Offline
She's converted. A miracle.
Offline
Mattlocked wrote:
OMG. I think this one converted me into a Johnlocker right now....
Heh Better late to the party than never showing up at all. *g* Once your eyes are open to the possibility, you'll never watch the episodes in the same way again. The actors have chemistry, real chemistry, and although most of the time I think they're just making a joke of it all, there's also a definite undercurrent of chemistry between their characters. As there was in the original canon, I understand.
Offline
tobeornot221b wrote:
...which brings me to this wonderful moment:
And, oh lord, there are so very many.....
Offline
ancientsgate wrote:
Mattlocked wrote:
OMG. I think this one converted me into a Johnlocker right now....
Heh Better late to the party than never showing up at all. *g* Once your eyes are open to the possibility, you'll never watch the episodes in the same way again. The actors have chemistry, real chemistry, and although most of the time I think they're just making a joke of it all, there's also a definite undercurrent of chemistry between their characters. As there was in the original canon, I understand.
I - still - don't know the canon.
Offline
Sorry, you won't find these looks in the canon. At least they aren't mentioned. But your imagination is free like a bird.
Offline
SusiGo wrote:
Sorry, you won't find these looks in the canon. At least they aren't mentioned. But your imagination is free like a bird.
Oh, sorry. Not nice of me.
Offline
Susi and I discovered the canon truth recently
Last edited by Harriet (November 7, 2012 8:34 pm)
Offline
What do you mean? I've got so much Sherlock in my head, I must have deleted something. Or do you mean the copy thing?
Offline
No, we found out that ACD's wife was the one who wrote the stories (like so many women in those days who gave their talents to their husbands/lovers) and how he later deleted all the Johnlock.
Last edited by Harriet (November 7, 2012 8:28 pm)
Offline
OH, I almost forgot: I know some guys who really know about the canon!!
Offline
Harriet: Ah, the woman-in-the-background theory, I remember. Yes, my favourite theory.
Mattlocked: Don't we?
Offline
SusiGo wrote:
Sorry, you won't find these looks in the canon. At least they aren't mentioned. But your imagination is free like a bird.
No, not the looks, of course. Just the pipes and mustaches would be enough to put anyone off, lolololol. But the friendship, the (what we call today) bromance is all over those pages. And yes, our imaginations is where it's at. mmm, mmm, good....
Offline
Harriet wrote:
According to the canon, they are deep in their closets, believe me
As most everyone was back in their era.
And Susi and I discovered the canon truth recently
Do tell. *am all ears*
Offline
Harriet wrote:
No, we found out that ACD's wife was the one who wrote the stories (like so many women in those days who gave their talents to their husbands/lovers) and how he later deleted all the Johnlock.
What?
Offline
The talented woman behind ACD who did the writing, and then he became famous for her stories.
In her original, all the Johnlock was included - only ACD removed it
Last edited by Harriet (November 7, 2012 8:42 pm)
Offline
Yep, earlier this year.
Offline
ancientsgate wrote:
Harriet wrote:
According to the canon, they are deep in their closets, believe me
As most everyone was back in their era.
I deleted it in my original post, as I feel it was a bit too much perhaps.
However, I agree, silence was the rule in public. Therefore maybe the canon relationship would have looked differently under other circumstances.
Offline
Jeeps, thought I'd wandered into a parallel universe...
Offline
Offline
Oh. yes. And another good morning pic: