Offline
Liberty wrote:
So why do you feel that the "groundbreaking" quote is about Mary specifically? Or am I misunderstanding?
That's what I'm asking myself now, too, because I never made the connection between "groundbreaking" and Mary and the baby. I always thought this was meant as a general statement and it can mean anything, basically. Maybe even something we don't know anything about yet.
Last edited by SolarSystem (August 27, 2016 10:16 am)
Offline
As for me, I never thought groundbreaking could be associated with Mary. I have two or three ideas what it might be but she is not among them.
Offline
SusiGo wrote:
As for me, I never thought groundbreaking could be associated with Mary. I have two or three ideas what it might be but she is not among them.
I think I know about idea No 1 but what are two and three?
Offline
EMP and/or something about the childhood/youth/family history of the Holmes brothers.
Offline
All of those would be good.
Offline
Definitely.
Offline
Let's just hope that they don't consider a major character death as 'groundbreaking'...
Offline
Didn't they try to fool us with this 'death of a major character' thing last time?
When CAM had his brain blown out.
Offline
I do not see why they should.
Offline
Amanda suggested that something similar had been done before. The previous most "groundbreaking", "television history" thing that they've done was the fall at the end of TRF. I remember it well, even though I wasn't watching Sherlock at the time, because it made national news. So maybe that's a starting point for looking at the kind of thing they might be doing in S4.
Offline
Death of mother and child might fit that category...though so would death of a lead character!(Aargh)
Offline
Why was the fall 'groundbreaking'...? Serious question, because I never considered it to be groundbreaking.
As for the major character death, I'm not saying that I'm having any hard evidence for this, it's just that in my mind I keep coming back to the fact that we have two Watsons now. And one of them seems to be presented to us as being far more clever than the other one. And I can't help myself, but exchanging one for the other would be extremely groundbreaking. John dies, Mary stays with Sherlock.
Offline
Please correct me, but I would consider "groundbreaking" and "making history" as having a basically positive connotation? And while playing brilliant mind games could be considered as such, the death of a woman and her child IMO cannot be described in these terms. Do you honestly believe they would say, "ha, we did something really groundbreaking here, killed Mary and the baby off?"
@Solar: As I have said before, I do not see any evidence for that, neither in setlock or in the show itself. And I would not call it groundbreaking, but TV ratings suicide but this is just me.
Last edited by SusiGo (August 27, 2016 11:07 am)
Offline
I know, not a pleasant thought!
Offline
SusiGo wrote:
@Solar: As I have said before, I do not see any evidence for that, neither in setlock or in the show itself. And I would not call it groundbreaking, but TV ratings suicide but this is just me.
Like I said, I don't have any hard evidence for this, either. And I agree that this could be ratings suicide. I'm just not convinced that Mofftiss would not do a story they believe in because of possibly bad ratings. (Of course I don't know how much say the BBC would have in something like this.)
(And talking about ratings, that might also be a problem with the EMP. I'm not convinced the general audience would get it/like it/accept it.)
Offline
SolarSystem wrote:
Why was the fall 'groundbreaking'...? Serious question, because I never considered it to be groundbreaking.
I think "groundbreaking" is a word that's bandied about a lot even when it's not clear what ground is actually being broken, but anyway, here's an article describing it as
Mind you, I suppose you could say the same about the Great British Bake-Off final. So maybe it's the combination of the media attention along with the unsolved puzzle left for two years. I hope we're not going to have to wait years to resolve something in S4.
Offline
Personally I would take that, if I knew we were definitely getting S 5!
Offline
Solar: I agree with what you say about EMP.
But what we would be groundbreaking about replacing John by a woman (has been done at least once, in "Elementary)? Why would this make TV history, apart from a momentary shock, probably followed by disappointment?
Last edited by SusiGo (August 27, 2016 11:29 am)
Offline
I'm glad you reminded me of that!
Offline
As for the fall being groundbreaking - in a way it was, Solar. Because it was the first time, I think, that Sherlock Holmes committed suicide. Which is quite a big thing.