There are screen caps of those around: as I remember it they included John Watson, opium, redbeard, Moriary and Irene Adler, with 'see file' after the last 3.

There's at least one other.

I mentioned them in a review I posted on my LiveJournal a while ago, so let me paste that bit:

And let us admire all of Sherlock’s pressure points for a moment. Irene Adler. Jim Moriarty. Redbeard. Hounds of the Baskerville. Opium. John Watson. “There’s rather a lot,” Magnussen says. No, there’s not. It just repeats ten times in scrolling. I’m not sure why exactly.

Thank you all for such prompt & intriguing replies that now births a question: why is "Hounds..." a pressure point since he solved that case?

Yes, the drug made him confront his own fears. And Moriarty was among them. In the mind palace scene we see that he still occupies his mind. 

Baskerville symbolises his fear to lose his mind or his intellect. He said it himself that he was not exactly afraid of a dog but that he felt doubt. Not being able or questioning whether you are able to trust your own senses can be horrific experience.
What can CAM know about that?
It's written down for everyone to read on John's blog.

"The next morning, I met up with Sherlock and we discussed the previous evening. He admitted that as well as fear, the worst thing he'd felt was doubt. He'd never doubted himself before and he simply couldn't understand how he'd seen what he'd seen."

According to canon Holmes censered Watson. Watson wrote that he was not allowed to write about a story for some time. I expected that Sherlock would finally put his foot down and tell John what to write and what better not to mention. It's not exactly a good idea to tell the world about the weaknesses of a friend who has to live with criminals and gets death threats all the time (according to TSotT on the bench).

Be wrote:

Baskerville symbolises his fear to lose his mind or his intellect. He said it himself that he was not exactly afraid of a dog but that he felt doubt. Not being able or questioning whether you are able to trust your own senses can be horrific experience.
What can CAM know about that?
It's written down for everyone to read on John's blog.

"The next morning, I met up with Sherlock and we discussed the previous evening. He admitted that as well as fear, the worst thing he'd felt was doubt. He'd never doubted himself before and he simply couldn't understand how he'd seen what he'd seen."

"Be"...are you in psychological studies?
I find that your comments show a depth of insight rarely seen...thank you!
All things considered, what you stated makes perfect sense.
It helps to quiet that gaping maw of constant query within, that seems, at times, insatiable...!
(still longing for "spell-check" on this site!).



According to canon Holmes censered Watson. Watson wrote that he was not allowed to write about a story for some time. I expected that Sherlock would finally put his foot down and tell John what to write and what better not to mention. It's not exactly a good idea to tell the world about the weaknesses of a friend who has to live with criminals and gets death threats all the time (according to TSotT on the bench).

Harobed, thank you. And no, I'm not into psychology. I just look at it.

CAM admits that Sherlock wouldn't care enough about keeping his drug habits a secret to cooperate with CAM in exchange for it not being exposed.

On the surface, it wouldn't seem like Sherlock could be blackmailed, in the sense that CAM did to Lady Smallwood, over anything. He doesn't seem to really care about having a public image for morality, or anything.  And Scotland Yard seems to know about his...darker side and continue working with him anyway. I think if CAM were going to hurt Sherlock's reputation, it would have to be by making him look guilty of something criminal or terroristic, such that he couldn't be seen as an ally of Scotland Yard. Much as Moriarty did. BUT Sherlock is known to bend if not break the law, including his gaining entrance into CAM's own office...

The bonfire thing suggests that CAM thought that for Sherlock, he had to use "pressure" of another kind - threatening to hurt the one person Sherlock cares about, in a more physical sense.

But I do wonder about Irene as a pressure point..CAM could have just meant she is another person Sherlock cares about, whom he could threatend to ham...but if Sherlock and she ever "had dinner," I'd be surprised if CAM didn't find out. And he could twist that one into "Sherlock consorted with a terrorist," or perhaps, "Sherlock will protect any woman, no matter what she's done, if she'll 'have dinner' with him."

What I wonder is, would this consideration - of how it would look - have deterred Sherlock at the time from "having dinner" with Irene, if, as some have suggested, she offered it after he saved her?

 

Brilliant psychoanalysis, all!
Wow...I'm a mere pedestrian & a bit of a "newbie" here, so I'll lay-low on commenting any further until I've had a chance to re-study the episodes!
(again...WHY don't they have "spell-check" here????)
[ha,ha!]