Offline
maryagrawatson wrote:
Again, I was joking! OMG. I'm never doing that again!
Mary
We know (I think?) ;-)
But thanks for the reassurance ;-)
(still going to read that fanfic)
Offline
Whisky wrote:
We know (I think?) ;-)
Well, SOME of you do...
I don't have that fic bookmarked, sorry.
Mary
Online!
maryagrawatson wrote:
Again, I was joking! OMG. I'm never doing that again!
Mary
Yes, but we have to at least eliminate the impossible, don't we? I'm still enjoying trying to make it a possible in my head.
Offline
More sillier than being Sherlock's baby would be Mycroft's baby, these would be a shock i would never ever recover ....
*just kidding*
Offline
Whisky wrote:
besleybean wrote:
Believe me, I cannot even type the words ansd sounds needed to respond to this absurd premise.
I also think it's absurd, but after all, absurd theories are a fun way to pass time. (But then again, I'm always sure the writers somehow know what we're thinking and I really don't want them to get ideas like that... so maybe better not joke too much on it... they might just go for it, as seen in TEH ;) )
LOL, now you wrote it, so they will write it.
Sorry, I cannot give you a link. I stumbled over it some weeks ago. I ran out of recc'ed fics and searched AO3 for something to read. My search was very broad, just "Sherlock", and "sorted by date". I received a list of the most absurd pairings and plots.
The baby being Sherlock's was just one of them. I remember Lestrade/Mrs Hudson and a threesome with Sherlock, John and Mycroft.
Didn't read any of them.
Offline
I'm not listening!