Offline
Oh, those lucky slips of paper.
Offline
All shouting: Pick Me!
Offline
besleybean wrote:
All shouting: Pick Me!
Offline
Found on the web....
Mr. Cumberbatch
On behalf of all the glorious curls you masterfully sport on your head, we kindly ask you to keep your hands off and let us errant curls do our job.
Sincerely
The Wrongfully Tamed Errant Curls Syndicate
Offline
Oh, I love these. Can I please join the WTECS?
Offline
WTECS sounds much better than Cumberbitches
Well, everything sounds better than Cumberbitches!
Last edited by tiharoa (December 9, 2012 9:09 pm)
Offline
tobeornot221b wrote:
"First, there’s the smoky baritone voice (goddamn that voice). Then there’s his electric presence, a charisma so intense that, combined with his exotic looks, causes him to practically burn off the screen. If his presence alone doesn’t make you a believer, then his interviews reveal a man who is quick-witted, intuitive, charmingly candid (and sometimes awkward), intelligent, and hilarious. He’s sensitive in all the right ways (defends feminism, cares deeply about children in Africa) and manly in all the right ways (skydives, rides a motorcycle). What thinking girl could possibly stand a chance in the presence of such a man?"
I quite agree.
I quite agree as well.
I love that article Harriet, thank you so much for sharing it with us. I love that the writer went into deeper issues surrounding the differences between men and women. Usually they're just overlooked, diminished or reduced to just calling us Cumberbitches. I won't get on my feminist soapbox, but it all goes so much deeper than that. It's hard to explain to my friends who often just see the conventional beauty of someone like Brad Pitt, the way they've been taught. But, we all know better.
Offline
Thinking Benedict-appreciating women of all lands unite!
Offline
harleyq wrote:
I love that article Harriet, thank you so much for sharing it with us. I love that the writer went into deeper issues surrounding the differences between men and women. Usually they're just overlooked, diminished or reduced to just calling us Cumberbitches. I won't get on my feminist soapbox, but it all goes so much deeper than that. It's hard to explain to my friends who often just see the conventional beauty of someone like Brad Pitt, the way they've been taught. But, we all know better.
I don't mind you stepping on your feminist soapbox, in fact, I like this to happen
SusiGo wrote:
Thinking Benedict-appreciating women of all lands unite!
YAY! I'm with you!
Last edited by Harriet (December 9, 2012 10:26 pm)
Offline
harleyq wrote:
tobeornot221b wrote:
"First, there’s the smoky baritone voice (goddamn that voice). Then there’s his electric presence, a charisma so intense that, combined with his exotic looks, causes him to practically burn off the screen. If his presence alone doesn’t make you a believer, then his interviews reveal a man who is quick-witted, intuitive, charmingly candid (and sometimes awkward), intelligent, and hilarious. He’s sensitive in all the right ways (defends feminism, cares deeply about children in Africa) and manly in all the right ways (skydives, rides a motorcycle). What thinking girl could possibly stand a chance in the presence of such a man?"
I quite agree.I quite agree as well.
I love that article Harriet, thank you so much for sharing it with us. I love that the writer went into deeper issues surrounding the differences between men and women. Usually they're just overlooked, diminished or reduced to just calling us Cumberbitches. I won't get on my feminist soapbox, but it all goes so much deeper than that. It's hard to explain to my friends who often just see the conventional beauty of someone like Brad Pitt, the way they've been taught. But, we all know better.
I don't see any beauty in Pitt, Clooney and many others like them.....not to mention that most of them don't have anything to say I would be even remotely interested in.
Offline
SusiGo wrote:
Thinking Benedict-appreciating women of all lands unite!
Hmmm....considering a membership as well.
Offline
tiharoa wrote:
harleyq wrote:
tobeornot221b wrote:
"First, there’s the smoky baritone voice (goddamn that voice). Then there’s his electric presence, a charisma so intense that, combined with his exotic looks, causes him to practically burn off the screen. If his presence alone doesn’t make you a believer, then his interviews reveal a man who is quick-witted, intuitive, charmingly candid (and sometimes awkward), intelligent, and hilarious. He’s sensitive in all the right ways (defends feminism, cares deeply about children in Africa) and manly in all the right ways (skydives, rides a motorcycle). What thinking girl could possibly stand a chance in the presence of such a man?"
I quite agree.I quite agree as well.
I love that article Harriet, thank you so much for sharing it with us. I love that the writer went into deeper issues surrounding the differences between men and women. Usually they're just overlooked, diminished or reduced to just calling us Cumberbitches. I won't get on my feminist soapbox, but it all goes so much deeper than that. It's hard to explain to my friends who often just see the conventional beauty of someone like Brad Pitt, the way they've been taught. But, we all know better.I don't see any beauty in Pitt, Clooney and many others like them.....not to mention that most of them don't have anything to say I would be even remotely interested in.
Reminds me of many people, looking at my wallpaper at work in a strange way. Like: "Oh. Hm. "
They are simply not intelligent enough. They would "understand" a George Clooney at once. Obvious.
Offline
tiharoa wrote:
I don't see any beauty in Pitt, Clooney and many others like them.....not to mention that most of them don't have anything to say I would be even remotely interested in.
To save a little bit of Brad Pitt, he seems to be a committed, generous and also thinking person.
Heck, but I would't recognise him if I saw him
Offline
Goodnight, ladies. See you.
Offline
Springs to the defence of George Clooney as well, who has been involved for many, many years in charitable works, is politically active and has also represented the UN. He is not 'pretty vacant'.
Last edited by Davina (December 9, 2012 10:53 pm)
Offline
Davina wrote:
Springs to the defence of George Clooney as well, who has been involved for many, many years in charitable works, is politically active and has also represented the UN. He is not 'pretty vacant'.
Oh I must agree with you there; also Brad Pitt does some pretty good stuff off-screen. His work with ONE campaign alone sets him way above many others.
I am always amused that people who believe they are such 'modern thinkers' by negating the worth of those with traditional good looks will very quickly place in them 'vacant' basket with no reasons to back it up.
On the other hand, Benedict has yet to show (rather than talk) about his 'worth' in other fields away from the cameras.
Offline
kazza474 wrote:
I am always amused that people who believe they are such 'modern thinkers' by negating the worth of those with traditional good looks will very quickly place in them 'vacant' basket with no reasons to back it up.
Thanks for warning us of such modern thinkers - I will look out if I find some
Offline
tobeornot221b wrote:
SusiGo wrote:
Thinking Benedict-appreciating women of all lands unite!
Hmmm....considering a membership as well.
Count me in!
Offline
Harriet wrote:
Thanks for warning us of such modern thinkers - I will look out if I find some
Oh it wasn't a warning, merely an observation.
Offline
Picture time!