BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



August 26, 2016 5:11 pm  #6841


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Liberty wrote:

GimmeCat wrote:

I'd like to hear people's platonic interpretations of this part of the script of HLV:

MAGNUSSEN: Very hard to find a pressure point on you, Mr Holmes.
SHERLOCK: Mm. (John turns and walks towards the wall.)
MAGNUSSEN: The drugs thing I never believed for a moment. (John continues walking closer to the wall, staring at the footage with his mouth open.)
MAGNUSSEN: Anyway, you wouldn’t care if it was exposed, would you?
(Sherlock tilts his head, quirks his mouth and shrugs.)
MAGNUSSEN (looking at the screen): But look how you care about John Watson.

Why would Sherlock care if it was "exposed" how much he cares about John? Moriarty already knows John is the 'heart' to burn out of him, and by extension, that means most of the criminal underworld knows. So I find it difficult to read this as Sherlock worrying strictly about a matter of John's safety, because that ship has already sailed (so to speak). What's left to expose, then?

Magnussen doesn't say anything about Sherlock's relationship with John being exposed.    It's the drugs he's talking about there - he's suggesting that Sherlock would not be bothered if Magnussen printed a story about him using drugs, so he couldn't have used that as blackmail.  (Even though Sherlock had supposedly tried to push that as a pressure point to trick Magnussen - that was the point of being "on a case" at the beginning). 

Now with John, Magnussen isn't talking about exposing anything.  That's clear from him putting John in the bonfire - he wasn't thinking about threatening to print something but about endangering John's life.  Except he doesn't need to, because he has Mary, the next person in the chain, and can threaten to kill her instead. 

Now we know Sherlock is happy for people to know how much he cares for John.  He chooses to announce his love publicly, at the wedding.   We also know that he's not at all bothered about possible misinterpretations of their relationship - he doesn't bother to correct people who suspect they are a couple, he's not bothered by "bachelor John Watson" in the press and so on.   (In fact, at that time, he willingly allows all sorts of bad stuff to be printed about him, to help the case).    So I don't see how Magnussen could ever have blackmailed Sherlock by threatening to print a Johnlock story.  Sherlock would just have ignored it. 

But anyway, that's not what he's saying - it's the drugs he's talking about exposing, the "fake" pressure point.  Then he's talking about exploiting the fact that Sherlock cares for John - that that's his real pressure point.
 

But he knows that Junkie!Sherlock is only a cover, and he states very clearly that he didn't believe it. Magnussen was going to print a story even he wasn't buying?

 

August 26, 2016 5:12 pm  #6842


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Well, I still don't know which parts of TAB are real.

And yes to the interpretation of CAM talking about Sherlock's drug use. I thought it was clear.

 

August 26, 2016 5:19 pm  #6843


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

besleybean wrote:

Well Sherlock murders CAM because he thinks Mary is John's pressure point.
Does he get that wrong too?

That would be Sherlock getting John's pressure point wrong, possibly because he believes CAM. And CAM might have got that wrong, partly because John appeared to have chosen Mary-- before he was put into the bonfire. There's your test of pressure points right there, and Sherlock proved it. But who did John go home to? Who did he marry? 
 

 

August 26, 2016 5:20 pm  #6844


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

RavenMorganLeigh wrote:

[
But he knows that Junkie!Sherlock is only a cover, and he states very clearly that he didn't believe it. Magnussen was going to print a story even he wasn't buying?

No, he wasn't. He wasn't going to print about the drug use because a) he didn't believe it and b) Sherlock wouldn't have cared if it was exposed anyway.


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"We'll live on starlight and crime scenes" - wordstrings


Team Hudders!
 
 

August 26, 2016 5:20 pm  #6845


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

@ Raven Yes, Mary.

Last edited by besleybean (August 26, 2016 5:22 pm)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

August 26, 2016 5:25 pm  #6846


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

besleybean wrote:

@ Raven Yes, Mary.

My point is, Sherlock has been wrong before. He assumed that Mary was the most important person to John-- when in fact -- it might actually have been Sherlock himself. 

 

August 26, 2016 5:31 pm  #6847


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

RavenMorganLeigh wrote:

besleybean wrote:

@ Raven Yes, Mary.

My point is, Sherlock has been wrong before. He assumed that Mary was the most important person to John-- when in fact -- it might actually have been Sherlock himself. 

Just think if his reaction when John asked him to be his best man. Sherlock completely missed that he was John's best friend. It is not that ooc that he got the pressure point wrong as well.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I still believe that love conquers all!

     

"Quick, man, if you love me."
 

August 26, 2016 5:34 pm  #6848


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Schmiezi wrote:

RavenMorganLeigh wrote:

besleybean wrote:

@ Raven Yes, Mary.

My point is, Sherlock has been wrong before. He assumed that Mary was the most important person to John-- when in fact -- it might actually have been Sherlock himself. 

Just think if his reaction when John asked him to be his best man. Sherlock completely missed that he was John's best friend. It is not that ooc that he got the pressure point wrong as well.

Yes, exactly!!
 

 

August 26, 2016 5:36 pm  #6849


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

besleybean wrote:

(Sigh).
Again: nobody has ever said Sherlock doesn't care about John.
He loves him more than anybody on this planet.
But he's not in love with him, he doesn't want a relationship with him.
It IS a bromance.
The best friendship in fiction.
I like fun too, but for me it doesn't have to involve glitter.
Incidentally I seem to have missed the name calling: what names were people called?
 

Some people believe differently.  That's why this debate thread exists.  So that we can debate our thoughts and opinions.

Nothing HAS to involve glitter, but it often makes things more fun. 
 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proud President and Founder of the OSAJ.  
Honorary German  
"Anyone who takes himself too seriously always runs the risk of looking ridiculous; anyone who can consistently laugh at himself does not".
 -Vaclav Havel 
"Life is full of wonder, Love is never wrong."   Melissa Ethridge

I ship it harder than Mrs. Hudson.
    
 
 

August 26, 2016 5:39 pm  #6850


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I agree, tonnaree. Anyone who thinks the question has been settled for good does not have to post here. If anyone does not like the discussion, they are free not to post here. But we should respect anyone who wishes to discuss this further. 


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 

August 26, 2016 5:41 pm  #6851


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I hope we all do.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

August 26, 2016 5:42 pm  #6852


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

RavenMorganLeigh wrote:

The other thing-- Magnussen doesn't believe Sherlock's drugs ruse-- though everyone else believes Sherlock's a junkie! Is this a mistake in the writing-- because it becomes a major issue in TAB-- or is Magnussen correct? Or,  does this actually mean that he's wrong--fallible? If he's fallible, could he have given John the wrong pressure point-- Mary, when it should have been Sherlock?  Hmmmm.....

Well, I was surprised that Sherlock wasn't John's pressure point. I understand that it would be Mary, but I don't see why it wouldn't be Sherlock as well. 


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"We'll live on starlight and crime scenes" - wordstrings


Team Hudders!
 
 

August 26, 2016 5:53 pm  #6853


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I'm sure Sherlock would be a pressure point for John, but that's irrelevant for Magnussen because it would just lead him in a circle.  It's Mycroft he's trying to get at, so no point in threatening Sherlock to get at John. 

Drugs do seem to be a bit of a pressure point in TAB.   But before that, they're not a huge problem.   He uses them for Magnussen case, but shrugs them off pretty quickly.  And how would Magnussen use them, except by threatening printing a story about Sherlock being a user?  Hardly a huge scandal.   I'm surprised Sherlock expects him to fall for it at all - either he underestimates him, or he just wants to lure him in (he does find out what he think is information about the letters because Magnussen visits after the drugs are revealed), or he's actually setting that up as a pressure point to convince John, when in fact he knows Magnussen will do something much more personal and dangerous.  (He does hear him whisper Redbeard, after all).
 

 

August 26, 2016 6:19 pm  #6854


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Vhanja wrote:

RavenMorganLeigh wrote:

[
But he knows that Junkie!Sherlock is only a cover, and he states very clearly that he didn't believe it. Magnussen was going to print a story even he wasn't buying?

No, he wasn't. He wasn't going to print about the drug use because a) he didn't believe it and b) Sherlock wouldn't have cared if it was exposed anyway.

Exactly.  To be honest, I don't really understand how people can read it as Sherlock being worried about his relationship with John being exposed.   It doesn't follow from what Magnussen says, does it?  (Or what he does).
 

 

August 26, 2016 6:22 pm  #6855


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Yeah, the way Magnussen's lines are worded, it's clear to me that the exposed line has to do with the drug use.


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"We'll live on starlight and crime scenes" - wordstrings


Team Hudders!
 
 

August 26, 2016 9:21 pm  #6856


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

There's no reason for that line to exist unless it's being directly conflated with the next line. There's a comparison being made.

Remove the 'exposed' line and you get this:

MAGNUSSEN: Very hard to find a pressure point on you, Mr Holmes.
SHERLOCK: Mm. (John turns and walks towards the wall.)
MAGNUSSEN: The drugs thing I never believed for a moment. (John continues walking closer to the wall, staring at the footage with his mouth open.)
MAGNUSSEN (looking at the screen): But look how you care about John Watson.


That's no different than what a few of you are saying, is it not? The script and dialog would be tighter, more precise this way. But they purposefully add a line to distinguish what is actually being compared: not the pressure points themselves (as above would be), but the effect of their exposure.

MAGNUSSEN: [b]Anyway, you wouldn’t care if it was exposed, would you?
(Sherlock tilts his head, quirks his mouth and shrugs.)
MAGNUSSEN (looking at the screen): But look how you care about John Watson.[/b]

Last edited by GimmeCat (August 26, 2016 9:21 pm)


Doomsteady on AO3 & Tumblr
 

August 26, 2016 9:21 pm  #6857


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Vhanja wrote:

Yeah, the way Magnussen's lines are worded, it's clear to me that the exposed line has to do with the drug use.

 
How so, when Magnussen explicitly said that he knew Sherlock was faking it? (The hapless, addicted junkie undercover role Sherlock was playing)

 

August 26, 2016 9:27 pm  #6858


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

GimmeCat, I agree. The bonfire was a test to see how Sherlock would act if John was in danger. And this was before the drugs. Magnussen must have known that Sherlock's pressure point were never the drugs. But Sherlock did not know this and therefore tried the drug approach with Magnussen. 

We have been shown over and over again that John is his soft spot where he can be must effectively attacked: the pool, ASiB in Irene's house, on the roof, the bonfire, the HLV mind palace, Appledore. 


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 

August 26, 2016 9:30 pm  #6859


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I have honestly never seen anyone arguing against this. 
Yes indeed since the Pool, John has always been Sherlock's weakness.
For me it's only ever been the nature of that love that has been up for debate.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

August 26, 2016 9:33 pm  #6860


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Liberty wrote:

Now we know Sherlock is happy for people to know how much he cares for John.  He chooses to announce his love publicly, at the wedding.   We also know that he's not at all bothered about possible misinterpretations of their relationship - he doesn't bother to correct people who suspect they are a couple, he's not bothered by "bachelor John Watson" in the press and so on.   (In fact, at that time, he willingly allows all sorts of bad stuff to be printed about him, to help the case).    So I don't see how Magnussen could ever have blackmailed Sherlock by threatening to print a Johnlock story.  Sherlock would just have ignored it. 
 

Sherlock couldn´t care less what people think about him. But he knows John "I_am_not_gay" cares about appearances to an almost ridiculous level. So if people insinuate something about John, he tends to get protective of him. We could see it in TRF, in a scene with Kitty Riley, another person who tried to blackmail Sherlock. Sherlock was apathetic to her threats to the moments when she said: "You and John Watson, just platonic?" The moment she said that, Sherlock viciously verbally attacked her and hissed: "You repel me." He wouldn´t do that if she did not try to involve John in her harmful writing.

So in my opinion - of course Sherlock would care if CAM printed Johnlock story. Because it would involve John too and it could harm John´s reputation in the long run. 

Last edited by nakahara (August 26, 2016 9:38 pm)


-----------------------------------

I cannot live without brainwork. What else is there to live for? Stand at the window there. Was there ever such a dreary, dismal, unprofitable world? See how the yellow fog swirls down the street and drifts across the dun-coloured houses. What could be more hopelessly prosaic and material? What is the use of having powers, Doctor, when one has no field upon which to exert them?

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum