ANDERSON: moron or good cop?

Skip to: New Posts  Last Post
Posted by BHavers
January 31, 2015 5:31 pm
#1

Anderson is an interesting character, evolving a lot from season 1 to season 3.
I've added a post on my blog about him :
http://mrpunchline.blogspot.fr/2015/01/philip-anderson.html

What's your opinion ?


--------------------------------------------------------------
What? Cameras? Here? I'm in my nightie!
 
Posted by SusiGo
January 31, 2015 5:40 pm
#2

I think Anderson's story arc from series 1 to 3 is wonderful. From Sherlock's initial "He won't work with me" via the charged banter between, Anderson's part in Sherlock's downfall, his change of heart, founding The Empty Hearse and finally him being included as a forensics expert in Sherlock's mind palace in HLV is cleverly done. 

It shows how you can give depth to an initially unlikeable. Kudos to the writers. 


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 
Posted by BHavers
January 31, 2015 5:43 pm
#3

SusiGo wrote:

It shows how you can give depth to an initially unlikeable. Kudos to the writers. 

Yep, exactly! they're really good. It changes from conventional characters
 


--------------------------------------------------------------
What? Cameras? Here? I'm in my nightie!
 
Posted by Liberty
January 31, 2015 6:35 pm
#4

I don't think he's a moron.  He just isn't in Sherlock's class (but who is?).  I think he and Sally persecute Sherlock over because of a genuine belief that he's dangerous (rather than for revenge).   Sherlock hasn't really helped his case by being continually rude to them.  He has tried to present himself as a possible psychopath, so it's not surprisingly that Anderson has genuine doubts about him. 

But then, as you say, he doesn't take things at face value - he thinks, questions and wonders, looks for evidence and clues and comes up with ideas.   It's interesting what you say about Sherlock noticing him - that's true.  He didn't dismiss him.  He singled him out for attention at some points (negative attention, maybe).   Sherlock obviously knows he's much cleverer than Anderson, so was it just him having fun taunting somebody "weaker" or was there a little bit of rivalry and showing off going on, because Sherlock noticed that Anderson wasn't a moron at all?

 


 
Main page
Login
Desktop format