Offline
From Arianne de Vere:
MARK: He just can’t believe it! But he is actually pleased for him.
STEVEN: Remember the very first cut? It made him look as if he was jealous.
MARK: Which was not a good idea.
STEVEN: [We were] saying, ‘No, no, no, he’s thrilled, but a little bit “What?! Out of nowhere, you’ve got the really hot girl from the wedding!”’
I took it to mean that he wasn't supposed to look jealous at all!
Offline
Ah, yes, Steven's last comment is probably why I interpreted the "very first cut" to be John being jealous of Janine.
Offline
Well as a non-Johnlocker, I decided to not even address the possibility of John being jealous of Janine...for me he is obviously in love with Mary.
Point remains they didn't want John to appear jealous, but rather thrilled that Sherlock managed to get the hot girl from the wedding!
Incidentally, why do people think Mark didn't think it was a good idea for John to appear jealous? And in fact why did they rather want him to be pleased for Sherlock?
Last edited by besleybean (February 16, 2016 9:38 pm)
Offline
In my opinion if they wanted John to look pleased Martin failed spectacularly.
Offline
Yeah, I agree, he looks grudgingly pleased at most, but comes across more disbelieving. He continues to question Sherlock about it to find out if it's true. If he were really pleased about it, he wouldn't question it, he'd say "that's great Sherlock, I'm happy for you".
Last edited by ukaunz (February 16, 2016 11:06 pm)
Offline
tonnaree wrote:
In my opinion if they wanted John to look pleased Martin failed spectacularly.
Yes, thank you, tonnaree. I fully agree with this. I see no happiness at all in this. And it doesn't matter if I want to see it for the sake of friendship or not, for me it's simply not there.
Offline
Oh I completely agree and have always said so...I do not see anything other than total surprise: he's never known Sherlock be in a relationship, Sherlock himself has said he doesn't do relationships...it's just one of those things the team and I have to disagree on.
But as ever, this is not the point: the point is, Mark and Steven did not want John to be jealous. As nobody is offering any other explanation, I state that's because there is nothing for him to be jealous about and why would he be?
They seem to think it would be perfectly normal for John to be happy that his friend is in a relationship, too....with a woman, like him.
Offline
"Gobsmacked" is the word that always springs to mind to describe his expression - that's the overwhelming impression that I get! I do see a little bit of a smile which looks like a smile of amazement (like he's thinking "Really?"), but I suppose it helps to show that it's positive rather than negative, pleased rather than disapproving. (The scene reminds me a little of John meeting Sherlock's parents and being similarly surprised, but not in a negative way). This sprung to mind for me as a more negative expression in response to a highly surprising event:
I do believe the writers, but another thing that really fits with is the scene in the greenhouse in TAB - John is concerned about Sherlock being "alone" (or at least, Sherlock thinks he's concerned!). But the main thing is that it's Sherlock, dating like a "normal person". That's what John keeps coming back to through the scene, completely ignoring the case!
As for why he might be jealous, I think Vhanja's explanation makes sense and fits with Steven's comment. I think I'd call it envy rather than jealousy in that case. But yes, we know that he's not jealous there. And why they didn't want to show him as jealous - well, I think it's not very flattering to John's character whatever the reason for jealousy. And because John should be pleased for Sherlock, because a good friend would be.
Offline
Well, but this Martin "I can do that with a look" Freeman. BAFTA winner. And yet people find at least three different interpretations in the way he plays this scene. Jealousy, envy, baffled surprise. Since I believe that he is fully able to play this in a way that leaves no doubt to his reaction, there must be intentional ambiguity.
If, however, we look at the "looking for baby names" scene in ASiB which is a mirror of the Janine scene - Sherlock with a woman and John not happy about it - John quite obviously is not amused.
What remains is the fact that the two times Sherlock seriously seems to be interested in or flirted at by a woman, John does not show the reaction one might expect from a best buddy. Which is the one he jokingly shows in TSoT: "Glad you pulled, mate!"
Offline
There's also this slightly different interpretation of John's reaction to Janine
Offline
I always interpreted that scene with Janine as stunned and slightly amused disbelief. Probably the same reaction as a lot of the audience (and Martin has said himself that John often plays the role of the audience in the show).
I think that the interpretation in your link is also valid, ukaunz. (And I don't think it rules out the stunned disbelief either). To me, it would make a lot of sense that John would be jealous of Janine in the same way Sherlock would be jealous of Sholto/Mary - someone who plays a very important role in the life of the other, and who might therefore be a "threat" to their relationship. I think that is quite common amongst close friends, even though it might be a bit shameful to admit.
Also, I don't think the skill of the actor necessarily is what will limited the amount of different interpretations there are. Fans always have different views and see the show through different eyes. There will always be different interpretations, I think, no matter how the actors act or what the cast and crew says in interviews about how they think it is.
Offline
Vhanja wrote:
Also, I don't think the skill of the actor necessarily is what will limited the amount of different interpretations there are. Fans always have different views and see the show through different eyes. There will always be different interpretations, I think, no matter how the actors act or what the cast and crew says in interviews about how they think it is.
Very good observation. I agree.
Offline
I agree, too.
For me this can be both a blessing and a curse.
Offline
I agree with all of that, Vhanja. The interpretation in Ukaunz's link - I came to a similar conclusion after reading the meta which claimed that there was jealousy there. I absolutely think that jealousy happens in friendships (and I think we see it very clearly in the scene with Sherlock and Sholto), and believe it could be possible for John to be jealous in that situation. However, I didn't see it before reading the meta. And I think it would show John in a less positive light - he was the one who moved out, he has just got married, been on honeymoon and not contacted Sherlock until he came across him by accident. It would be churlish of him to begrudge Sherlock a girlfriend, and some human company, especially as he is living with Mary. (Of course, it might be possible for him to be churlish - I'll get to Sherlock being rather churlish later! But I don't really see it).
I agree about the acting as well - Martin Freeman is a great actor, but we all came away with different interpretations, because I think it is difficult for us to pin things like that down - we relate them to the context. (To clarify about "envy" - I think I'm the only person that mentioned that, and I didn't see it. I just suggested it was the word I would use for what Steven Moffat was describing).
I think the comparism to the scene to Irene is a good one - clearly, there isn't the same thing going on in both, and John doesn't have that half-smile in the Irene scene. It's obvious to me why he's annoyed there, but I'm sure it's another area that we'll all see slightly differently. (John has been worried about Sherlock for a long time, and has been kept in the dark by him. They make him feel like a fool, and flirt in a rather ostentatious way while ignoring him, in his own home. I think he's entitled to be snappy here).
I think the Sholto scene is another good comparism - I think that's one scene where we all agree that there's jealousy! It's very clear. And definitely no little smiles. There is no way (I feel) to interpret that as Sherlock being pleased that John's old friend turned up (even if that's what he should be feeling as a friend).
Last edited by Liberty (February 17, 2016 7:04 pm)
Offline
I think it's complicated.
Sherlock I think is fairly indifferent to Sholto in one sense...though maybe curious as to why he and John were pals.
But yes, I maybe have to accept there is jealousy of the friendship .
Possibly it's just with Sherlock only really ever having one human friend, he doesn't understand that goldfish can have more than one!
But his logic must tell him that he means more to John than Sholto does, after all John has told him so, in making him best man.
Yes, it could be Sherlock's emotions getting in the way of reason again.
Last edited by besleybean (February 17, 2016 6:58 pm)
Offline
I would actually think that a very skilled actor would make for more interpretations than a mediocre one, because their acting would be more layered and nuanced. We are back to the "two emotions at once"-comment from Ian McKellen. Martin manages to portray shock, amusement, disbelief, bewilderment, confusion - and perhaps a tad of jealousy in one form or another - without really saying much.
Last edited by Vhanja (February 17, 2016 7:16 pm)
Offline
Just found a wonderful quote by Steven. It is about DW but surely applicable to his other work as well. I appreciate how he includes the viewers in the interpretation of his work and does not try to prescribe one single reading:
"I keep saying, Head Canon is important, because that’s where the show really happens: in the hearts and minds of all the people watching."
Offline
I'm always happy that people appreciate what the writers say about their own work and don't think they always lie!
Offline
Well when the writers flat out tell you that they do lie, it's hard not to take them at their word!
Offline
ukaunz wrote:
Well when the writers flat out tell you that they do lie, it's hard not to take them at their word!
This.
And there is a difference between talking about your work in general and telling people that you lie about the specific direction a show is going to take.