Offline
Frankly, it is ridiculous. Why they ever thought this latest 'trick' was a good idea heaven only knows! Such a shame because, you know, JLM is actually a fanbloodytastic actor!
Offline
Sherlock and only Sherlock!!! Sorry for fans of Elementary, but I can't watch it. Sherlock has to be English. Sorry... ;)
Offline
Well, I'm now all caught up on Elementary, and in the end I found it not so bad. The pilot gave me a really bad impression, I found it really boring, compared to the fireworks of emotions that Sherlock gave me : thrill, fear, laughter, foreboding, etc etc, Elementary really fell flat compared to that and JLM felt like an actor playing Sherlock, not like Sherlock.
But as the episodes went on, I became more attached to the characters, I like Gregson and Bell, and really enjoyed Moran. Watson's career change and the way she evolves is also something I found interesting. Sherlock himself, I got used to, and didn't find him sounding too fake anymore like I did at the beginning. Of course I like Sherlock much better, but while waiting, I found Elementary quite entertaining. There were even moments that made me laugh out loud.
I have a friend who says he's good at anticipating the way shows will go, and he says Mycroft will turn out to be Sherlock's father in Elementary.
Offline
Zann wrote:
Sherlock and only Sherlock!!! Sorry for fans of Elementary, but I can't watch it. Sherlock has to be English. Sorry... ;)
The Elementary Sherlock *is* English.
Offline
I finally got around to watching some episodes of Elementary. I will fully admit my bias here, because it's difficult not to compare the two- and "Sherlock" is one of my favorite shows still running. Purely on its own, Elementary is a decent-good police procedural. It's very much like other shows of its genre (CSI, NCIS, Law & Order, etc)- and I don't really see much about Sherlock Holmes himself that makes the show stand out from those other shows. I like Watson fine as a woman, but to be honest, I'm not sure why she stays with Holmes- after knowing him one or two days, he purposely crashes her car as part of a temper tantrum. It feels like she's babysitting him more than her being his assistant. Which brings me to Holmes himself...I don't like how his character is portrayed. His character is too immature, crazy and co-dependent for my tastes (even for a recovering drug-addict). And it's not just because he's Holmes...if he name were "Bill", I will still think all of the above. He's portrayed as the "eccentric genius" by tattoos, drugs and the way he acts...which reminded me too much of Abby Sciuto in NCIS.
I would like to qualify all of this by saying that I have absolutely no problem with re-inventing Holmes, putting him an America, or even making Watson a woman. I guess I was disappointed that he himself was such an uninteresting character, and I couldn't find myself liking him at all. But if you like the show, that's great- my mom likes it, and I've never tried to convince her not to. I did show her the BBC version, and she liked it, too. So I think there is room for both. I just wish I had liked it so as to have something to pass the time with.
Last edited by sj4iy (June 20, 2013 1:05 pm)
Offline
I think they kept the tattoos because otherwise JLM would have had to have had them covered up in some way for every episode (which is a bit of a pain).
Offline
Davina wrote:
I think they kept the tattoos because otherwise JLM would have had to have had them covered up in some way for every episode (which is a bit of a pain).
Oh, I understand why they did it...I guess I just wanted to like his version of Sherlock, and I really haven't found myself doing so up to this point. He just doesn't look, feel or act like what I expected ^^
Offline
sj4iy wrote:
.I guess I just wanted to like his version of Sherlock, and I really haven't found myself doing so up to this point. He just doesn't look, feel or act like what I expected ^^
I don't think one of the premises of the show is for him to be likable or someone we're supposed to sympathize with. He's supposed to be prickly, off-putting, and (to put a fine spin on it) just plain weird. In that, the actor did a fine job. I don't think he's attractive or anyone I would care to know in real life. And I agree with whoever said earlier that they wondered why Joan puts up with him (except that she has to because, again, that's what the show calls for). Any real life Joan would have told him to go f himself, and she'd have been long gone by now.
Offline
ancientsgate wrote:
sj4iy wrote:
.I guess I just wanted to like his version of Sherlock, and I really haven't found myself doing so up to this point. He just doesn't look, feel or act like what I expected ^^
I don't think one of the premises of the show is for him to be likable or someone we're supposed to sympathize with. He's supposed to be prickly, off-putting, and (to put a fine spin on it) just plain weird. In that, the actor did a fine job. I don't think he's attractive or anyone I would care to know in real life. And I agree with whoever said earlier that they wondered why Joan puts up with him (except that she has to because, again, that's what the show calls for). Any real life Joan would have told him to go f himself, and she'd have been long gone by now.
I think it was me who was wondering why she puts up with him a few posts back XD
I guess my thing is this- my dad was an alcoholic, and he never got his life together before he died at the age of 54. He was always dependent on others to keep him out of trouble, but he was an amazingly talented singer, songwriter, guitarist and poet. He let that all go to waste because he couldn't get control of his alcoholism, and then died of withdrawal in a halfway house when I was 22. When I watch Sherlock Holmes, I'm not expecting to deal with someone like that. It makes it really hard to root for a protagonist like that when I've dealt with it on my own.
Last edited by sj4iy (June 20, 2013 9:57 pm)
Offline
sj4iy wrote:
Oh, I didn't mean that way...I meant like his character's story. I can't root for the guy- and I usually love stories about a**hole protagonists. He's just dull.
He is, and I think he was deliberately portrayed that way. I want to root for him, and I usually do anyway, but the show makes it real hard to get on his side. We're left with the choice of getting on the side of the bad guy of the week or of getting on the side of our character, one who's deliberately been made unappealling.
It's funny, because the BBC Sherlock is also written/portrayed to be unappealing, but IMO it's Ben that shines through that. He's such a fabulous actor, he shows us his Sherlock in all his subtleties-- beyond the shouting and acting out and saying inappropriate things, he has a heart under there. Maybe it's only an intellectual challenge for him to help individuals and society at large, but it still touches the viewer emotionally.
And TPTB at the BBC also made a conscious decision to allow him to be physically attractive, so "our" Sherlock is always shaven, clean, hair fixed, nice clothes. The Elementary Sherlock looks like he just got sprung from Riker's this morning. Ugh. Does that make me shallow, that I like men to be clean and to have shaved this week, etc? If so, so be it.
Offline
sj4iy wrote:
I guess my thing is this- my dad was an alcoholic, and he never got his life together before he died at the age of 54. He was always dependent on others to keep him out of trouble, but he was an amazingly talented singer, songwriter, guitarist and poet. He let that all go to waste because he couldn't get control of his alcoholism, and then died of withdrawal in a halfway house when I was 22. When I watch Sherlock Holmes, I'm not expecting to deal with someone like that. It makes it really hard to root for a protagonist like that when I've dealt with it on my own.
It strikes too close to home for you, literally. I'm surprised you can watch! Some things are just plain not entertaining, IMO, and sometimes I go diving for the power button on my TV remote for that reason. Either they strike too close to home, or they feel too much like I've lain down with the dogs on pupose and am now catching their fleas, or just ugh in some way. Maybe we all need to "vote" with our power buttons more often!
Offline
ancientsgate wrote:
It strikes too close to home for you, literally. I'm surprised you can watch! Some things are just plain not entertaining, IMO, and sometimes I go diving for the power button on my TV remote for that reason. Either they strike too close to home, or they feel too much like I've lain down with the dogs on pupose and am now catching their fleas, or just ugh in some way. Maybe we all need to "vote" with our power buttons more often!
Well, since I've only watched in on the internet so far, I guess I haven't voted at all, lol. I guess I'll sum it up- Sherlock the crime fighter is awesome, Sherlock the recovering addict, been there, done that, bought the cemetery plot. Really, the one show that has really gotten to me so far was the episode in Doctor Who about Vincent van Gogh. Man, was I sobbing at the end of that one, lol.
Offline
I watched the 4.5 min trailer for it yesterday and was left feeling rather meh. I mean, it didn't feel like Sherlock Holmes up-dated in any shape or form, aside from the names. I mean why did they make John a woman? Can Americans not cope with a partnership devoid of potential hot sex? (steady now Johnlockers).
Offline
Elvina wrote:
I watched the 4.5 min trailer for it yesterday and was left feeling rather meh. I mean, it didn't feel like Sherlock Holmes up-dated in any shape or form, aside from the names. I mean why did they make John a woman? Can Americans not cope with a partnership devoid of potential hot sex? (steady now Johnlockers).
I'm an American AND a Johnlocker, lolol. So I dunno what in heck "regular" Americans cope with and what they don't. I do know that prime time network TV is almost solely aimed at the male 18-35 crowd. So.... if you're female, you're out. If you're over 35, you're out. What you think or cope with does not matter, unless you're male and young. Everything on prime time network TV in the US is profit-driven by the advertisers who are out to get that male 18-35 crowd. Everything. No exceptions.
When I first heard that John would be Joan, I jumped to the conclusion that they would be in bed together within the first 2 episodes, but it hasn't happened. I think she's now carrying a torch for that tortured man (play on words.... aren't I clever? heh) At least it seems that way. But so far, he's blind to it. As Sherlock should be.
Now having seen the entire first season, I would advise anyone who thinks they might be interested to watch the whole season. Grit your teeth, dive in, and watch everything in order, first to last. It got way more interesting towards the end of the season IMO, and it was as if the two main actors had finally found their strides and were making us believe it. At first, not so much, but by the end of the season, at least I wasn't hating it, anyway. *smile*
Offline
Hello!
I finished watching the first season of Elementary last week because it airs a couple months behind in South America and I didn't care enough to dowload it. I liked it overall. I think the second half of the season was better (meaning more fun) than the first half but the last two episodes ("The Woman" and "Heroine") were CRAP. I hated the way they used the whole Irene/Moriarty story. Terrible.
I think that the main problem in Elementary is the awful writing. It's unfair to compare a 3-episodes-every-2-years series with one that has to deliver 24 episodes a year but Elementary's stories are bad even compared with other procedural shows like Criminal Minds or The Mentalist. I can solve most of the cases so I can't imagine why it takes Sherlock so long to figure out who is the killer/criminal.
Also, for me, the Sherlock Holmes in Elementary is not "the" Sherlock Holmes. I mean, he might be a character inspired in Sherlock Holmes but he certainly isn't ACD's Holmes. Not even an updated version. I don't know if it's the right word but I think JLM's Sherlock is too likable to be the "real" Sherlock Holmes. Besides BC's incarnation I think the closest modern day version of Holmes I can think of is House MD's Gregory House. You may like him on TV but you wouldn't live with him. Not in a million years.
Despite everything said before, I do like JLM's character (even if he isn't the "real" Sherlock Holmes) and Lucy Liu's Watson. Thumbs up to the show runners for not writing a romantic interest between them. I totally believe their relationship to be purely platonic. Some people think that there is no chemistry between JLM and LL but I disagree. I think there is a lot of chemistry between them (in fact that chemestry is what makes the show watchable) but there isn't sexual tension.
What I find quite interesting is that loads of Sherlock fans would love to see Sherlock and John romantically involved while every time I read something about Elementary most of the people who post comments don't want a romance between Sherlock and Joan. What do you think?
Offline
I was discussing Elementary again with some friends last night, and we found something we agreed on and for us somehow summed it up. We were talking about Charles Augustus Milverton and how he could be adapted in Sherlock, and tried to remember how the story had been treated in Elementary, and we just couldn't. We remembered there had been an episode about him but we couldn't remember the plot details. And then we realized that apart from a few strong moments with Moran or with Irene, we can't remember the stories told in Elementary, we see them, then we forget them. They don't make an impression like Sherlock does. They are forgettable. But we agreed that it's still something to watch and occupy us between 2 seasons of Sherlock...
Offline
I only remember a few plot twists in elementary. But honestly, somehow every episode resembles the next. There's a crime, JLM's Holmes has a theory and is certain about that, the police is going to arrest the accused, then Holmes acknowledges he was wrong and comes up with the right solution. At least this was the case in 50% of all episodes in the first series.
Offline
Swanpride wrote:
I honestly think that there are better shows to occupy me between the seasons of Sherlock. And I honestly would rather rewatch Sherlock or hunt for references in the stories than wasting one minute of my time with Elementary. Currently, I'm rewatching the Basil Rathbone movies for research purposes, and then I'll move on to every acclaimed adaptation I can get my hands on.
Yep. Especially for people who love the BBC show for the character intereaction and chemistry of the entire cast, there are great shows where DVDs can be checked out from libraries or put in Netflix
Dr. Who (especially David Tennant)
People can add Bones and House are characters loosely Based on Sherlock Holmes with great ensemble casts, Heck the Character of Bones is a Sherlock like woman who goes on logic and pulls of the "nicer" version of the normally cold Sherlock better than Elementary.
I recommend Angel, especially the second season if you like the character interaction on Sherlock. There's Angel, the brooding vampire with a soul, seekinf redemption, and he's also kind of a dork. There's the nerdy/uptight Wesley. The cheerleader/shop girl Cordelia, and the street smart Gunn. Watching those four interact and react to one another makes for some great comedy and compelling drama. And they form a strong friendship.
Offline
josabby wrote:
Swanpride wrote:
I honestly think that there are better shows to occupy me between the seasons of Sherlock. And I honestly would rather rewatch Sherlock or hunt for references in the stories than wasting one minute of my time with Elementary. Currently, I'm rewatching the Basil Rathbone movies for research purposes, and then I'll move on to every acclaimed adaptation I can get my hands on.
Yep. Especially for people who love the BBC show for the character intereaction and chemistry of the entire cast, there are great shows where DVDs can be checked out from libraries or put in Netflix
Dr. Who (especially David Tennant)
People can add Bones and House are characters loosely Based on Sherlock Holmes with great ensemble casts, Heck the Character of Bones is a Sherlock like woman who goes on logic and pulls of the "nicer" version of the normally cold Sherlock better than Elementary.
I recommend Angel, especially the second season if you like the character interaction on Sherlock. There's Angel, the brooding vampire with a soul, seekinf redemption, and he's also kind of a dork. There's the nerdy/uptight Wesley. The cheerleader/shop girl Cordelia, and the street smart Gunn. Watching those four interact and react to one another makes for some great comedy and compelling drama. And they form a strong friendship.
Matt Smith is absolutely awesome, too, and series 5 is a great place to if someone doesn't want to go all the way back. Honestly, I thought series 1 and 2 were awful with a couple of good episodes. Series 3 and 4 were much better, and Series 5 was easily the best of NuWho. Series 6 and 7 depend on having watched 5.
Last edited by sj4iy (August 8, 2013 10:12 pm)
Offline
I love Matt Smith too, Tennant's just my favorite.