BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



October 15, 2016 1:14 pm  #4661


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

besleybean wrote:

I think if she'd meant to kill him, she'd have a put a bullet through his brain.

Yes, exactly, and she's counting on his realizing that, and at least being curious enough to keep quiet til he can hear her out.  She's not sure about this, which is why she starts their encounter with, "What do you want, Sherlock?" and brings her gun, ready to shoot him again if necessary.  This is where I see Mary at her coldest and most dangerous, and she's scary.  She's also on the edge of despair, and I don't quite believe her.  While she says to Sherlock, "Please.  Understand.  There is nothing in this world I would not do to stop that happening," clearly there is, because she didn't kill him in the first place, which would have been by far the easiest way to keep her secret.

 

October 15, 2016 1:18 pm  #4662


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Sorry.  I'll shut up now.  You have all been talking about this for years, and I'm new, so I'm sure I am rehashing old ground.  Still can't wait for Season Four.

 

October 15, 2016 1:20 pm  #4663


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Same here. Let it come! We have been stuck in this hell for nearly three years. 


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 

October 15, 2016 1:20 pm  #4664


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

It's difficult enough when you wander late into a thread, never mind when you join the fandom in the middle(maybe) of a show's run!
Who has the time to read the multiple pages? Anyway, points often do get lost or forgotten.
So don't worry about it, post away!

Actually Susi, it's only really a year...the special was a full episode in its own right and I think it moved things on.

Last edited by besleybean (October 15, 2016 1:22 pm)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

October 15, 2016 1:24 pm  #4665


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Yeah, sorry, I didn't wade through all 241 pages before jumping in.  That's probably enough, though.  
 

 

October 15, 2016 1:27 pm  #4666


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

besleybean wrote:

It's difficult enough when you wander late into a thread, never mind when you join the fandom in the middle(maybe) of a show's run!
Who has the time to read the multiple pages? Anyway, points often do get lost or forgotten.
So don't worry about it, post away!

Actually Susi, it's only really a year...the special was a full episode in its own right and I think it moved things on.

Well, yes and no. We did not really move on, did we? Or just about five minutes with nothing really solved and many new questions. 

Last edited by SusiGo (October 15, 2016 1:28 pm)


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 

October 15, 2016 1:31 pm  #4667


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

But as you say, new possibilities!


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

October 16, 2016 2:02 am  #4668


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

besleybean wrote:

Thank you so much for this last post, I agree....well, except I don't think Mary will stay around.

Neither do I, since it's not canon.  And neither will the baby, for the same reason.
 

 

October 16, 2016 2:03 am  #4669


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

besleybean wrote:

I think if she'd meant to kill him, she'd have a put a bullet through his brain.

Or his heart.

 

 

October 16, 2016 2:05 am  #4670


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

SusiGo wrote:

Indeed. We are starved for new developments. 

No kidding!

 

 

October 16, 2016 8:22 am  #4671


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

kgreen20 wrote:

besleybean wrote:

I think if she'd meant to kill him, she'd have a put a bullet through his brain.

Or his heart.

 

Just one thought. Imagine the writers WANTED her to kill him but have him survive. (Just imagine if you don't believe in it.)

How could they have shown it? A bullet through the head or rhe heart would have been impossible because Sherlock could not survive.

So how else would it have been possible?

Last edited by Schmiezi (October 16, 2016 8:24 am)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I still believe that love conquers all!

     

"Quick, man, if you love me."
 

October 16, 2016 8:52 am  #4672


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I think that if they'd missed out Sherlock's deduction it would have worked, but also if Sherlock had shot Magnussen in the chest instead of the head.  

 

October 16, 2016 8:06 pm  #4673


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

In which case,they would have had to portray her as a lousy shot, since from only a short distance from Sherlock, she tried to aim for a shot that would kill him and failed.  But they didn't; they portrayed her as an excellent shot, as her subsequent demonstration with the coin showed.  Therefore, there is no way that she was aiming for a shot that would have ended his life.  She would have most certainly have succeeded at it had she tried.
 

Last edited by kgreen20 (October 16, 2016 8:08 pm)

 

October 16, 2016 8:07 pm  #4674


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

This is how it seems to me.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

October 16, 2016 8:18 pm  #4675


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

kgreen20 wrote:

In which case,they would have had to portray her as a lousy shot, since from only a short distance from Sherlock, she tried to aim for a shot that would kill him and failed.  But they didn't; they portrayed her as an excellent shot, as her subsequent demonstration with the coin showed.  Therefore, there is no way that she was aiming for a shot that would have ended his life.  She would have most certainly have succeeded at it had she tried.
 

I have questions: Why did she shoot him at all? She could have knocked him out with the gun. Worked for Magnussen, would have worked for Sherlock. If she was such a good shot, she would have known how dangerous a place it was to shoot him. Again, why did she shoot at all? She was clearly neither nervous nor in panic. 
 


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 

October 16, 2016 8:24 pm  #4676


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Well, if we didn't have Sherlock's deduction we wouldn't know she was a good shot (or that she was an assassin). 

Anyway, the coin is hit slightly off-centre, and actually either way, whether Mary intended to kill or not, she's slightly off the mark.   She didn't manage to kill him (if she was trying to), and yet it was very unlikely that he would have survived that shot (if she wanted him to).  I understand that this was for dramatic effect, that we (and Sherlock) are supposed to think she was trying to kill him until the reveal of Sherlock's deduction.   This wouldn't have been quite so effective if we'd seen him less gravely wounded (and it wouldn't have had the same emotional impact). 

 

October 16, 2016 11:18 pm  #4677


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Lately I feel that I don't care why she shot Sherlock.  No matter why, she did shoot him and his heart did stop.
I will never get over that.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proud President and Founder of the OSAJ.  
Honorary German  
"Anyone who takes himself too seriously always runs the risk of looking ridiculous; anyone who can consistently laugh at himself does not".
 -Vaclav Havel 
"Life is full of wonder, Love is never wrong."   Melissa Ethridge

I ship it harder than Mrs. Hudson.
    
 
 

October 17, 2016 3:45 am  #4678


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

tonnaree wrote:

Lately I feel that I don't care why she shot Sherlock.  No matter why, she did shoot him and his heart did stop.
I will never get over that.

Right there with you. 

 

October 17, 2016 4:40 am  #4679


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

tonnaree wrote:

Lately I feel that I don't care why she shot Sherlock.  No matter why, she did shoot him and his heart did stop.
I will never get over that.

Yes, thank you, tonnaree. This. And tbh, how she was shown in TAB I also don't feel represented by her character in a positive way. As a woman.
 


------------------------------------------------------------

Eventually everyone will support Johnlock.


"If you're not reading the subtext then hell mend you"  -  Steven Moffat
"Love conquers all" Benedict Cumberbatch on Sherlock's and John's relationship
"This is a show about a detective, his best friend, his wife, their baby and their dog" - Nobody. Ever.

 

October 17, 2016 5:33 am  #4680


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Well that's the way the team chose to go and I can live with it.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum