Offline
Lots of people were freaking out earlier because they'd seen a picture of a Sherlock dummy and thought that was part of the solution but when you read that Sun article it says they used a dummy for some of the more dangerous stunt shots, so it was actually a filming prop not a Sherlock-survival prop.
Offline
anyway I don´t want to know. I just wonder what the people hunting for spoilers will do while watching - saying "I knew that before" all the time?
Offline
Mrs.Wenceslas wrote:
anyway I don´t want to know. I just wonder what the people hunting for spoilers will do while watching - saying "I knew that before" all the time?
Yeah, I know, that's crazy right?
For me there's two types of spoiler:
Type A - encourages speculation, theories, discussion, debate, raises excitement, gives hints
Type B - actually tells you exactly what's going to happen and literally "spoils" the episode or series for you.
I don't mind Type A, which is what we have in the above article, and what we had in the official press articles regarding the bonfire but anything beyond that is a bit too much...
Offline
I hadn't even seen the dummy!
Re spoilers: I just know from last time, they didn't really tell me anything about series 2 anyway.
But if I happen to see anything I don't want to... I honestly can live with it. It's no big deal.
I've already seen 4 things I don't want to.
But one of them I knew was gonna happen in the series, another I have predicted, another everybody else wanted(but I didn't) and another I saw resolved!
Offline
SH: agree! I think most of us here is the A type.
Offline
besleybean wrote:
But one of them I knew was gonna happen in the series, another I have predicted, another everybody else wanted(but I didn't) and another I saw resolved!
I am so intrigued by those...but I don't want to ask!
OK, how many of those 4 are ones that I already know? ie. the ones we discussed on Twitter.
Offline
You're just trying to trick me into another guilt trip, aren't you dear?!
I can't remember what we discussed!
But:
Well everybody has said what they want for the Reunion, which apparently we are getting.
I've always maintained what would havppen about John's status and the real life person who would be the catalyst.
There was one surprise spoiler...but when I saw the filming, it wasn't there!
All the things I have listed above are fairly well documented. Infact my Sherlock pal says she ONLY reads official reports and informs me the Radio Times have stated something as fact...whereas I have only seen it 'suggested'!
Incidentally, my biggesr disappointment over all is NO Paul.
Offline
This from Sherlockology today:
Filming has finished on the Empty Hearse.
Offline
Yep. Arwel posted a pic of a roadsign back to Wales!
I've just seen a huge spioler pic, which I'm very happy about...well, kind of.
Offline
besleybean wrote:
Yep. Arwel posted a pic of a roadsign back to Wales!
I've just seen a huge spioler pic, which I'm very happy about...well, kind of.
...you've got my mail adress...
Pleeeaaase tell me in private, please, please, please! (Does that sound needy? That's because I am!)
Offline
Sounds a bit.....mmmh... curious?
Offline
Oh and Michael Price tweeted about a read through today...so cracking straight on with the next episode?
Offline
Don't know if this has been posted already. Think I saw it here somewhere. Anyway, I love it.
Tweet from Steve Lawes, 10th of April:
Offline
Interesting thought:
Kristina @kristinauok 14m
everytime i see a spoilery #setlock post, i hear moffat and gatiss laugh in the distance
(Twitter)
Good night!
Offline
Mattlocked wrote:
Interesting thought:
Kristina @kristinauok 14m
everytime i see a spoilery #setlock post, i hear moffat and gatiss laugh in the distance
(Twitter)
Good night!
Ha, totally. I think there'll still be a few surprises in store even for the people who've been following all the setlock stuff.
Offline
Mattlocked wrote:
everytime i see a spoilery #setlock post, i hear moffat and gatiss laugh in the distance
You just made my (rainy) day! Thanks
Offline
See people have seen things and then rumours have started,
But I have seen pix which refute some of the suggestions.
What I will say is this: just because certain individuals were seen on set, does not mean they are actually taking part in the series...tho some may have been used as advisers.
Last edited by besleybean (April 16, 2013 5:39 am)
Offline
Michele wrote:
Good Luck!
I feel a bit like this at the moment.
That's it, exactly. I'm sort of skimming posts to see if I really want to read them, just in case there are spoilers...
Offline
omg I have just accidently been spoilered (its ok, I'm not THAT bothered either way)
All I am going to say is that if the spoliers are correct I will be extremely disapointed because, sorry, but that is not clever.
Hope its ok to say this much.
Last edited by beekeeper (April 16, 2013 11:21 am)
Offline
You! :-)