BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



January 9, 2017 7:38 pm  #7321


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

besleybean wrote:

Sometimes it's like 2 parallel universes operate on this forum!

 
Indeed!
If you take a peek into the johnlock thread, you'll find us all very happy about the recent developments. I hope the last ep will make both universes happy again. It seems like a feat but apparently it's very possible, judging by the different interpretations of TLD.

I'm afraid the queerbaiting accusations won't stop unless the two are shown in bed together or something. The delicate storytelling is considered queerbaiting in and of itself by some. Can't be helped, I guess.


-----
"The posh boy loves the dominatrix." Context matters.
 

January 9, 2017 7:41 pm  #7322


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

To be honest I do read the other thread all the time and that is exactly what I was referring to.
But I couldn't avoid seeing posts anyway, as they appear in the list of new posts.
As long as we all always call people out on queer baiting accusations.
Personally I will not stand for Mark and Steven being so slighted.

Last edited by besleybean (January 9, 2017 7:41 pm)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

January 9, 2017 8:02 pm  #7323


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I've gone and had a look now, and I've got to clarify - when I said Mrs Hudson doesn't ship them any more, I meant that she doesn't think they are "together".   Not that she doesn't care about them - I think she goes to extremes to help because she cares for them and thinks they need each other, not because she thinks they are "in a relationship". 

And honestly, it's not heteronormativity that makes me see Irene as Sherlock's romantic interest.  It's what we're told over and over in the show.  Including in this episode.

Now I'm happy if people are happy.  What I can see is that this very much a Sherlock/John relationship episode, and there relationship does develop (despite the claims that the only thing that could happen was romance!) and for people who want them to end up as a couple, there is lots to like.  They are now reconciled, both single, closer than ever, etc.  But I think in terms of Johnlock being endgame, planned and written into the show through coding, etc. - not so much at all.  It's kind of dismissed in this episode, if it wasn't before. 

 

January 9, 2017 8:08 pm  #7324


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I'm so happy and content, Liberty. Can we just agree to disagree?

(Also, I love Irene. ASiB used to be my favorite ep - TLD will probably take over now - and still, I see Sherlock and Irene more in a battle of wits/wills than in any kind of an intimate relationship.)


-----
"The posh boy loves the dominatrix." Context matters.
 

January 9, 2017 8:12 pm  #7325


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I never wanted them to do SIB, but knew they would.
It is an excellent episode.
But I am not keen on the canon story, so it was always gonna be my least favourite episode.
I don't like any suggestion of attraction between Sherlock and Irene.  But the team have always made it clear that they feel an attraction there and have now shown it twice.
Oh and what are these great texts between Sherlock and John that I saw reference to.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

January 9, 2017 8:17 pm  #7326


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I agree with you there ewige, although for me this has nothing to do with Johnlock, I fail to see a prolonged love story between Irene and Sherlock. I think during ASIB they were fascinated with each other and that was what attracted them to each other. For Sherlock, it was the mystery of someone he could not easily read. For Irene, it was the mystery of someone not being overly interested in her physical charms. But that was then. We don't know about Irene of course, but Sherlock has evolved so much since then. Also I am a bit afraid of ASIB being ruined if they should bring Irene back. But as I said, all of this is not necessarily connected to Johnlock. 


****************************************************************************************************************************************
We balance probabilities and choose the most likely. It is the scientific use of the imagination.    
 

January 9, 2017 8:20 pm  #7327


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

We can't agree to disagree on a debate thread!    But as ever, I'm not arguing against people shipping them at all, or interpreting the episodes the way they want.  It's always been about whether Moftiss are intentionally writing Johnlock.  I don't think they are, and I actually think they are being very clear about it now.  Much less ambiguity than in previous episodes.

ASIB has been my favourite episode too, for a number of reasons!  It may be deposed now too, but I feel I need some space from S4 before I make my mind up.  I do think they used that episode, and that character (Irene) to illustrate something about Sherlock and romantic relationships.  He's kind of afraid of them. 

I do think it's signifcant that years down the line, that's what she still symbolises. Even John can see it.   And Sherlock sees being tempted to text in the same light as John being tempted to stray from his marriage.   It's definitely sexual/romantic.  And that's juxtaposed with that beautiful, but clearly platonic, non-sexual hug with John. 

Last edited by Liberty (January 9, 2017 8:21 pm)

 

January 9, 2017 8:20 pm  #7328


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I don't really think we will see Irene back.
Would the team go for a romantic ending?
I don't think so.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

January 9, 2017 8:22 pm  #7329


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I don't think so either.  But since TAB I've had a feeling that this would be explored more in S4.  Maybe that's all we're getting, but I think next week we'll go back to Sherlock's childhood and see exactly why he's scared of romantic entanglements. 

 

January 9, 2017 8:24 pm  #7330


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Of course.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

January 9, 2017 8:34 pm  #7331


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I think I'm not much for debating now because I honestly think Moftiss are so clever that both readings are perfectly valid since they intend them to be so.


-----
"The posh boy loves the dominatrix." Context matters.
 

January 9, 2017 8:35 pm  #7332


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I believe what they said was: we don't mind people seeing it that way(Johnlock), but we didn't write it that way.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

January 9, 2017 8:47 pm  #7333


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I suppose what I see is that there are different interpretations that are valid, but there seems to be only one intention.   I don't honestly think they've carefully crafted two parallel stories here.   They have been quite clear on which story is the intended one, both in what we see on screen, and in what they say in interviews, etc. 

I think that as it's gone on, as well, the two strands have move farther apart.  For instance, I think it's so clear that John loved Mary deeply now.  To imagine that he wanted her out of the way so he could be with Sherlock changes that story drastically.

Anyway. We'll find out their final intentions in a few days!

 

January 9, 2017 8:52 pm  #7334


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

But of course he loved Mary. It doesn't mean he couldn't love Sherlock at the same time.

See, I really don't think the last ep will settle the debate... because Moftiss intend it to be this way, allow for different readings. Some of the best classics have an open ending, do why not here.


-----
"The posh boy loves the dominatrix." Context matters.
 

January 9, 2017 8:58 pm  #7335


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Because as we are trying to say: no ambiguity has ever been shown in the show.  Sherlock and John only ever shown interested in women and in interviews all the team have been quite clear that Johnlock was not their intention.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

January 9, 2017 9:21 pm  #7336


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Liberty wrote:

I suppose what I see is that there are different interpretations that are valid, but there seems to be only one intention.

Thank you - THAT is the word I've been looking for when debating here the last god-knows-how-many months! The difference between interpretations and intentions. 
 


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"We'll live on starlight and crime scenes" - wordstrings


Team Hudders!
 
 

January 9, 2017 9:22 pm  #7337


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I think we've all been saying it for a while.
But yes, this is succinctly put.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

January 9, 2017 9:51 pm  #7338


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

besleybean wrote:

Because as we are trying to say: no ambiguity has ever been shown in the show.  Sherlock and John only ever shown interested in women and in interviews all the team have been quite clear that Johnlock was not their intention.

And if "you" say it, it must be true of course. :-p

I think staring there is no ambiguity belittles the talent of our writers. But just like ewige, I don't feel like debating. I am extremely happy with what I saw. :-)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I still believe that love conquers all!

     

"Quick, man, if you love me."
 

January 9, 2017 9:53 pm  #7339


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Mot people are happy if they feel they are getting what they want.
With BBC Sherlock, I still love it even when it doesn't give me exactly what I want.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

January 9, 2017 10:10 pm  #7340


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Same here. I have things I prefer and things I like better than others. But in general, I'm happy to go where Moftiss takes me. 

But I also am extremly happy with what we got. 

Last edited by Vhanja (January 9, 2017 10:11 pm)


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"We'll live on starlight and crime scenes" - wordstrings


Team Hudders!
 
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum