BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



June 24, 2015 6:07 pm  #1261


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Thank you. Although the second half was perfectly fine. 


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 

June 24, 2015 6:09 pm  #1262


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Works for me, too - if done properly, it is almost a nod to canon days, when women died from infections.
Yes, this could go.


Eventually everyone will support Johnlock.   Independent OSAJ Affiliate

... but there may be some new players now. It’s okay. The East Wind takes us all in the end.
 

June 24, 2015 6:44 pm  #1263


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I've been thinking about this-- and I'm coming (reluctantly) to the conclusion that though we may think that killing the baby is too dark, too over the top for television, the producers of the show may not see that. 
Because of shows like Law and Order SVU, and others-- this is not something we've never seen before. And Mofftiss have proved that they like pushing the envelope when it comes to "darkness' in the show: Sherlock killing Magnussen in cold blood is but one example. Why wouldn't they kill off the baby-- and Mary, too? They aren't women, they don't have our sensitivities, or sensibilities.  And it's a golden opportunity to up the ante when it comes to angst in the show. 

Quite frankly, I hope they don't take that route: do we really need another season on grieving, angry, broken John? (And, I'm sure he'll blame Sherlock, or they'll write it so it's All Sherlock's Fault.) Which means that Sherlock and John would be farther away from each other than ever. 

Sigh. 

I really wish they hadn't brought a baby into this.  

 

June 24, 2015 6:58 pm  #1264


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

RavenMorganLeigh wrote:

I've been thinking about this-- and I'm coming (reluctantly) to the conclusion that though we may think that killing the baby is too dark, too over the top for television, the producers of the show may not see that. ......

 

I think you are right  - they held a blind old lady hostage and blew her up in the end. And haven't they said that the show is to get "darker"? So I think if they want to get rid of the baby, the "best" we can hope for is a car crash (or similar accident), crib death, it being stillborn... Or next season's big villain could kidnap it and then all sorts of things could happen and go wrong that I don't feel like getting into right now.
 

 

June 24, 2015 8:06 pm  #1265


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Do you remember how we discussed if the Mary did call the ambulance in HLV and there was the argument that she could not because was wearing gloves? I just stumbled upon this: 

http://pvtrocles.tumblr.com/post/122357926069
 


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 

June 24, 2015 8:09 pm  #1266


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Interesting find, Susi.


------------------------------------------------------------

Eventually everyone will support Johnlock.


"If you're not reading the subtext then hell mend you"  -  Steven Moffat
"Love conquers all" Benedict Cumberbatch on Sherlock's and John's relationship
"This is a show about a detective, his best friend, his wife, their baby and their dog" - Nobody. Ever.

 

June 24, 2015 8:19 pm  #1267


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Yep-- good one, SusiGo. :-)

 

June 24, 2015 8:20 pm  #1268


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I'm sure someone can explain this - with a lot of thought and brainwrecking 


Eventually everyone will support Johnlock.   Independent OSAJ Affiliate

... but there may be some new players now. It’s okay. The East Wind takes us all in the end.
 

June 24, 2015 8:20 pm  #1269


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

tonnaree wrote:

NatureNoHumansNo wrote:

Sherlock : " Moriarty is back, the game is on"
John " I don't care, Mary just died from a fierce devastating flu and used her last breath to confess the baby is not mine"
Sherlock : " Ok, then, let's go to bed, I'm gonna comfort you and we'll chase Moriarty tomorow"

You're right, this is gooooooood TV!

 
Works for me.  Although I'd rather have a dramatic moment with Mary as the villian and John has to shoot her because she's threating to shoot Sherlock again. 

Me, too!

 

June 24, 2015 8:22 pm  #1270


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Maybe we could post it in the plot bunny thread? 


Eventually everyone will support Johnlock.   Independent OSAJ Affiliate

... but there may be some new players now. It’s okay. The East Wind takes us all in the end.
 

June 24, 2015 8:40 pm  #1271


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Harriet wrote:

Maybe we could post it in the plot bunny thread?

There's PLOT BUNNY THREAD!?!? 

Squeeeeeee!

 

June 24, 2015 8:41 pm  #1272


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion


Eventually everyone will support Johnlock.   Independent OSAJ Affiliate

... but there may be some new players now. It’s okay. The East Wind takes us all in the end.
 

June 25, 2015 2:27 am  #1273


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Thank you, Harriet!
 

 

June 26, 2015 10:19 am  #1274


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

SusiGo wrote:

...  And I really wonder why Mary needed a shoulder to cry on three times during her time with John. 

Actually, nobody says that Mary needed a shoulder to cry on - Sherlock says that David offered to be a shoulder to cry on on three separate occasions (which may or may not be true - David is too intimidated to repond. Or he has nothing to say...) Sounds to me like an ex who doesn't want to believe it's over.

Which wouldn't be my first choice of wedding guest, but I guess they had to fill the reception hall somehow...

 

June 26, 2015 10:40 am  #1275


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

SusiGo wrote:

Do you remember how we discussed if the Mary did call the ambulance in HLV and there was the argument that she could not because was wearing gloves? I just stumbled upon this: 

http://pvtrocles.tumblr.com/post/122357926069
 

Sorry, I don't get it - what does this prove or disprove? Did anybody doubt that Mary is capable of taking her gloves off when needed?

A bit of experimentation has shown that it depends on the type of glove whether one can use a smartphone wearing them: I don't manage with leather, but with fabric and knit it sort of works (well enough for an emergency call, for which it isn't even necessary to unlock the phone, at least not mine) and with latex ones (standard burglar/medical personnel equipment) it's absolutely no problem.

I think it's more interesing to wonder which phone Mary would have used: One wouldn't want to wear a tracking device while engaged in a criminal activity, so no intelligent criminal would come with their personal phone and most certainly wouldn't use it while on the crime scene. So either Mary would have another phone (does anybody know whether the GPS tracking is related to the sim card or the phone hardware? In the first case a second sim card might be enough), or she'd use one of Magnussen's. Or even Sherlock's.

But in all cases she'd put herself proveably on the crime scene (I'm assuming all emergency calls are recorded - anybody knows whether that is true?). Of course, when one leaves two witnesses alive a voiceprint is probably a minor problem...

 

June 26, 2015 12:10 pm  #1276


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

It would've been easy for her to use CAM's phone after she knocked him out.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proud President and Founder of the OSAJ.  
Honorary German  
"Anyone who takes himself too seriously always runs the risk of looking ridiculous; anyone who can consistently laugh at himself does not".
 -Vaclav Havel 
"Life is full of wonder, Love is never wrong."   Melissa Ethridge

I ship it harder than Mrs. Hudson.
    
 
 

June 27, 2015 9:58 am  #1277


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Why did CAM keep silent? With all he had on Mary then,old stuff and her threating him in the office, he could have effectively gotten her out of the way. Wasn't he ever afraid Mary would come back and kill him on second try? What does CAM do while Watsons have their "domestic"? Just waiting for the game to play itself out? With Marys gun to his head, he actually does look afraid. He must have known she thinks "people like him should be killed". So he gets away, and if she was about to kill him, he is damn lucky to be alive. And he does nothing? When Sherlock corneres CAM in Appledore, nothing about Mary has leaked apparently,because otherwise Sherlock couldn't say "she's safe now".

I think Mary uses CAMs phone,it's in the direction she's reaching, but I would have to rewatch to be sure.
 

Last edited by Whisky (June 27, 2015 10:04 am)


_____________________________________________________________

"It is what it is."

 

June 27, 2015 11:58 am  #1278


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I don't think Mary really wanted to kill CAM - at least not until she had gotten the "damning documents" from him. At that point in time everybody still believed CAD had these vast archives of evidence which could have been accessed by somebody else (his successor, friend, lawyer) in the case of his death. "Kill me and the information goes public" should be pretty effective life insurance (which is why I can't understand CAM giving the game away in Appledore - for me he was a dead man walking from the moment he said the information was only in his head. Actually, I was rather disappointed that John didn't kill him right there and then, in the little white room).

Leaves the question why Mary broke into CAM's office at all when the archives are supposed to be in Appledore (and to me Appledore looks a lot easier to break into than a city skyscraper) - was there any reason to believe that CAM would keep whatever he had on her in his city office safe?

As for why CAM kept silent - I don't think he wanted to get Mary out of the way. He wanted to put pressure on Mycroft, by putting pressure on Sherlock via pressure on John via pressure on Mary. If he denounces Mary to the police, her previous employers or anybody else who has a grudge against her the chain of "pressure points" loses its starting point. Meaning that most probably CAM cleaned up any evidence Mary might have left in the office... (It just occurs to me that it might have been a good idea for Mary to force CAM to make the emergency call before knocking him out - that solves both gloves and voiceprint problems).

 

June 27, 2015 2:44 pm  #1279


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Whisky wrote:

Why did CAM keep silent? With all he had on Mary then,old stuff and her threating him in the office, he could have effectively gotten her out of the way. Wasn't he ever afraid Mary would come back and kill him on second try? What does CAM do while Watsons have their "domestic"? Just waiting for the game to play itself out? With Marys gun to his head, he actually does look afraid. He must have known she thinks "people like him should be killed". So he gets away, and if she was about to kill him, he is damn lucky to be alive. And he does nothing? When Sherlock corneres CAM in Appledore, nothing about Mary has leaked apparently,because otherwise Sherlock couldn't say "she's safe now".

I think Mary uses CAMs phone,it's in the direction she's reaching, but I would have to rewatch to be sure.
 

Something to remember when rewatching is that in this scene we are not watching what "actually" happened.  We are watching what Sherlock thinks happened.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proud President and Founder of the OSAJ.  
Honorary German  
"Anyone who takes himself too seriously always runs the risk of looking ridiculous; anyone who can consistently laugh at himself does not".
 -Vaclav Havel 
"Life is full of wonder, Love is never wrong."   Melissa Ethridge

I ship it harder than Mrs. Hudson.
    
 
 

June 27, 2015 4:33 pm  #1280


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

But it makes no sense to show things in a totally wrong way because we as viewers would never come to a right conclusion. Sherlock says Mary called, and I would believe him. The alternative would be that CAM called instead of Mary, and I don't think that makes sense if I see the power balance in the office - Mary has the gun and is in charge, why would she let CAM make the phonecall. John is so quickly after in the office, Mary can't have more than few moments and if she was to make sure someone calls an ambulance she would have to do it herself. Also CAM looks pretty confused and knocked out, not sure he would grasp the situation quick enough. All he says is "he got shot", and while he says it he looks like he is still processing the information. So I would put my bets on Mary as the one phoning.

I think CAM shows the room to John and Sherlock because he thinks he has already won. It doesn't occure to him that Sherlock would murder him. He believes in a higher power - himself. Very similar to Sherlock in that regard, if we are to believe Irene's opinion on Sherlock.
 

Last edited by Whisky (June 27, 2015 4:38 pm)


_____________________________________________________________

"It is what it is."

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum