BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

Reichenbach Theories » The Fall? Or Not? » December 28, 2012 10:03 pm

arkemiffo
Replies: 9

Go to post

Ok, I dont have any solid theory, I did however find one thing strange. When we see people rushing in to him, from an overhead view, the position of the body wasnt in a position I would expect from a fall. He's on his side, with one leg pointing from him. Just from a fall I would expect the body to be flat on the back or the stomach, and both legs pointing straight down (as if you're just lying in bed). His position looks like he's been rolled onto the street, so that one leg is chuffed out, therefore stopping the body to fulfill the comlete roll over to the stomach.

I'm not sure about this though. It's basically CSI type stuff, and it might not mean anything at all.

A Study In Pink » How did Sherlock do mobile phone trick? » December 28, 2012 9:29 pm

arkemiffo
Replies: 24

Go to post

More intreresting is that the normal text is delivered within a minute, but next to never instantanously. It normally takes 10-30 secs for a text to arrive.


SPOILER



They use that delay to great effect twice in A scandal in Belgravia where Irene texts to Sherlock, has a quick conversation with John, and then hear Sherlock phone beeping (moaning). Its also used at the end where she texts him, preperes to be beheaded, and then 10 secs after you hear Sherlock s phone.

The Reichenbach Fall » Why did Moriarty kill himself? » June 10, 2012 11:10 pm

arkemiffo
Replies: 104

Go to post

As I saw it, it was because he realized Sherlock was not a "normal" person any more. He simply had to step up his game even more, and the only way to win over Sherlock at that given time was to bite the bullet.
That's why he says "Thank you" several times just before he shoots himself. Because he came to the understanding that he was actually dealing with a worthy foe this time, even if he had his doubts before, he didn't any more.

The Reichenbach Fall » 1972 » June 10, 2012 10:54 pm

arkemiffo
Replies: 17

Go to post

Actually I think we get some more clues if we look at the entire context of the discussion John and Mycroft has.

M: "Tradition John. They define us"
J: "So total silence is traditional, is it?"
J: "You can't even say Pass the sugar"
M: "Three quarters of the diplomatic services and half of the government front bench all sharing the same tea trolley?"
M: "It's for the best, believe me. They don't want a repeat of 1972"

Now, to me it sounds more like an internal embarrassement for the British government. That different departments went head to head against each other. I'm not that good in political history, so I simply don't know what they would be referring to, but I don't think it was the athlete massacre or Bloody Sunday, as none of them was a direct cause of internal governmental fighting.

The Science Of Deduction » So can you break it? » March 6, 2012 4:33 pm

arkemiffo
Replies: 37

Go to post

Very good chipher.

The first thing I thought of when looking at it though was just hexadecimal (16 based scale), since hexadecimals are written in groups of 2's, so my guess was that it was ASCII codes translated to hexadecimals, and then applying the normal ceasar chipher to it to make it into "normal" letters instead of codes.

Well, I wasnt that far off anyway in my initial thoughts, but I see that its already been cracked so.

A Study In Pink » Which pill was the poisonous one?? » February 22, 2012 6:03 pm

arkemiffo
Replies: 144

Go to post

Well, as I said, the Cabbie knows which pill is which. Otherwise he might as well play russian roulette, and thats not very fun, or smart is it?
The clever part is that he gets people to take the wrong pill (its a game of pure chance from the victims point of view), by influincing their choices.
The premise is just like the shell game (as stated in another thread), but without the marker being know to the victim, only the cabbie. The actual game is then for the cabbie to make sure the victim take the poison, and not the sugarpill.

Personally I dont think Sherlock would have taken it. Even though he likes to play it close to the edge, that would have been a bit too close. He also dont like pure chance.

Other Adaptations » Guy Ritchie Sherlock Movies » February 22, 2012 12:51 pm

arkemiffo
Replies: 41

Go to post

To be honest, it doest feel like Sherlock at all.
It feels more like "Tony Stark set in victorian London".

While Robert Downey Jr. is a funny guy, he plays the same type of character in whatever he is atm, just riding the wave.

I think however the second film was better than the first one, but that doesnt say much for it either I'm afraid.

A Study In Pink » Which pill was the poisonous one?? » February 22, 2012 12:20 pm

arkemiffo
Replies: 144

Go to post

Yes, absolutely. The *CABBIE* knows.
WE on the other hand is who I'm reffering to here. We have no way of knowing this.
In the shell game it is stated where the marker is, and we can follow it, but in this game we do not have such a marker, so its a guessing game. With 2 pills we always have 50/50 to get the right one.

A Study In Pink » How did Sherlock do mobile phone trick? » February 21, 2012 5:34 pm

arkemiffo
Replies: 24

Go to post

Ok, here comes my take on it.
Technically it would be fairly easy, but with a big caveat.
This requires hacking into the phone system.

Given that he knows where Lestrades phone is (at the press conference as he knew Lestrade would be there), a simple triangulation by the mast connection would give all locations of the phones that are connected to those masts. From that he can simply surmise that the attendees will be within a certain proximity of Lestrades phone, specially if they are all clustered (to avoid phones on another room and such) and send a text to all those phones.

We know however that Sherlock is at least adapt with some computer skills (he breaks Watsons password). It is quite a step to go to being able to hack the phone network though, so its a big nut to swallow, but I believe that would be the best way to be able to send to all the phones in one room.

Another way would require to know who was present, which he of course could get from the newspapers if he had contacts there, but he would have to know all the papers attending. Even if this would be the easiest technically (no technical knowledge required), it would be harder to get all of the numbers of all the phones in that room.

A Study In Pink » Which pill was the poisonous one?? » February 21, 2012 5:24 pm

arkemiffo
Replies: 144

Go to post

Personally I believe there is no way to determine which one was which by the action of the cabbie as we saw it.
There is simply no way for us to know if he was bluffing / double bluffing / triple bluffing at any given game played.

The game was played (imo) by letting the victim take part of body language, subtexts of what was said and so on, so the cabbie controlled which one was taken. There is no such notion that everyone will without a doubt take the same pill given the same settings. Some will think he was bluffing, some will think he was double bluffing and so on. I took the "I know how people think" comment as the cabbie could control the victims choices. Not that he knew what pill they would have taken would he been absolutely still (after the first "move"), and quiet.

A Study In Pink » Mistakes - anyone notice any? » February 21, 2012 5:09 pm

arkemiffo
Replies: 52

Go to post

Ok, one thing I reacted to when rewatching the episode.
Now its been a bout a month+ since I watched it the last time though so my memory can be blurred/incorrect.

In the intro we see the victims in distress taking the pills, but the pills are in a small vial with 2 pills in it.
This would mean either that the cabbie is lying to Sherlock in the end, that he was cheating with an antidote, and poisoning the victims even if they chose the correct one, and he's simply not so smart as he portrais himself. As there is no visual cues on the pills, and no way of telling them apart he simply wouldnt know which one was the poison and which one was the sugarpill. He also coulnt have played the game as he did with Sherlock as he wouldnt be able to put them on the table, and influence their choices with body language, subtexts and so on that he tries to with Sherlock.
or
its a mistake from Mr. Moffat and co.

It is of course possible he had containers with 2 pills of the same type in each, so he brings a total of 4 pills to each victim, but that just sounds redundant to me, and unlikely.

Introductions Please... » 'Ello all » February 21, 2012 4:42 pm

arkemiffo
Replies: 7

Go to post

Hi everyone

Thought I'd introduce myself, as the topic states.

Swede living in Ireland since about 8 years here.
Started reading Sherlock when I was a kid...I'd say about 7-8 year or something. Since its nearly 3 decades since I cant really remember.

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum