BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

The Empty Hearse » Reunion - do you think... » January 31, 2014 11:35 pm

Willow wrote:

besleybean wrote:

I agree on this one.
Least I think I do.
I tend to think more Sherlock just wanted to protect John...tho no doubt he got on faster without him.

Sorry, I was replyig  to your previous post.

I'm sure that there was an element of protection of him as well; I have absolutely no doubt that Sherlock was completely genuine in his Best Man's speech about his relationship with John. But one of the strengths of the show is the way that they make it clear that even the heroes have flaws; these are not cardboard cut outs but (almost) real people
 

John might have insisted on going into hiding with Sherlock. But I do think there's a bit of a contradiction between John's being "the bravest, kindest, wisest," etc, and his having a tendency to lash out into violence. 

In some adaptations, Watson is turned into kind of a saint...we don't need that necessarily, but there should be a contrast between him and Holmes...he should have good qualities Holmes doesn't have. John with his tendency explode almost seems more...I don't want to say psychopathic, but in some ways more anti-social, bad at getting along with people. And it would be scary to be the roommate of someone like that. The original Watson never hit Holmes; he was at his most violent when protecting Holmes.

The original Sherlock wasn't very social, certainly, and his original verse, he stood out. Now it seems like other characters are too much like him.

The Sign of Three » The best man speech - full text » January 31, 2014 2:02 am

I think the biggest problem with the best man speech was how freaking LONG it was. But I actually though that most of the seemingly-rather-inappropriate comments were self-deprecating in a cute way and a way that ultimately showed how much he loved John.

Series Three Suggestions & Ideas » Would it have helped or hurt Season 3... » January 31, 2014 1:45 am

...if Sherlock had come back with Moriarty and his network gone...but his own name not completely cleared? And that had been something he still had to accomplish through the episodes?

 

The Reichenbach Fall » One more miracle » January 31, 2014 12:20 am

besleybean wrote:

Well Sherlock's gonna give John his miracle, so he damn well better appreciate it.

This was kind of my reaction when I saw how angry John was in The Empty Hearse. Thank you for wording it so well!

I wonder if when he stalks off, he ever really intends to be "done" with Sherlock, or at what point he decides to go back?

As for the "miracle" comment...I too found the use of "one more" very telling...to me it suggested that John considers many things Sherlock has done to be miracles. And he doesn't ask a Higher Power for the miracle of Sherlock being alive...he asks Sherlock himself for the miracle.

But curing John's limp is definitely one that stands out for me, because I noticed the religous symbolism (and started a whole different thread on that.) Saving Irene was kind of miraculous, too (but John may not know about that.)

Re: "Don't be dead," I'm sure it must have at least OCCURRED to John at some point that Sherlock could be faking...or perhaps could be capable of a "resurrection" in a more truly miraculous sense.

After watching the flashback (real or not) in TEH, I realized that "It's a trick. It's all magic trick," was code for, "I'm not really going to commit suicide, I'm just going to do a magic trick."

And, Sherlock being Sherlock, it is POSSIBLE that he rationalized that by saying that phrase, he HAD told John that truth. But that doesn't get him off the hook, because he knows John isn't the deducer that he is; he should have realized John wouldn't get it.

Actually, I think Sherlock's pulling off the faked death was a bit of a miracle! He could have been injured jumping into the air bag...someone could have seen him hit the air bag...many things could have gone wrong.

This fanfic was written before the BBC series existed. It is based on canon, but it explores the idea of Watson coping by "pretending" that Holmes is coming back: http://moustache-wax.livejournal.com/7396.html

Fan Videos » The wedding of Sherlock and John (TSoT AU) » January 31, 2014 12:07 am

MahnSherlolly03 wrote:

Hmmm...I think it very interesting how little had to be changed to make the story work. It shows just how close in the original episode that it was to being a three-way wedding."

My reaction exactly. 

The Empty Hearse » The theory he told Anderson - The actual answer?? » January 31, 2014 12:04 am

To me, this makes perfect sense. I think by stating that he wanted to consider Sherlock's return as a miracle, John expressed that he had truely forgiven Sherlock. Because there's nothing to be angry about when someone has just "given" you a miracle, is there?

And, if it's a miracle, it doesn't have to be the result of an intricate scheme that involved a lot of lying to John.

And frankly, even if the third explanation we saw was the real one, it WAS a bit of a miracle...that everything went off as planned and no one suspected you. And you could say that regardless of Sherlock's method for jumping and surviving...it was a miracle he pulled it off.

Because it's possible to jump into an airbag or safety net and still be hurt.

Series Three Reviews » Review of S3 on Decoding the Subtext Blog (Blog focused on Johnlock) » January 30, 2014 11:52 pm

Nekosmuse also complains a lot about how women are portrayed, both by Moffit and Gattis and in canon - some of which I agree with, but she considers the original, canon, Irene Adler a "deplorable character" that shows Doyle's misogyny...but that involves taking the King's description of Irene and her agenda at face value. I think Irene is pretty clearly shown in that story NOT to be a villain, a blackmailer, or a criminal...and perhaps not even much of an adventuress. I wrote about that in the Book Club thread for SCAN.

The Sign of Three » Why did Sherlock leave the wedding early, looking so sad and dejected? » January 30, 2014 9:18 pm

Swanpride wrote:

But this were not the flowers of the bride...well...perhaps it was, in a way.

Seriously this whole thing looks like a threesome wedding, and not just because John and Sherlock turned up in partnerlook. First Mary, John and Sherlock are greeting the guests, with the bridesmaids behind them, then Sherlock and John tell each other how much they are in love, then Sherlock makes a lifetime vow and then he throws "his" boquet.

What do you mean by the bolded ("partnerlook"?)

I think with Johnlock goggles on, you can actually looking at the early-leaving either way: on the one hand, it could have been because it hurt him to watch John dance with someone else (and think of what he and Mary would do later on).

On the other hand, if he had stayed at the wedding, he'd be where he could see John, and perhaps talk to John some more.

And if we still go with the theory that he has Asperger's, being at that kind of event and doing his best to be social when it doesn't come naturally, could be just plain tiring.

The Sign of Three » John and Sherlock Drunk » January 30, 2014 9:16 pm

I didn't remember until later: isn't Harry's drinking a cause of estrangement between her and John? Which implies he has a problem with drinking, or at least, is concerned about the effects of it.

And I also didn't think of it before but: after all of that trouble Moriarty went to to undermine Sherlock's reputation...and just when it's been restored...what if those clients he had on the "stag party night" spread the word? He'll get a reputation for being drunk on the job. Not the same thing Moriarty was trying to make him look like, but he didn't come off as particularly competent detective. And customers do talk...

In canon, Sherlock Holmes sometimes used cocaine (it wasn't illegal then) as a substitute for mental stimulation when he didn't have a case. He would never have allowed any kind of substance to interfere with his mental sharpness when on a case. It was the major thing Watson argued with him about, and perhaps the only area where Watson felt he knew better than Holmes.

General Sherlock Discussion » You know you're obsessed with Sherlock when... » January 28, 2014 1:29 am

When you're not in front of a computer, you make notes on a little pad or sticky-note about thoughts you've had about anything Sherlock-related that you haven't posted yet.

When somebody leaves a message at your office that displays their lack of social skills, and you find it funny and go, "Sounds like Sherlock."

When you think of looking something up as "Sherlock-ing around for it." Or, in the case of legal research, if what you find helps your case/cause and you think of it as "Sherlock-ing" or "out-Sherlock-ing" the other side.

The Sign of Three » Johnlock » January 28, 2014 1:14 am

I confess I wasn't absolutely sure what to make of the "not the first" line, given that we're supposed to believe John was never having sex with Sherlock. So, in his case, first what?

Mary wasn't the first bed-partner, and Sherlock wasn't the first brooding, loner male he made friends with?

Actually, we were led to believe in the first two seasons that John was very alone in the world...but unlike Sherlock, he's had other "bromances" of sorts, or some kind of male friendships? I guess in the army he'd get to be close to the other guys.

The Sign of Three » Favourite quotes » January 27, 2014 11:43 pm

"Sorry about that last one."

Wasn't Sherlock saying John had been through many losses, and "that last one," was Sherlock's supposed death?

The Sign of Three » First Thoughts... » January 27, 2014 11:33 pm

Seems like a real change of tone from the rest of the series, including (and perhaps especially) TEH. Much lighter and funnier, I mean. Sherlock has never been nicer, I don't think, or funnier, or more social, than he was here. 

I was pretty surprised that the wedding (reception) took up so much of the episode. I thought it would be mostly rushing to solve a case in time for the wedding, with the wedding at the very end.

And the solving of the crime felt true to canon, somehow. I know the overall story is nothing like canon, but the way we watched Sherlock go through cases, and the cases themselves, were more like canon than some episodes with a lot of physical confrontation and explosions. The motive was like something out of canon, too.

As obnoxious as that long of a best man speech would be in real life, I thought the way the case was woven into the speech and wedding was pretty brilliant.

I knew Sherlock was going to say that John made him a better person. Initially I felt like, "but John really couldn't do that...he has too many demons of his own." But after this episode, I bought it.

It almost felt like a happy enough ending to be season or series finale.

The Sign of Three » Johnlock » January 27, 2014 11:28 pm

ancientsgate wrote:

Johnlock forever. Done. Nothing that happens or doesn't happen, whoever comes along or doesn't come along, nothing will ever change the love between those two men. With or without sex, the two of them have the deepest of connections and always will, and to me, that's true Johnlock. *happy sigh*

There were some delicious Johnlock moments in this episode. I could kiss Moffat for writing what he did, not just Sherlock-John interactions but also showing us a more human, more likeable, funnier Sherlock, one who doesn't always come up with answers to every damned thing, seemingly out of the ether. I LIKE this Sherlock way more than any they've shown us up to now, and he and John are just lovely together--  They always were, but now it's....deeper.

The best man speech was totally too long, disjointed, silly and almost stoopid in parts-- like something out of a slapstick vaudeville skit. But at the heart of it, Sherlock's esteeming his friend, using the L word to describe what he felt for him, and then John pushing back his chair and reaching out to hug him, OMG, I cried real tears.

I cried again when Sherlock played the violin while J/M danced.

And when the three of them were discussing the pregnancy, at one point, John reached up and cupped his hand around the back of Sherlock's neck.  It's okay, mate, the three of us will get through this, together....  both of their faces were beautiful pieces of work.

Love, love, love...   it makes the world go 'round, and yes, it comes in all shapes and sizes. Johnlock forever. Done.
 

I could actually imagine John and Mary having an...understanding about Sherlock...that would keep the Johnlock ship from sinking.

The Empty Hearse » Reunion - do you think... » January 27, 2014 11:11 pm

It's almost as if John makes the best of both worlds: he forgives Sherlock, he goes back to being friends with him and following him around on cases. But he also follows through with marrying Mary. 

He doesn't say, "Now that Sherlock is back, I'm going to stay single so I can put him first." And Sherlock, much to his credit, never seems to ask for or expect that. He says his "What life, I've been away," line before he knows of Mary's existence. But he never says, "Why get married now that I'm back?"

So, John does go back to his friendship with Sherlock, but in a sense, he moves on as well...moves on from the relationship he had with Sherlock pre-Reichenbach, where Sherlock was his whole life... to a more...balanced? approach. Which could be kind of emotional defense mechanism: from now on, if Sherlock disappears, or something really happens to him, or there's some kind of split between them, John won't have lost everything. (He thinks.)

Well, we'll see because I still have to see HLV.

The Sign of Three » Guess who wrote the best man speech? » January 27, 2014 11:01 pm

There are two canon stories which Holmes (supposedly) wrote himself.

From the first of these, The Blanched Solider, written when "the good Watson had deserted [Holmes] for a wife":

"Speaking of my old friend and biographer, I would take this opportunity to remark that if I burden myself with a companion in my various little inquiries it is not done out of sentiment or caprice, but it is that Watson has some remarkable characteristics of his own to which in his modesty he has given small attention amid his exaggerated estimates of my own performances."

That line was used in the speech, the ending part updated to, "...because of his obsession with me."


But in canon, Holmes actually goes on to say that Watson is useful because he can't predict anything Holmes figures out or does. The speech is considerably more sincerely complimentary of John.

The Sign of Three » Sherlock and Sholto » January 27, 2014 9:27 pm

gently69 wrote:

And it is also the first time IMO, that Sherlock really seems jealous of someone who is near John.

That's interesting. And he's more jealous of a man (Sholto) than of a woman (Mary.)

He never had any lines like, "Wait, a minute, John, I'm back, you don't need to marry her now."

Both John and Sherlock wanted to save Sholto's life, but it seemed to me there was some modicum of empathy for Small, too. I mean, there wasn't a big, "Oh, what a desipicable criminal," reaction. Small's motive spoke to the same theme: perhaps he and his brother had a relationship much like Sherlock's and John's (well, without the Johnlock-y implications, of course.) But in the brotherly sense. We know John and Sherlock would kill to protect each other.

The Sign of Three » John and Sherlock Drunk » January 27, 2014 7:48 pm

I didn't get the impression that it would be the start of doing a lot of drinking in the future; I got the impression neither of them liked being drunk (which, in Sherlock's case, especially, meant less in control than usual, and it interfered with his crime-solving).

The Sign of Three » Johnlock » January 27, 2014 5:19 pm

ancientsgate wrote:

besleybean wrote:

I covered this on another thread!
Sherlock said he had been giving John dancing lessons.
John said; yes, behind closed curtains at Baker Street.  Mrs Hudson caught us once, wonder how those rumours started,

I didn't get any of that. Can't wait to get my DVDs in a month or so, soon as they're released here in the US. Love those subtitles....

I didn't get it either. I definitely have some problems hearing the dialogue.  But oh, this is a marriage of "three" all right...

We have to wonder: did Sherlock teach  John to dance JUST for the purpose of practicing for the wedding...or were they...practicing...before. Sherlock refers to the rumors about them, and certainly those rumors were in existence even before he disappeared.

Did we have any indication before this that Sherlock could dance? Or play the violin, for that matter? (That one is from canon, and he has been known in canon to serenade his Watson, sometimes even to sleep. But I don't think he's ever danced in canon...hasn't been to enough social events.)

The Empty Hearse » The theory he told Anderson - The actual answer?? » January 27, 2014 5:15 pm

lisa wrote:

Can we address the change in Sherlock? He seems friendlier more humble, which is all explainable, he had so many of his friends come through and help him. I really had to get used to that though, but what is with the ladies man routine. He is having sex now? He was "the virgin" just a few episodes ago. Now don't get me wrong, I loved it, but I didn't expect it. My secret fantasy always was that after he saved Irene Adler  they went off to some exoctic hotel and she "Thanked" him. So now I see that she probably did and taught him a few things. RoWWWWWW! Wish they made that into an episode! LOL!

Under the "Irene's Cameo" thread under the Sign of Three threads, somebody posted that Benedict said this happened! I asked for the source...

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum