BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



November 29, 2015 8:29 am  #2521


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

That's interesting: so what scenarios are people depicting for Mary to be fully forgiven...and still with John?


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

November 29, 2015 10:57 am  #2522


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

This is beyond my imagination.


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 

November 29, 2015 11:06 am  #2523


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

That's what I presumed...but I think this may well happen.
Well at least I am assuming that at the start of S4, John and Mary will be back at home together and Sherlock will be back in Baker Street...
I would like to think by the end of S4, we have the boys back in Baker Street and Mary gone.
But then I hoped that for S3!
Also, there remains the problem of the baby.
So the best scenario for me, would be is the child is not John's.
Second best I guess that Mary and baby depart to other lands, into hiding or something.
Third scenario that John and Mary are still together, but Mary doesn't really feature in the stories.
But I don't trust the writers...in the sense that we know Steven is not averse to disposing of a child!
But then maybe ACD did that too, I don't remember...
Although ironically(and I think we've discussed this before) that may be the best way for Mary to be redeemed in the eyes of some of you...
In that she dies trying to save Sherlock(or possibly John)...

Last edited by besleybean (November 29, 2015 11:08 am)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

November 29, 2015 2:59 pm  #2524


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

The last thing I want is for Mary to die a hero.   I have stated several time before that my wish is for Mary to go full on villian in S4.  Not because I hate the character but because I think it would be the best, most exciting thing to happen to the character.  Give AA something really meaty to sink her teeth into.  And bring the boys together to take her out.

 

Last edited by tonnaree (November 29, 2015 2:59 pm)


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proud President and Founder of the OSAJ.  
Honorary German  
"Anyone who takes himself too seriously always runs the risk of looking ridiculous; anyone who can consistently laugh at himself does not".
 -Vaclav Havel 
"Life is full of wonder, Love is never wrong."   Melissa Ethridge

I ship it harder than Mrs. Hudson.
    
 
 

November 29, 2015 3:13 pm  #2525


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Take her and the baby out?
Though I do think there is room for your Mary as a villain theory.
Thing is, what keeps echoing in my mind, is Mark and Steven talking about any new villain just being an inferior Moriarty...which kind of fits in with them not keeping CAM around.
But Mary, now that would be something different.
Then again...they do like to keep things as canonical as possible.
But of course, canonical Mary wasn't an assassin!


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

November 29, 2015 3:20 pm  #2526


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

So true!

And with that said, I honestly don't see any way for the producers to keep Mary--even as a villain--and the baby without changing the essential thrust of the show.  What Arthur Conan Doyle was able to manage in his series of stories for a time would not work in a TV show.  The show's essential thrust is that of a detective story, with a close relationship between the two protagonists, Sherlock and John.  Bring in a permanent wife and child for John, and the thrust is automatically and permanently changed.  The only way to prevent that from happening is to kill off Mary and the baby, which is what ACD himself ended up doing (to our knowledge, his Mary never became a mother).  In other words, if the producers want to keep the thrust as it has been, they will have to stick to canon, which will mean making John a fatherless widower.
 

Last edited by kgreen20 (November 29, 2015 3:25 pm)

 

November 29, 2015 3:31 pm  #2527


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

That has always been my primary thought...
But then again, in canon, the pliable wife allows Watson to go off on his adventures.
Plus, ACD didn't have a baby to kill off!


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

November 29, 2015 3:43 pm  #2528


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Nope, he didn't.  With that said, since we don't know what canon Mary died of, all we can do is guess; for all we know, she could have died while giving birth to a stillborn child.  We know only that she did die, and that she did not leave a child behind.  As for BBC Mary, she exhibits no reluctance to letting John solve cases with Sherlock, I've noticed. =)

But even with her willingness to let her husband go on solving mysteries with Sherlock, her very presence and her pregnancy both threaten to change the show's thrust.  What worked in the original stories, and what some fanfiction writers manage to make work in their fanfic, cannot be made to work on a TV show.  Either Mary and the baby will have to die, or the producers will have to decide to change the show's thrust permanently.  And I don't see them choosing to do that myself.
 

Last edited by kgreen20 (November 29, 2015 3:46 pm)

 

November 29, 2015 3:52 pm  #2529


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

This really is an unpleasant subject to discuss, but yes, a still birth may be an option....though I think we have said this before: traumatised John.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

November 29, 2015 4:49 pm  #2530


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

A stillborn child and a deceased wife = double the trauma.  And if John comes close to death as Sherlock did in "His Last Vow," that will mean even more trauma for him.
 

Last edited by kgreen20 (November 29, 2015 4:51 pm)

 

November 29, 2015 4:53 pm  #2531


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I'm a bit more uncertain of how to resolve the baby issue.  But no, I don't want John and Sherlock to "take the baby out."   My ideal would be that it is a fake but not sure they could make that work.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proud President and Founder of the OSAJ.  
Honorary German  
"Anyone who takes himself too seriously always runs the risk of looking ridiculous; anyone who can consistently laugh at himself does not".
 -Vaclav Havel 
"Life is full of wonder, Love is never wrong."   Melissa Ethridge

I ship it harder than Mrs. Hudson.
    
 
 

November 29, 2015 5:01 pm  #2532


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I think John would know if his wife wasn't really pregnant!
Whether it's his, or what happens to it- I don't know!


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

November 29, 2015 5:14 pm  #2533


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

besleybean wrote:

I think John would know if his wife wasn't really pregnant!
Whether it's his, or what happens to it- I don't know!

In my opinion it is within the realm of possibility, even if just barely.  If it turns out that she and John did not live in the same house from the domestic in 221b to Christmas it could be faked.  Ultrasounds can be faked also.  John said he had seen an ultrasound.  He did not specify that he was there when it was performed.

Not saying that's what's going to happen.  Just saying it could be pulled off.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proud President and Founder of the OSAJ.  
Honorary German  
"Anyone who takes himself too seriously always runs the risk of looking ridiculous; anyone who can consistently laugh at himself does not".
 -Vaclav Havel 
"Life is full of wonder, Love is never wrong."   Melissa Ethridge

I ship it harder than Mrs. Hudson.
    
 
 

November 29, 2015 5:16 pm  #2534


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Or if it was Mary's.


Eventually everyone will support Johnlock.   Independent OSAJ Affiliate

... but there may be some new players now. It’s okay. The East Wind takes us all in the end.
 

November 29, 2015 5:18 pm  #2535


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Oh yes, I agree with those things.
We've had this discussion before...how much time had passed between the Xmas day reconciliation and the tarmac...?


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

November 29, 2015 5:52 pm  #2536


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Harriet wrote:

Or if it was Mary's.

I know we have a thread of its own for this so just my two cents:

A fake pregnancy seems unrealistic to me. However, a child who is not John's is a definite possibility. For a very minor character David is very present, he is even sitting at the same table with Molly, Lestrade, and Mrs Hudson and is visible in many shots of the wedding scene. Apart from the fact that he bears a resemblance to John and even dresses similarly. 


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 

November 29, 2015 6:00 pm  #2537


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I meant the ultrasound pic.
But, yes, David is not all away, I'd guess.


Eventually everyone will support Johnlock.   Independent OSAJ Affiliate

... but there may be some new players now. It’s okay. The East Wind takes us all in the end.
 

November 29, 2015 6:10 pm  #2538


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Pregnancies have been faked in real life, and I'm sure it could be done in fiction.  I don't know what the purpose would be, but I don't think there would be any coming back for Mary after that. 

Infidelity seems a bit too soap opera of a crime for me, after shooting Sherlock, being an assassin, lying about her whole background, etc.   I'll be really disappointed if that's the plan.  In fact, I think I'd rather have the fake pregnancy! 

 

November 29, 2015 6:18 pm  #2539


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I also keep thinking if the simplest explanation is the one...so the tarmac scene would have to be right after Xmas day then...unless Mary has somehow kept John at bay.
Child not being his would be simpler...
But hang on a minute.
Why are we trying to prevent a traumatised John?
He's been traumatised throughout the series!


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

November 29, 2015 9:56 pm  #2540


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I don't see any way out of John being traumatised if Mary is to be gone, to be honest. That is why I am hoping that she's had an affair or turns out to be a fully-blown villain who does something (even more) horrible either to John directly or to Sherlock. Because I think it will be easier for John if his major emotion towards Mary is anger and not hurt or grief.


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"We'll live on starlight and crime scenes" - wordstrings


Team Hudders!
 
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum