BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

Martin Freeman » Wild Target » May 26, 2015 11:14 pm

Freeman's character speaks at about 1:18 in this fan's "best of" video -- note that you might want to stop after that, because there are some spoilery bits later on (especially toward the end).
 

Martin Freeman » Wild Target » May 26, 2015 10:55 pm

Well, he's not playing John Watson, that's for sure!  So yes, this character's speech is different, but that may or may not have anything to do with those teeth -- same goes for Mr. Cumberbatch, since I believe he sometimes has a slight lisp in real life.
 

Martin Freeman » Wild Target » May 26, 2015 7:25 pm

My impression is that he was actually wearing fake teeth.  They did a good job of it, so that if I'd never seen Martin Freeman in anything else, I wouldn't have thought they were particularly odd.  But I believe they're bigger than his own teeth, perhaps intended to make him look "predatory."  The first few times I watched this movie, I had a bit of trouble looking directly at him -- like "what is wrong with this picture?"

But yes, he's wonderful in this role.  Looks like he was having a lot of fun with it!

And I agree, Russell, Nativity is also a lot of fun, especially with the tiny bit of singing and dancing that Mr. Freeman does.
 

Meet The Members » MEMBERS POLL: What's your age? » February 23, 2013 8:36 pm

I wonder the same thing sometimes, but in my case it's not so much that I prefer the television or the internet, it's just that it's becoming harder and harder to find any "real people" to do things with.  Maybe they're all at home watching tv and surfing the web?

A Study In Pink » The Pilot » February 23, 2013 8:27 pm

I'm hoping that they actually pick up immediately after "Reichenbach," and show us what Sherlock and John are each doing during their separation.

MNRebecca wrote:

erunyauve wrote:

I'm happy to watch them paint the wall in 221B...

That was a joke in the pilot, right?  A reference to the title?  A study in pink?  Because the flat is where John and Sherlock do their thinking and writing, like a boarding school study?

The episode title was a play on Conan Doyle's novel title, A Study in Scarlet.  But now that you mention it, there are other possibilities for humor there.  I don't offhand recall much "pink" in their flat, but it was red in the pilot, so maybe it averages out kind of pink!

Martin Freeman » Funny pics of Martin: Is everyman Martin Freeman actually EVERY man? » January 13, 2013 5:09 am

Good grief, that piece is hilarious!  The sort of thing Dave Barry would write if he were British.  Though come to think of it, if he were British, he would have a British sense of humour (i.e., instead of those juvenile booger jokes, he would tell bogey jokes).

Martin Freeman » Martin Freeman: 5 Awesome Performances And 5 That Sucked » December 26, 2012 8:14 pm

Oh, this is funny -- my husband and I were just having the same conversation.  He says last time he checked (fairly recently), he hadn't been able to find any region-free blu-ray players.  If you find one, please let me know!

At this point, I'm not entirely certain what advantage there would be in getting a blu-ray player.  What advantages do you see?  I have a vague impression that there tends to be more extra stuff on the blu-ray discs, but I haven't really checked into that, and certainly not lately.  Do you happen to know?

In general, any DVD or blu-ray player would suffice, because most things are available in both formats, and in both region 1 and region 2 -- eventually.  But I'm imagining this sort of situation:  Season 3 of Sherlock becomes available in region 2 several months before it's available here, AND the blu-ray edition has 'way more features.  If all I have is a region-free DVD player and a region 1 blu-ray player, do I get to enjoy the region 2 DVD right away (and miss a lot of the goodies), or do I have to wait several months for the region 1 blu-ray?  Gaaah!

Martin Freeman » Hobbit articles » December 26, 2012 7:45 am

Hey, Morton -- both of those links worked just fine!

It's interesting that Freeman describes Bilbo as four feet tall, which makes him a relatively tall hobbit by Tolkien's standards.  While watching the movie, I thought it looked like Bilbo might be something like 60% of Gandalf's height (around 3.5 feet), rather than Tolkien's nominal 50%.  I suppose that made the scaling tricks easier, and was therefore more practical.

Martin Freeman » Favourite Martin pics » December 21, 2012 10:45 pm

whistling in the dark wrote:

"Part of my interest in acting, and in acting Bilbo specifically, is showing fear", Martin told us. "I don't believe it when I am not showing vulnerability on the screen or on stage. That is one of the best traits an actor can have. Because is honest. In fact, if it isn't honest then it's just a waste of time".

Freeman's ability to show vulnerability (and other aspects of honesty) is one big reason that his characters seem so real to me, and appeal to me so much.  This quote confirms that he's not doing it just because the scripts say to -- he feels that it's important, which delights me because that means there will be more of it.

Martin Freeman » Martin Freeman: 5 Awesome Performances And 5 That Sucked » December 21, 2012 9:51 pm

Russell -- All of the items on my list (except for The Hobbit, of course) are available on DVD.  Several of them have to be ordered from the UK, but that's a simple matter, thanks to Amazon.  I'm reasonably sure that all of the DVDs are subtitled (which I also find very helpful), though I'm not home at the moment, so can't absolutely swear to that.  And yes, that's one drawback to YouTube (that and the smaller screen size).  So a region-free DVD player is the way to go if you've got the space and the money for an extra piece of equipment.

Hey, Carroll!! -- I've only seen one or two of your posts before, probably because I post mostly here in the Martin Freeman section (since I'm also on another Sherlock-related forum for the other stuff) -- so I think we've just been missing each other.  Let us know what you think of The Hobbit!

Martin Freeman » Martin Freeman: 5 Awesome Performances And 5 That Sucked » December 20, 2012 11:28 am

Bruiser is definitely worth it.  Freeman is hilarious, plus he does things in there (e.g., an American accent) that I haven't seen him do anywhere else so far.  Last time I looked someone had all of his bits (which are the funniest anyhow) on You Tube.

If you'd rather have the DVD, and if you have some way of playing Region 2 DVDs (e.g., if your laptop has a region-free player), by far the cheapest way to get Bruiser is from Amazon.co.uk -- when I bought it a few months ago, they had it for -- oh great, can't read my own writing -- no more than 16 pounds (about $24, plus shipping, which wasn't all that much), while on Amazon.com it was $51 (with free shipping -- whoopie!!).  If you prefer watching things on your regular tv, you can also buy a region-free player to hook up to it.  We have one, and it's great to be able to watch things that aren't available on Region 1 DVDs.

Another use for a region-free player is that assuming PBS drags their heels again on Season 3 of Sherlock, you can pre-order the DVD from Amazon.co.uk and they will ship it as soon as the third episode airs in the UK.  We did that for Season 2, and had it in early February, whereas it didn't play on PBS till May!  Besides which, the PBS version has had 8 minutes chopped out.  Per episode.

Martin Freeman » Martin Freeman: 5 Awesome Performances And 5 That Sucked » December 20, 2012 1:38 am

Russell wrote:

... that's kinda what I meant with Wild Target, with the "background-yet-still-there", from the stills I did get to see.  ....  But I see it's another case like War Horse, huh?  I got that movie partly just out of delighted curiosity to see my 'favorite new actor' in something else, and he's only in it for a short time!  TTSS, on the other hand, was quite good, I do recommend.... especially with Ben and Oldman balancing each other's roles.....  Nightwatching and The Robinsons, did sound intriguing, even with knowing nothing about, though...  will take your guy's words for it. .... we're all geeks enjoying the same things, right? ...

It's been a few months since I saw Wild Target, but my recollection is that most of the (brief) time Freeman is on the screen, he's right up front.  Dunno what to make of the stills you mentioned.

What did you think of War Horse, aside from the scarcity of Cumberbatch?  I've heard all sorts of opinions, and would be interested in yours.  I saw a brief clip of TTSS on an awards show, and it looked interesting -- but even though I loved Gary Oldman in the Potter films, I didn't recognize him without his "Sirius Black" hair!

If you haven't already, you might want to check out this forum's threads for some of Freeman's films and tv shows: The Hobbit, of course (lots of threads for that!), Bruiser, Pirates!, The Good Night, Nightwatching, Hitchhiker's Guide, Hardware, and Love Actually.  Several of us have posted some pretty detailed opinions (with generally very few real spoilers).  As you'll see in one of my posts regarding Nightwatching, that and The Robinsons are actually two of Freeman's personal favorites.

Right, us geeks gotta stick together!


whistling in the dark wrote:

I haven't seen Long Hot Summer or his episode of Picking Up the Pieces. ... I have intentionally avoided The Reichenbach Fall.

I love his char

Martin Freeman » Martin Freeman: 5 Awesome Performances And 5 That Sucked » December 19, 2012 3:50 pm

That's from the flash-back at the beginning of Nativity, when Freeman's character is a struggling actor.  I can see how you'd be curious!

Freeman is on-screen for maybe ten minutes in Wild Target, but his character is most certainly not in the background -- you can't miss him!

I have yet to see Benedict Cumberbatch in anything besides Sherlock, so you're ahead of me there (not that it's a contest).

Hey, we're next-door neighbors!

Martin Freeman » Favourite Martin pics » December 19, 2012 3:00 am

Thank you, whistling in the dark, for posting the links to your sources -- it's good information to have, and besides, when my browser doesn't load all the photos, I can easily load the missed items.

Martin Freeman » Martin Freeman: 5 Awesome Performances And 5 That Sucked » December 19, 2012 2:32 am

Oh.   Well, you're definitely way ahead of me -- IMDb lists 56 titles that have been released, leaving 40 that I haven't seen!

What are the other two that you haven't seen?

Are you intentionally avoiding "The Reichenbach Fall," or has it simply managed to elude you so far?

Martin Freeman » Martin Freeman: 5 Awesome Performances And 5 That Sucked » December 18, 2012 7:54 pm

Having seen only seven of your thirteen, I can't really compare our lists, but it was a real struggle to fill my bottom five.  In fact, I'd be perfectly willing to re-watch any of them (though in the case of The All Together, I'd insist on having control of the fast-forward).  And if I'd made my lists a week ago -- or a week from now -- they'd likely be somewhat different. 

I'm amazed to see that Sherlock isn't even in your top eight (especially considering that you've joined this forum), but I will admit that I cannot be objective in this matter.  I had never heard of Martin Freeman before watching (entirely by accident) "A Study in Pink," and it was "The Reichenbach Fall" that prompted me to see what else he's been in -- so I'm very grateful to John Watson!

Martin Freeman » Martin Freeman: 5 Awesome Performances And 5 That Sucked » December 18, 2012 3:11 am

I would first like to point out that What Culture seems to have intended his "worst" list to be more like, "Five things that Martin Freeman was sorta wasted in" (rather than things he was actually bad in).  I've seen four of the five, and agree that he appears to have done as well as could be done, considering.  (One quibble: Freeman's character in Love Actually is a stand-in, not a body double.)  My current Freeman collection consists of fifteen things in which he has a significant role, and which are available on DVD.  (Therefore I have not seen Ali G, Men Only, or Micro Men.)

Here's my (current) list of his most memorable roles (in no particular order):
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey
OK, so I don't have this one on DVD (yet), but I've seen it, and it definitely belongs here.  Freeman *is* Bilbo.
Sherlock
Need I say more?
The Office
Tim may well be the best character ever to grace a sit-com.
Bruiser
Virtually all of the best bits feature Freeman.  My own favorites include the Gary & Samantha sketches (wherein the husband is on a different kick every week), the elderly American actor (interviewed by an obnoxious British reporter), and the hyper-active documentary host at an archeological dig.
The Good Night
This is billed as a comedy, but it's at least as much a drama with a thought-provoking philosophical theme.  Freeman gives a really touching performance.

My (current) list of things he might have been well-advised to skip (again, in random order):
Confetti
This does have at least one memorable scene, where Freeman's character lovingly coaches his tone-deaf bride through her musical vows, visibly willing her to hit the right notes.  Another quibble with What Culture:  Apparently the actual reason that Webb & Colman threatened to sue was that certain features of their anatomy had not been pixilated (they played naturists).
[b][i]The All Toget

Martin Freeman » The Hobbit- update release dates etc. » December 12, 2012 4:07 am

We're driving down to the theater very late on Thursday (right after watching Elementary, actually) for the very first showing, Friday at 12:01 a.m.  When we bought the tickets, they asked whether we wanted 3-D or regular, and we decided to go with regular for our first time, so we wouldn't risk being distracted by the technology.  Later on, yeah, we'll see it in 3-D for sure!

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum