Offline
I've been meaning to post something about what was said in the commentary about Mary, but it's all in little bits and pieces. The general picture I'm getting from the commentary is that they're not hinting at anything other than a straightforward reading of what we see on screen. (However, that could be because they want to surprise us in S4!). Here's a couple of selected bits:
(Apologies for transcription errors again. And I know there are few times when I haven't been able to make things out clearly and have just left them out. They're joking in the spoilers, in case it isn't obvious!).
After Mary shoots the coin...
Steven: I slightly wish ... I cut a couple of lines out that I wish I'd kept in, which is ... when she says, you know ... he says you saved my life or whatever ... I nearly killed you .. and he says you didn't hit the middle of the coin, I mean nobody's perfect. Which slightly covers the fact that although she saves his life, she also nearly kills him. So in Sherlock's defence, he's really quite forgiving ...
Now this is interesting. When I first heard it, I thought Steven was saying that he wished he'd made it clearer that Mary only nearly killed him because her aim wasn't precisely accurate i.e. the surgery explanation was the correct one. But it could also just mean that Steven wishes he'd made the surgery explanation more plausible (whether it's true or not). What do you think? Then saying that Sherlock is forgiving implies that he accepts the surgery idea, but forgives Mary for nearly killing him .... oh, I don't know. I was really hoping the surgery thing would be properly explained.
They confirm that AGRA stands for
The confrontation at 221BAmanda Google Rampant Abbington.
five Doctor Who scripts!
Last edited by Liberty (November 5, 2014 8:49 pm)
Offline
They are such freaking Trolls!
Offline
What parts? Or all of it? I do think these are a lot more ambiguous than the bit about reshooting the Janine scene (which was very clear). I mean, obviously the memory stick revelations are jokes (there was a lot of laughter at those points). But the discussion about Mary's motivations sounded genuine - that she craves adventure, that she has been a reluctant villain, etc. I'm still kind of hoping for Mary to be S4s archenemy, but it would still be interesting to think that she wanted to "go straight" and that something will get in the way to stop her.
Also bear in mind that a couple of times, Mark is commenting on bits that he didn't write, so he could be as in the dark as the rest of us . OK, well, not THAT much in the dark.
Last edited by Liberty (November 4, 2014 4:28 pm)
Offline
I would take everything they say about Mary with a grain of salt. Many people agree that she is more of a cliffhanger than Moriarty and at this point they would never reveal something that could be used as a surprise in the next series. If I recall correctly in the previous episodes they have not given away or explained really important things either. Explaining Mary here would be almost like explaining how Sherlock faked his death in the TRF commentary.
Offline
Thank you for making the transcripts, Liberty!
Liberty wrote:
Steven: I slightly wish ... I cut a couple of lines out that I wish I'd kept in, which is ... when she says, you know ... he says you saved my life or whatever ... I nearly killed you .. and he says you didn't hit the middle of the coin, I mean nobody's perfect. Which slightly covers the fact that although she saves his life, she also nearly kills him. So in Sherlock's defence, he's really quite forgiving ...
Now this is interesting. When I first heard it, I thought Steven was saying that he wished he'd made it clearer that Mary only nearly killed him because her aim wasn't precisely accurate i.e. the surgery explanation was the correct one. But it could also just mean that Steven wishes he'd made the surgery explanation more plausible (whether it's true or not). What do you think?
I think it is as I feared, the surgery explanation is meant to be taken at face value. If that´s the case I think they really should have kept that line in. It still wouldn´t make much sense, but at least there would have been a tiny glimpse of remorse from her side that would make it more believable. Now all we have from her is silence, threats and the blank page of the AGRA-stick (I laughed so hard at the explanation of the acronym..)
Offline
No, I didn't expect a full explanation (e.g. is Mary going to be the main villain, or will she be redeemed? Too much of a spoiler!). But I thought the comment about the coin seemed to suggest that the surgery explanation WON'T be explored further in S4. It doesn't really say either way, though. Yes, leaving the coin in would have been useful if they were going to leave us with the surgery explanation (still hoping they don't). It still feels like a flaw in the story, but at least there would be some sort of set-up for it, some reason that it could true in that universe. But then it could be that it would just show how Sherlock managed to convince himself, or even just how he managed to convince John ... I don't want to give up hope!
It would be nice to have a more rounded villain than Magnussen or Moriarty too - somebody a bit more sympathetic, but who has to be stopped. I'd be happy to for them to go that way with her.
Here's another little bit about putting in lots of clues that Mary wasn't who she said she was - the audience were fooled, and so was Sherlock:
Steven: He's charmed by Mary. He stops listening to his own brain.
I thought that was interesting, because I'd thought Sherlock had warmed to Mary because of his regard for John, but it seems that he very genuinely likes her, to the extent that it affects his judgment. I suppose that makes sense - even when he interrupts an assasination and she points a gun at him, he doesn't believe she will shoot him.
I meant to mention that the bit about Mary's character above suggests that she wasn't "going straight" until she met John - so even with her new identity she might have had a few years where she was "working". After all, 7 months without an adventure is too long (Sherlock appearing just when he did probably saved the relationship!).
Last edited by Liberty (November 4, 2014 5:09 pm)
Offline
I was mainly laughing at the AGRA and memory stick explinations this time.
Offline
I really like this part of the TEH commentary:
Mark: “It’s interesting, isn’t it – in the original stories, Sherlock comes back; of course, Mrs Watson has died in the interim, but there’s an interesting thing right back at the beginning. Doctor Watson gets married at the end of the second story and then all the short stories either take place in a strange middle bit before the marriage, or when she allows him out. And we thought, you can almost sense Conan Doyle thinking, ‘Oh, I’ve got that wrong,’ so we thought, well, the ideal thing is to bring her in now. Mrs Watson becomes a new factor, and when you’re looking to do a big thing for a season, it’s like, ‘Well, this is as big as it gets’.”
Steven: “But here’s a thing, Mark: did you know that it’s never actually specified in the stories that Mary dies?”
Mark: “Well, he says ...”
Steven and Mark (almost simultaneously): “... ‘his sad loss’.”
Mark: “Divorce.”
Steven: “It could be a divorce; could she have just buggered off?”
Mark: “It’s possible!”
Steven: “His sad loss is all the sadder because it’s not referred to. You just want specifics, don’t you?! I don’t think we’d get away with that now. Start of the next series: [As Sherlock] ‘I heard about your sad loss.’ [As John] ‘Yeah, well.’ ‘But what was it?’ ‘Well, it was a loss.’”
(source: arianedevere)
This leaves all sorts of possibilities for the next series.
Last edited by SusiGo (November 5, 2014 8:14 pm)
Offline
There´s another one:
Mark: “We talked a lot, didn’t we, about having that problem of suddenly someone spoiling the fun – it’s the worst thing you can do, so the important thing was to regard the third series as a new team in a way, and actually that fundamentally she and Sherlock would immediately get on. And that sort of changes everything.”
Steven: “Which resulted in us writing a scene between Sherlock and Mary that we couldn’t make work. We both took passes at it and couldn’t make it work and it’s all replaced by one line.”
Mark: “‘I like him’.”
What do you think about it, did the "I like him" make it work as intended?
Offline
Interesting, zatoichi. Well, on the one hand I think it was brave to skip a scene they felt didn't work. That could have felt a bit forced upon the viewer. On the other hand, I must admit that I never thought very much about that single line, but know with this comments and in retrospect it's a bit .....thin???
But no, it didn't really touch my heart.
Offline
I confess I've always loved it and agree with the commentary on it...
Offline
mrshouse wrote:
Interesting, zatoichi. Well, on the one hand I think it was brave to skip a scene they felt didn't work. That could have felt a bit forced upon the viewer. On the other hand, I must admit that I never thought very much about that single line, but know with this comments and in retrospect it's a bit .....thin???
But no, it didn't really touch my heart.
I agree, to me it feels a bit thin, too. I guess it´s really difficult to make a scene work in which they immediately get on, because it´s a very unlikely thing to happen. Sherlock has never shown even remote interest in John´s girlfriends, but the two sentences uttered by Mary during the confrontation are supposed to change that. And Mary meets the guy who severely traumatized her future husband and waltzes in dressed as a waiter making a joke of it all, but is also supposed to immediately like him. Somehow this couldn´t really work without feeling a bit forced imo..
Offline
It's great that this is up - there are so many good bits in the commentaries but I haven't been able to find the right thread for them. I like this one too, which sort of goes here...
Steven: “We did think of this relatively early, the endless tease [of how Sherlock survived the fall]. I remember you saying, ‘Of course, actually in real life you wouldn’t be asking How; you’d be saying Why? Why would you do that?”
Mark: “Actually, I just popped that [line] in in the ADR. I said to Benedict, ‘Will you just say that also a system of Japanese wrestling,’ which is the way that Doyle actually explained it, outrageously!”
Steven: “The Doyle explanation doesn’t work at all. His whole reason in the original story for concealing the fact he’s alive is so that Moriarty’s gang don’t find out – but Moran has just seen him, number two in Moriarty’s gang, so it’s all complete nonsense!”
Sue: “That bit from Amanda just then, when she said, ‘Well, he’d have needed a confidant,’ that’s the first little slip-in that she wasn’t exactly what she seemed.”
Steven: “The idea was that you would like Mary because she was getting into the swing of the action so quickly and therefore [you] never questioned the fact that nobody really would – unless, of course, they weren’t what they really seemed to be; and she’s far too at ease with Sherlock Holmes and the way he behaves for a normal person.”
Mark: “And when we get to the deductions on screen we slipped in ‘Liar’ and of course people picked up on it but it was great because they were just going, ‘What does this mean?’”
Sue: “Also, when we were putting it in there, d’you remember, however much you tried to hide ‘Liar’, it just stares you in the face!”
Mark: “Amongst the other [deductions] it once said, ‘Unresolved Jason Orange crush’, which was an attempt to hide ‘Liar’!”
I see what they mean about the signs being there ... her reaction to Sherlock's reappearance doesn't quite make sense. She's not at all bothered about having her engagement interrupted, she's very calm about John's reaction, she's almost collaborating (wrong word) with Sherlock at points, and I think it's nice that she stays and looks after Sherlock a little while John leaves, but it's slightly odd, and then finally, "I like him" rather than "Are you OK?" or something along those lines. The "confidant" line was first obvious major clue, but the whole extended scene, in retrospect, plays out as if Mary is pleased and excited that Sherlock is coming in and shaking things up.
I can just about buy Sherlock accepting Mary in that way, because of the rather vulnerable position he's in. At first he virtually ignores her (apart from wittily answering her questions - "oh my God!" "Not quite" amuses me every time), but she presents herself as an ally (the confidant, the moustache, etc.) and doesn't react the way you would expect the average person to react. And she wants them to reconcile, and says she'll help. Sherlock is very alone at that point, and trying to win John back - I can see why he would be drawn to an ally at that point.
Love the bits about Doyle's explanation ... and the unresolved Jason Orange crush!
Last edited by Liberty (November 5, 2014 9:36 pm)
Offline
Yep, that last bit made me laugh!
Offline
Very funny commentary, thank you for sharing.
Considering Doyle, he didn´t care sh*t about inconsistencies in his stories. I suspect him that he messed with his audience as gladly as Moftiss do. My most favourite "dirty trick" of his is his explanation that the Hound of the Baskervilles glowed in the dark because his fur was painted with phosphorus. But phosphorus in poisonous and the dog would die if he wore something like that (and Doyle as the medical man new that fact quite well....).
Offline
Well, just my two cents: I read carefully what has been written the last two pages, the new comments pulling some CPR on the topic. And what bothers me seriously is the following: I feel that with this season and especially the character of Mary there's so much explanation needed. Fans watched, fans discussed, and I don't know when the comments were recorded but it's all a bit like: "Sorry, fans, we meant well. We meant to say this and that, in case you didn't know." I like good discussion, but reading what the makers wanted to plant into the fans heads feels for the first time inconsistent to me.
Offline
I understand her, Jason Orange was a hottie.. *nods earnestly*
Liberty wrote:
Sue: “That bit from Amanda just then, when she said, ‘Well, he’d have needed a confidant,’ that’s the first little slip-in that she wasn’t exactly what she seemed.”
Steven: “The idea was that you would like Mary because she was getting into the swing of the action so quickly and therefore [you] never questioned the fact that nobody really would – unless, of course, they weren’t what they really seemed to be; and she’s far too at ease with Sherlock Holmes and the way he behaves for a normal person.”
Sadly for me their plan didn´t really work.. because yes, nobody would really act that way, and that made the whole scene seem off and unconvincing. In hindsight I can see what they were going for, but all through TEH and TSoT I just felt Mary and her place in their new trio was unnatural. I never recovered from that feeling, and HLV didn´t really help matters.. *shrugs*
Last edited by Zatoichi (November 5, 2014 9:41 pm)
Offline
Do people think the TEH commentary helped?
Cos I did.
Offline
Mrshouse, I see what you mean. And I think it depends on what is going to come next. If we are to accept all this as it is shown, I have my difficulties to buy it. I believe that Sherlock accepts Mary, maybe even likes her, but I still cannot buy the whole surgery/forgiving thing. But the comment for HLV is not on arianedevere so I am going to wait until I can read it in full before saying more about that.
As for "I like it". It seems thin to me because it is counterbalanced by the word "liar". I could not forget the word throughout TEH and TSOT and kept wondering in which way she was a liar.
Last edited by SusiGo (November 5, 2014 9:44 pm)
Offline
Agree 100%, zatoichi.