BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

General Benedict Appreciation » Favourite Sherlock/Benedict pictures » January 28, 2017 4:36 pm

Naavy
Replies: 42700

Go to post

BTW, about "stunning"... 


Perfect Bond?

General Benedict Appreciation » Favourite Sherlock/Benedict pictures » January 28, 2017 4:25 pm

Naavy
Replies: 42700

Go to post

ewige wrote:

May I just point out that I LOVE you signature, Phantom? He's so young... and curly

It's the same with me.  Never change the signature, plz.

The Final Problem » Questions about TFP » January 28, 2017 4:15 pm

Naavy
Replies: 434

Go to post

I doubt, he could be influential enough, to stop his parents from visiting Eurus - except they were already willing to do it because their own choice, and searched for excuse. And - when he was ready to feign Eurus'es death, they did not see her already for long time. I guess, they preferred to take care of Sherlock.

BTW I have a theory (again!). I thought a bit about it, and I imagine, before the murder Eurus was Mycroft's favorite sibling, not Sherlock. She was a year younger, but much more brilliant, and simply interesting (even, if bothering). And Eurus felt the same towards Mycroft - he had already some education, and was brilliant too. They understood each other. That's why Sherlock's needed to make friends with Victor ;>

Latest News » The Mofftiss Talk in Cambridge » January 28, 2017 1:51 pm

Naavy
Replies: 7

Go to post

My pleasure
I also think, Mark did not say the entire truth about Eurus...
But I like the part about the 5th season (there is a hope!), and about writing Mycroft's role - he was so perfect Mycroft, from very beginning, that I was sure, he created this character for himself. 

The Final Problem » Dr. Watson's deduction » January 28, 2017 1:37 pm

Naavy
Replies: 49

Go to post

I would say: "that side of communication with other people" ;] 

The Final Problem » Questions about TFP » January 28, 2017 1:28 pm

Naavy
Replies: 434

Go to post

They had to stop it very soon. Remember "You told us that our daughter was dead!", "Better that than tell you what she had become."? Just "tell", not "see".

But since my questions about uncle Rudy lead us either to creating a conspiracy theory, or to blaming Sherlock's parents, I believe, it is not funny anymore. I propose to discuss something else.

The Final Problem » Dr. Watson's deduction » January 28, 2017 1:10 pm

Naavy
Replies: 49

Go to post

I see, I need to explain my point... There are things, like getting married, or passing exams, when something must really happen, to make it valid. (You are not married, until both sides say "yes". Your intentions, feelings, knowledge, can't help - you must not skip this one, most important part of ceremony, or nothing happened.) I see the apology the same way, that's why i insisted, John should really say his "I am sorry". 
And - Sherlock in TEH expressed his regret (and it didn't help), but John never even tried. 
Sherlock forgave him, but it looks, like he is now the more sensitive man, who can better understand other people... A bit strange, isn't it? ;]

The Final Problem » Questions about TFP » January 28, 2017 12:42 pm

Naavy
Replies: 434

Go to post

But it had to be years later. I wonder, what happened before he fabricated this story.

The Final Problem » Questions about TFP » January 28, 2017 11:50 am

Naavy
Replies: 434

Go to post

besleybean wrote:

Possibly, but I honestly don't think there would have been that level of intrigue.

You are right, I started to create the conspiracy theory ;[
That's because they were so nice, when they were shown in the series. And suddenly we are to work out, they left their child in someone's else hands, and forgot? I don't like it.

The Final Problem » Questions about TFP » January 28, 2017 11:35 am

Naavy
Replies: 434

Go to post

besleybean wrote:

Sorry, typo!
I've been back and corrected it.
I meant she, as in Eurus.
Yes, I mean possibly Mycroft thought she was beyond saving.

THX!
But it means, the Holmes'es parents did not see any hope for her too? Did they ever tried to contact her?

...I wonder, maybe uncle Rudy wanted to use her skills for a government, like much later Mycroft did? In this case, uncle Rudy would be someone important in government too?
 

The Final Problem » Questions about TFP » January 28, 2017 11:29 am

Naavy
Replies: 434

Go to post

Meretricious wrote:

Naavy wrote:

I don't want to imagine, what could he feel, when all this story begun. He had to be in real shock too. His little, and brilliant, five years old sister become the murderess. Mycroft most likely was not even home this time ( I guess, he was in the best boarding school in UK ;]  - Sherlock said: "I went through the song, line by line all those years ago and I found nothing. I couldn't find anything!" and not even a word about Mycrotf's help), and he was in very sensible age of 13. Than he discovered, his younger, and even more sensible brother was traumatized so deeply, that he couldn't deal with it, and needed to push everything out of his memory... 

 
The flashback shows all three children sitting at the table as Eurus sings her song, so I think Mycroft was there at the time. Not sure why he didn't help Sherlock solve the puzzle. Maybe he didn't believe a little girl was capable of murder?

I imagine, he was earlier home, or he used to come home during vacation - he has some memories about it. But nor Sherlock, either Mycroft, say any word, he was home in the most important time. 
And I guess, if he was there, Eurus wouldn't feel so alone, and she woudln't kill.

The Final Problem » Questions about TFP » January 28, 2017 11:18 am

Naavy
Replies: 434

Go to post

besleybean wrote:

Maybe Mycroft thought he was irredeemable?

I just tried to find in the dictionary an another meaning of the word "irredeemable"... Because I don't see, why is it related with Mycroft... And I failed :/
Could you express it with another words, please?

The Final Problem » Questions about TFP » January 28, 2017 10:55 am

Naavy
Replies: 434

Go to post

Uncle Rudy - OK, but Mycroft?
I don't want to imagine, what could he feel, when all this story begun. He had to be in real shock too. His little, and brilliant, five years old sister become the murderess. Mycroft most likely was not even home this time ( I guess, he was in the best boarding school in UK ;]  - Sherlock said: "I went through the song, line by line all those years ago and I found nothing. I couldn't find anything!" and not even a word about Mycrotf's help), and he was in very sensible age of 13. Than he discovered, his younger, and even more sensible brother was traumatized so deeply, that he couldn't deal with it, and needed to push everything out of his memory... 
Certainly, Mycrot was very strong, but it looks, like his parents were able to live normally after some time. Why they never tried and regained the control on Eurus'es live?

The Final Problem » Theories, connected with "Sherlock" » January 28, 2017 10:32 am

Naavy
Replies: 21

Go to post

Schmiezi wrote:

No, the theory does not have to be true to be fun and interesting. :-D

Schmiezi, Thank You!

The Final Problem » Theories, connected with "Sherlock" » January 28, 2017 10:15 am

Naavy
Replies: 21

Go to post

ewige wrote:

I have nothing clever to add to that, but what do you mean "continuity errors with the lamps", Rache?

I can answer it too In the beginning, in Baker Street, when Mycrotf talks his first Redbeard and Eurus story, the lamps are sometimes on, and sometimes off. I think, this is really the continuity error (ok, let's say: it is my opinion in 99% ;] ).

But (finally, I understand...), OMG, it is not the point!

I wrote "I believe, this thread can be interesting and entertaining", but I never said, I think, this theory is true!
It's based on pretty many correct observations, it is created by very perceptive, inventive person. It's ingenious, and it can explain some still unexplained details, or answer unanswered questions. It is very good theory (on the more abstract level).
Really, needs it to be also truth, to enjoy it??

There are many theories, based on assumption, something is not real ( take a look, plz: http://fkngerlocked.tumblr.com/post/156286605281/emanuelleismyname-its-for-men-was-it-all-in - all this blog is interesting!).

But in this topic - I hoped for sort of mind game, with the best of the theories...   

BTW more about "The Girl Is John" theory: 
http://fkngerlocked.tumblr.com/post/156088825386/this-is-an-additional-post-to-my-eurus-shot-john  
http://fkngerlocked.tumblr.com/post/156109518291/aaand-another-addition-to-my-john-is-the-girl-on  
Just as a mental exercise, too...

Other » (more than one eye colour) central heterochromia??? » January 27, 2017 10:50 pm

Naavy
Replies: 25

Go to post

...And to come back to the interesting subject...



Turquoise?

Other » (more than one eye colour) central heterochromia??? » January 27, 2017 10:25 pm

Naavy
Replies: 25

Go to post

The rings are present, and not two, but three - only not light and dark colors, like green and brown, just dark ones. 
However, it doesn't really matter - in normal light it is simply slightly transparent black... I asked only out of curiosity.

Edit: But there is no brown... Rather very, very dark greenish, and very, very dark greyish black ;]
No chance to make a photo with normal camera.

Fan Art » Fan art » January 27, 2017 9:48 pm

Naavy
Replies: 1779

Go to post

It is still some time to Valentines, but if someone want to use these picture, like the author offers, maybe it's better to have some time, to prepare everything in no hurry.
I didn't find it in forum, but Google can make mistakes too. So either the picture is here to be shown, or to be reminded...


Source: http://www.deviantart.com/art/BBC-Sherlock-Valentines-284791224

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum