BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

Character Analysis » Did Moftiss „assassinate“ Sherlock as a character? » January 3, 2016 3:11 pm

falsedoor
Replies: 151

Go to post

You seem to ask, after a clarification: is there a reason in the writing for Sherlock being called by negative epithets?

Well, in the show he is called: freak, psychopath, arrogant sod. 

He is not a freak or a psychopath, but he is an arrogant sod.

I also don't agree when you say that Sherlock has vices, not flaws. Smoking is a vice. Arrogance is a flaw. 

Anyway, then you go on to post links to some very interesting blogposts about how Sherlock has had to change who he is to deserve love. Both very interesting, but I don't see what they have to do with your original question. I'll just say that yes, it does seem like Sherlock has had to progress to become more "normal" to deserve love. Many will probably argue that Sherlock is just maturing, being more sensitive etc. In TAB John pretty much said it's not human to to be disinterested in romance, to not have "impulses",as he puts it, and that Sherlock is greatly flawed because of that of all things. When he asks: What made you like this? He doesn't ask: why are you so rude and arrogant? He asks: why don't you want a girlfriend/relationship?
Sherlock doesn't reject friendship. not even close friendship. But somehow, the fact that he rejects conventional romance is seen as inhuman, the show implies it means Sherlock won't let anybody close to him. But, he does let John close to him, but that is just not enough. Sherlock needs to settle down, commit romantically, to be considered human. With him and John it was clearly a case of John just being a kind of Mr. Right (platonic or romantic, up to you). Someone who, initially anyway, accepted Sherlock as he was, and even needed him to be the way he was. If Sherlock isn't asexual, then the lack of romantic attachments is most likely because that Miss Right hasn't showed up in the same way, so I don't see why John had to be such a bully about it. But I digress. 

But I suppose Sherlock has been character assasinated, for I don't see that Sherlock in the canon either. I j

Series Three Reviews » Least favourable fan review of S3 I've read so far... » December 31, 2015 9:11 am

falsedoor
Replies: 115

Go to post

I love to read unfavourable reviews. Don't get me wrong, I am a fan of the show, it's why I'm here. But there are things worth critisising and it really bugs me when nobody is willing to do so. Nothing is flawless. One has to analyse something very closely to find so many flaws, it shows great enthusiasm although the writer apparently has stopped watching altogether now.

The author highlighted seveal things that, although they're true, don't really bother me. There is a lot of fanservice, types of fanservice I didn't think of as fanservice. The family christmas dinner, sibling rivalry between Sherlock and Mycroft, kidlock, Sherlock playing with a dog. Just sort of there for emotional weight than for any genuine relevance. As a fanfiction writer I know how fun it is to write these things, but scenes like this would have no place in old-school-Sherlock (S1). 

I can forgive plotholes, because many episodes have them (It was a supernova my ass!). What really bugs me is the so called "character development". People throw around that phrase too lightly. There is development, and there is acting completely OOC. Sherlock has shown examples of both. In some instances it can boil down to opinion, but Anderson? That is not development, that is... I don't even know what that was. I fall for a lot of the cheaper jokes (I am sorry, but the I'm Not Gay gag doesn't really bug me as much as it should), but I can't say I liked that aspect much at all. Anderson didn't need to be a fan for me to like him as a character, I liked him fine as he was, I don't want everybody to be sucking up to Sherlock and elevate him to Gary Stu status! 

The bomb disposal scene was just weird. That really did have fanfiction all over. Put there for no good reason than to explore two character's interactions in a given situation. Utterly pointless. I honestly did not like it. But there were scenes I liked. TEH was pretty fifty fifty. HLV sort of compensated for the exagerrated humour in previous episo

Series Four Suggestions & Ideas » could Sherlock have fallen for Mary » December 31, 2015 8:13 am

falsedoor
Replies: 38

Go to post

Everybody is in love with everybody in the fanon and there is support for all ships.

So really, Sherlock is in love with Mary, Molly, Janine, Irene, anybody you wish, even women! 

Although I like Mary, the same way I like Jim, I couldn't ship her and Sherlock, she's too parent-figur-y I think. They don't have that sort of chemistry, Mary is too dominant (although not the same way Irene is dominant) I don't like it, but Janine is a better female romantic candidate. I do like Janine, I just don't like the idea of Sherlock being romantic. 

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum