Offline
Exactly.
Offline
Bankomas wrote:
Treatment is the key word.
And how would you treat Eurus?
Offline
I am not a top psychiatrist.
Though Sherlock seems to be doing a good job.
Offline
I believe, this is some sort of therapy for him too.
However Eurus is more difficult, psychiatrist already tried to help her, and they never succeed. It would be like to reprogram her brain, to work different - and I not mean to install new programs inside the operating system, but rather like to change ROM (Sherlock is not the only one, who likes the computer metaphors ;] ). She is not ill, really (to be cured), she simply thinks different.
Last edited by Naavy (January 19, 2017 8:20 pm)
Offline
Naavy wrote:
Bankomas wrote:
Treatment is the key word.
And how would you treat Eurus?
I already expressed my opinion on that. Post #30. An impossible job seems like a job for Sherlock.
Offline
Quite so.
Offline
Bankomas wrote:
I already expressed my opinion on that. Post #30. An impossible job seems like a job for Sherlock.
Maybe (just maybe) when she was five, she was still open enough, to change, but now?
And you are not right about the pleasure, she takes. Killing itself is not pleasant for her, but she never minded to kill, just because she had such whim. It is even worse.
Last edited by Naavy (January 19, 2017 8:35 pm)
Offline
Yes, it was more like she wanted to witness the psychological effect on people.
Offline
I agree with besleybean
Offline
Naavy wrote:
And you are not right about the pleasure, she takes. Killing itself is not pleasant for her, but she never minded to kill, just because she had such whim. It is even worse.
I never said she took pleasure in killing. Always stated the opposite
Offline
Bankomas wrote:
Naavy wrote:
And you are not right about the pleasure, she takes. Killing itself is not pleasant for her, but she never minded to kill, just because she had such whim. It is even worse.
I never said she took pleasure in killing. Always stated the opposite
I understood ;p
But my point is, she was able to kill in order to have even a smallest fun, or to sate her curiosity. To say nothing of rape (and murder together), she committed. She had no inner mechanisms, able to stop her, because she did not knew, how to differentiate between good and bad.
Offline
Naavy wrote:
I understood ;p
But my point is, she was able to kill in order to have even a smallest fun, or to sate her curiosity. To say nothing of rape (and murder together), she committed. She had no inner mechanisms, able to stop her, because she did not knew, how to differentiate between good and bad.
This no doubt.
Last edited by Bankomas (January 19, 2017 10:09 pm)