisfied.
The Empty Hearse » Violence at the reunion » July 23, 2014 3:22 pm |
I've thought about the repeated hitting, and yes... I can see that hitting Sherlock more than once is quite bad.
I think also the feeling of betrayal has a role here. Sherlock gives information to John, yes, but it's "everybod knew but you", and that's a really cruel thing to say to John who suffered so much. I think maybe John feels the instinct to hurt Sherlock equally much, and words just aren't enough again - how to find words that cut so deep that they equal the pain (and guilt!) John must have felt during Sherlocks absence?
I think John manages better when he tells Sherlock that he definitely won't go with him on cases - that's payback, that's giving back the feeling of being left out to Sherlock. But even that - I don't think it makes up for anything John went through, and I think the rest of it... the emotion that is still there after trying to verbally sort things, it has to go somewhere - and John hits Sherlock again. I really would like to, but I cannot come up with a different acting on Johns part for the scene. Maybe the writers didn't as well?
Maybe I cannot see Sherlock so much as a victim here. John was telling him from the very beginning not to stand up to Moriarty, not to get involved... and Sherlock got into it, played the game until the point of no return. That is I think part of Johns point of view. That's what John doesn't get - and it shows again when they're underground, how John shouts at Sherlock "and you did not call the police!"
Sherlock is suffering from his own decisions, and John refuses to take responsibility, that's what I see. Compassion, understanding, yes, but no responsibility. John will have compassion when he sees what Sherlock went through, and he will understand why Sherlock had to jump (to save him, John), but Sherlock got himself into trouble there, and why should John say "hey Sherlock, it's okay, you're just a victim like everyone else, I forgive you".
When he finally forgives Sherlock, it's out of friendship - it's not
Benedict's Press » Benedict is gonna be in Madame Tussaud's » July 22, 2014 11:29 pm |
Never been to Madame Tussaud's - never wanted to.
Reconsidering now.