Offline
Vhanja wrote:
Concering the defense of John (a bit over the top language in the last reply of this post, but I do agree with the gist of it):
People wish to reduce the show called "Sherlock" to pure John-tale in S4:
but I guess that´s still "not caring for John´s experience and depth" etc.
Of course, once you call a fictional character names, you are also insulting the RL actor who plays him/her... duh.
And here I though that the only people who call John "trash" are his admirers who delight in this part of his personality. I never saw a meta where "John-trash" cliche was not mentioned with some kind of strange fondness and delight....
But what do I know, me, a part of this deathly Cumbercult....
Offline
Well, as I said, the language of that last one is a bit over the top. But I agree with the main point - sometimes some fans will put Sherlock as the poor victim of the horrible, violent and selfish John. A view I highly disagree with.
I have, luckily, never seen anyone on this forum title John as "trash" or "trashcan", but I see it frequently on Tumblr. It doesn't sit right with me at all, even though I know it's supposedly a term of endearment.
Offline
Vhanja wrote:
I have, luckily, never seen anyone on this forum title John as "trash" or "trashcan", but I see it frequently on Tumblr. It doesn't sit right with me at all, even though I know it's supposedly a term of endearment.
I really saw "Trash-John" coming only from people who actually like John. They even had this strange motto of "John Watson is trash, that´s why I like him...." for a while.
People who hate John usually simply state that they hate him.
Offline
nakahara wrote:
I really saw "Trash-John" coming only from people who actually like John. They even had this strange motto of "John Watson is trash, that´s why I like him...." for a while.
People who hate John usually simply state that they hate him.
Yes, that is true.
Well, I'm a big fan of Martin Freeman's John Watson. I think he is a highly nuanced and interesting character. I don't think Sherlock is the victim of John, and neither do I see him as a "trashcan". That doesn't mean that I find the show John-centric or that I am more critical towards Sherlock than I am towards John. I adore Benedict's Sherlock, it's one of the more interesting tv characters I've seen in years.
But I do not agree with the idea that poor, little Sherlock is being treated like a baby by the horrible John. Not for a second.
Offline
Vhanja wrote:
But I do not agree with the idea that poor, little Sherlock is being treated like a baby by the horrible John. Not for a second.
Well, that´s true, but it goes both ways - many people are also convinced that poor long-suffering John is a victim of this asshole psychopath Sherlock... can´t help it, I guess.
Offline
nakahara wrote:
Well, that´s true, but it goes both ways - many people are also convinced that poor long-suffering John is a victim of this asshole psychopath Sherlock... can´t help it, I guess.
Well, to me this has evened itself out. I do think that in S1 John was a bit bullied around by Sherlock. And I do think that in S3 John was sometimes a bit unneccessary angry towards Sherlock. S2 was a better equilibrium for them both. I hope they can get back to it.
Offline
Some interesting definition of "John-trash":
Offline
nakahara wrote:
Some interesting definition of "John-trash":
Well, I guess the fandom like their dramatics just as much as the Holmes brothers.
Offline
Just a note. I have frequently referred to myself as "johnlock trash." As in I am all johnlock all the time. I see it everywhere and I wallow in it happily. It's just a bit of fun. Kind of like the saying "You call me bitch like it's a bad thing"? You turn something negative into a positive.
Offline
I know what you mean. And if it had only been mentioned once with a bit of fun and been done with it, it would've been just fine. But as it is now, I feel they are narrowing Martin Freeman's performance into one word, and that just feels wrong. Because it's much more nuanced than that.
Offline
Vhanja wrote:
nakahara wrote:
Well, that´s true, but it goes both ways - many people are also convinced that poor long-suffering John is a victim of this asshole psychopath Sherlock... can´t help it, I guess.
Well, to me this has evened itself out. I do think that in S1 John was a bit bullied around by Sherlock. And I do think that in S3 John was sometimes a bit unneccessary angry towards Sherlock. S2 was a better equilibrium for them both. I hope they can get back to it.
Yeah, me, too!
Offline
This may depend on what happens to Mary and if anyone gets blamed for it...
Offline
@besleybean: Sorry to bring this up again but I got really curious. In which scenes after Mary shot John do you think that John looks happy about being together with Mary?
Offline
Well I can't honestly say he looks blissfully happy.
But he could have just waked away from her and didn't.
He's made his choice freely, so I can only assume he wants to.
He chose Mary over anybody else.
Offline
besleybean wrote:
Well I can't honestly say he looks blissfully happy.
But he could have just waked away from her and didn't.
He's made his choice freely, so I can only assume he wants to.
He chose Mary over anybody else.
Agreed. But staying with someone is not the same as being happy with someone.
I really wonder how John's character will develope during S4.
Offline
I'm not sure how it could develop...
I think he's very well written anyway.
Offline
nakahara wrote:
Vhanja wrote:
But I do not agree with the idea that poor, little Sherlock is being treated like a baby by the horrible John. Not for a second.
Well, that´s true, but it goes both ways - many people are also convinced that poor long-suffering John is a victim of this asshole psychopath Sherlock... can´t help it, I guess.
That's what I heard for two years-- but I think that was more Fanon wish- fulfillment John.
Offline
The reason satirical trash John rings true and upsets some people , is probably because Martin Freeman is such a good actor , the writers can give John /Martin whatever ill thought out or outrageous scenes they fancy , and Martin pulls it off.
John is a man of paradox. He talks the talk of order and morality and manners , but he walks quite comfortably amidst chaos and has violent angry outbursts and occasional hypocrytical rudeness.
That's why I love John. Doctor and Soldier.One extreme to the other.
I reckon they could do any of the extreme plotlines fans fantasise, and MF would make us believe.
I do understand people thinking MF acting is overlooked though , with B.C. as Sherlock and A.S as Moriarty we have talented scene stealing leads. It's a good thing.
Offline
This is quite a sad post by yours truly. Wanted to share it, though:
Offline
You made me so sad Susi! Why? Why'd you do it?!