BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

The Hounds Of Baskerville » Redbeard Previsited » April 15, 2016 10:36 am

Harriet
Replies: 30

Go to post

At least we are shown a dog in both episodes. And these are the dogs I'm talking about.
The quotes I introduced this thread with of course also hint towards another meaning.

"You'd started to piece things together, remember what really happened here that night. It wasn't an  animal, was it, Henry? Not a monster. A man."

"You couldn't cope. You were just a child, so you rationalised it into something very different. But then you started to remember, so you had to be stopped; driven out of your mind so that no-one would believe a word that you said."

The Hounds Of Baskerville » Redbeard Previsited » April 15, 2016 10:13 am

Harriet
Replies: 30

Go to post

He was not allowed / did not allow himself to struggle too much with what happened back then.

Susi pointed out how Sherlock's character developed between the two scenes. The fortress had begun to wobble, he tried to keep it stable, it doesn't work.

Yes, right before John's wedding.

The Hounds Of Baskerville » Redbeard Previsited » April 15, 2016 9:39 am

Harriet
Replies: 30

Go to post

Following up on Susi's thoughts, if Sherlock had started opening up emotionally in that episode, we might expect some contradictory behaviour, too. Like a longing for Redbeard's comfort and a dread of more death experience.

The Hounds Of Baskerville » Redbeard Previsited » April 15, 2016 9:34 am

Harriet
Replies: 30

Go to post

Vhanja: That could show how much he repressed what he had felt then, a sign of how big the trauma was actually.

The Hounds Of Baskerville » Redbeard Previsited » April 15, 2016 9:05 am

Harriet
Replies: 30

Go to post

Danielle80 wrote:

If Redbeard would be a sign or symbol of a traumatic incident, why did Sherlock thought about him as he wanted to calm down? Wouldn't be the risk that he was upset about his dog or the traumatic incident greater in this dangerously situation? I can not see how the dog could be a symbol for something beautyful and simultaneous for a traumatic incident of his childhood.

I also think the answer is because it was both to him. Redbeard has two sides, his life and his death, both in their particular important meaning to Sherlock.

Do you think, Danielle, that there is no link between Hound and Redbeard?
We have several text evidence that hint to such link.

Martin Freeman » Favourite Martin pics » April 15, 2016 8:06 am

Harriet
Replies: 3564

Go to post

Vhanja wrote:

I would have to agree with Besley here. I have very few limits regarding Johnlock jokes, fic tags and smut, but I draw a strict line with anything that has to do with, or just hinting to, shipping actors. 
 

And I'm glad that nobody here actually suggested or supports such ...
 

The Hounds Of Baskerville » Redbeard Previsited » April 14, 2016 9:03 pm

Harriet
Replies: 30

Go to post

... and after that I discovered this little meta about the Hound (not) being put down, and Redbeard and Sherlock:

http://shinysherlock.tumblr.com/post/74502312820/wsswatson-the-hounds-of-baskerville-sherlock

The Hounds Of Baskerville » Redbeard Previsited » April 14, 2016 8:53 pm

Harriet
Replies: 30

Go to post

There seem to be parallels between Sherlock and Redbeard, and Henry and the Hound.
It might be a possible explanation of Redbeard foreshadowing here.

"You'd started to piece things together, remember what really happened here that night. It wasn't an  animal, was it, Henry? Not a monster. A man."

"You couldn't cope. You were just a child, so you rationalised it into something very different. But then you started to remember, so you had to be stopped; driven out of your mind so that no-one would believe a word that you said."




edit: thread title

Character Analysis » Mary – the subject of discussion » April 12, 2016 1:48 pm

Harriet
Replies: 5171

Go to post

SolarSystem wrote:

Where no Consulting Detective and his Blogger have gone before.

"boldly go where no ..." 
 

Character Analysis » Mary – the subject of discussion » April 12, 2016 7:18 am

Harriet
Replies: 5171

Go to post

besleybean wrote:

But finally: I prefer passion on a lead character and major plot line, to(for instance) hair styles!

One probably needs to understand that hair style, clothing etc. is also a part of a character set up 
 

Character Analysis » Mary – the subject of discussion » April 12, 2016 7:17 am

Harriet
Replies: 5171

Go to post

nakahara wrote:

I just shup up about a theme that obviously grated on others nerves. Because it was pointed up to me during weekend that my posts may sound overly negative to some members, I tried to apologise in advance that I might sound bitchy when posting these - but even that came out wrong, for obviously it sounded like some veiled salty sneer at others.
So I considered it wiser to stop adding more petrol to the fire in the situation and stop for the moment.
I´ll certainly try to be more careful with my words in the future, but of course, I can´t always predict how my post will sound to others, so please, indulge with me. I just like to discuss problems, but personal attacks and infighting are really not my thing, so if somewhat sounds overly sarcastic to you, please, point it out to me right away, so that I can avoid it.

It's ok, nakahara, thanks for this 
 

Character Analysis » Mary – the subject of discussion » April 11, 2016 9:37 pm

Harriet
Replies: 5171

Go to post

nakahara wrote:

Sorry, if you find my opinions annoying, but I would rather voice my thoughts with sincerity than pretend the artificial perkiness I don´t feel. I joined the forum to share my joys or doubts and that would be rather impossible if I held my opinions to myself.

Pls stay down to earth, nakahara. I hope you don't assume pretension of artificial perkiness with any of us, otherwise some might feel hurt.
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum