Offline
I did love some of writing last series: Jamie Mathieson's episodes were very good, I thought. But this series has been consistently good. I keep waiting for an episode I don't like and it doesn't come!
Yes, the political was very timely ... although I was thinking not just of refugees, but immigrants in general and the Daily Mail hysteria over them. I think they were giving a clear message about not judging people by a splinter group of extremists. (I think it was more than a hint, to be honest).
Anyway, I used to love the Invasion of the Body Snatchers films, so this was right up my street!
These two parters are great!. It's fun to have the occasional cliff-hanger, or two connected stories, like the last two.I thought Jac was going to turn out to be a Zygon, only realised it was Clara at the last minute! Not sure if I'm a fan of evil Clara - not nearly as good as evil Missy, for instance, but I suppose she is supposed to be a Zygon. However it fits nicely with all the hints about hybrids, enemies inside friends, etc. I'm sure the real Clara can be saved - she didn't look very dead. But she's still got to go in some way, as she's leaving the show. Good point about Maisie - yes, it would make sense for her to make an appearance, or else what was that line about her role all about? But next week has to resolve the Zygon story, and I'm not sure why Clara would be stuck in that pod for another couple of episodes .... hmm.
Offline
Well, to be honest I didn't see all the episodes, so maybe I missed some of the best ones. The one you were talking about is the one with the twodimensional monsters? I did like that one. I also loved seeing the moon hatch, though the events leading up to that I thought were rather contrived, and Clara makes an idiotic decision.
I don't think they were referring to this refugee crisis because that wasn't happening when the episodes were written. I also thought it was more about negative reaction to immigrants in general, funny to have the Brits to play that part for a change.
Another thing, maybe a bit far fetched but Truth or Consequences: ISIS? It could really refer to any cultish group, including political ones.
I like the two parters too. Generally I record the show so I tend to see them right after each other anyway.I did love evil Clara, I totally didn't see the two final twists coming. And is it just me or was absolutely every speaking character except the Doctor in this episode female? I thought that was weird after a while. I don't think this is how they're going to kill Clara though, a bit too random for a compagnion that was in the show for so long. And don't we still have the Orson storyline hanging? Surely, she must be pregnant then. I don't think Moffat would just forget about that. Or can timelines be changed? They can't, can they? I missed the connection of Achildr and Clara, though, what is that about?
Offline
silverblaze wrote:
I don't think they were referring to this refugee crisis because that wasn't happening when the episodes were written.
Well, no, but think we just meant the issue in general, and commenting on how 'timely' it was. Erf, and yes, with the radical splinter groups, as well. Interesting having DW have that as an alien issue as well.
silverblaze wrote:
And don't we still have the Orson storyline hanging? Surely, she must be pregnant then. I don't think Moffat would just forget about that. Or can timelines be changed? They can't, can they? I missed the connection of Achildr and Clara, though, what is that about?
Wait… who… wait, what? Ack! Just facepalmed there, in amusement, since I'm good at noticing hints and keep up with arcs, but totally forget some past "side" characters! I totally forgot about him! Yeah, Moffat! But hey, here's a quote from him about that. But remember, we know he lies (just look at the very last line. the whole thing is interesting/funny in retrospect):
And we were just making comments about Ashildr and Clara because she promised (or playfully warned) the Doctor she'd be watching out over the people he left behind… remember we saw a brief glimpse of her again? So will be interesting to see how she comes back again.
And now, off in anticipation of Osgood, Clara, and whatever the heck that 'box' was!
Offline
SPOILERS FOLLOW ....
Ha ha, love that last line! And still possibly true, as we don't know if "Osgood" is a Zygon. I don't like the explanation about Orson. I feel he has to be a direct descendant of Danny if he looks exactly like him ... although thinking of it, it's more likely that he's a twin or a clone if he looks exactly like him. I wonder if Danny left some genetic material behind? I was convinced Clara has to be pregnant, but maybe they're going to leave that all behind in the last series and not refer to it. There's still unresolved stuff to deal with in this series. What's the last will and testament all about? What's the hybrid? Ashildr is protecting the companions and Osgood is protecting the world - what from?
I really enjoyed The Zygon Inversion. I loved teh Doctor's big, heartfelt, moving speech at the end. And then found out that he'd practiced it several times (at least I think so - I thought his comment about Kate's memory being wiped 16 times, meant that they'd been in that room for a while, with the Doctor trying various approaches and wiping memories until he got the "right" result? Is that what you all took to mean?)! That reminded me of his moving speech to the Fisher King, which turned to be a ploy to get him out of the way! Although I still think he meant what he said in this episode - it seemed to be pretty close to the bone, and fitted with other things he'd said.
I did think, oh, for goodness sake, why does it always have to come back to Clara (in the speech)? But then thought, as Bonnie is in a duplicate of Clara's body and Clara is able to connect with it, it probably made sense to bring her into it, if he was trying to influence Bonnie.
Was there ever a chance that Kate was going to push the button? I didn't think so. But then the Doctor had to wipe memories several times - was that because it went wrong with Bonnie, or because it went wrong with Kate? He does seem particularly grateful to Kate!
I loved that the whole point of the Osgood box was just to get people to talk! I couldn't decide if the message was pro- or anti- unilateral disarmament. Probably neither! Lure them in with weapons of mass destruction, then get them talking .
Offline
Or show that being a nuclear super power is just an empty promise?!
Offline
I just finished watching Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead from series 4, what a great story! And I finally get to see the beginning of the River Song arc. Now I am waiting for my tears to dry before I go collect the kids from school *sniffle*
Offline
Mmm, I'm not sure if I buy Moffat's explanation. I's possible, and the episode was a little piece of art by itself, so maybe they don't care so much about having that loose end, but still, the whole explanation offscreen? Maybe we'll see a little more of it. Or basically I think it'd be a great way for Clara to leave: no death and destruction, just that she now has a baby and a new life. It'd be nice for a change.
I really liked the Zygon Inversion. Bonnie was such a great villain and Clara cleverly still managed to send a message. And the memory wiping and all the failed trials make complete sense, of course Bonnie wouldn't be talked down so easily. And there were so many twists to the Osgood box.
I wasn't even quite sure what the little voice of Clara in the back of your head was supposed to mean. I thought that some of Clara's moral decisions were pretty idiotic. Probably because they were so plot-driven, like in the moon episode and in The Girl Who Lived, where the Doctor gave a very good reason not to get involved and she convinces him to help the village for no reason at all.
This is probably coincidence but the Doctor's speech reminded me of the tribal peace trials that were done in South Africa for crimes during the Apartheid regime, and I think also in other parts of Africa, with child soldiers and situations like that. The purpose of those rituals is not justice and punishment, but truth and forgiveness (thus breaking the cycle of violence). So as far as I'm aware, what he says is really done sometimes IRL in conflict resolution. I though that was cool.
Offline
ukaunz wrote:
I just finished watching Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead from series 4, what a great story! And I finally get to see the beginning of the River Song arc. Now I am waiting for my tears to dry before I go collect the kids from school *sniffle*
Ah, this is one of my favourite episodes ever. I think Moffat was at his best when he was writing episodes for DW without being the showrunner. His episodes during the RTD era are just brilliant. And apart from the fact that he gave River Song a great introduction here, he also gave Donna some absolutely heartbreaking moments.
Offline
Oh, I have mixed feelings about this latest episode! I was really looking forward to it and some bits were brilliant, and some bits didn't work. My gut feeling about it is tha Mark Gatiss's true love is horror rather than sci-fi, and that this would have made a brilliant horror/ghost/supernatural story, even if in a sci-fi setting. But I just couldn't make myself believe the "science" bit about "sleep" in eyes. It made no sense to me whatsover, to the extent that it affected my enjoyment of the episode.
I also felt not enough was made of the Shakespeare quotes. It was great to have Capaldi quoting Macbeth, but I'd love if the episode had been more about the meaning of sleep in that context. I was expecting it to be about insomnia rather than sandmen.
I thought Reece Shearsmith was great, and the ending was fantastic! The Blair Witch Project style I wasn't sure about, and I was irritated by the patches of interference, but it was great the way that it tied into the ending, and interesting to see a different type of episode. I liked the way the idea of this particular future was built up, the "grunt" was very well done, even if she had a rather simple story, and the future seemed already disturbing in some ways. I read afterwards that there may be a sequel to this one. It needs it really, as it has left the future of humanity hanging!
Offline
I'm glad I'm not the only one who felt we were just left hanging!
Oh and I didn't know it was Reece.
I kept looking at him thinking: god I know that guy, who is he?!
Yes, he was brilliant.
Well the Shakespeare link to sci fi is that it was the storyline form Forbidden Planet, which is based on The Tempest.
I suspect FP is one of Mark's fave films!
Offline
Oh yes, Forbidden Planet! It's years since I've seen that! But yes, that was the Tempest ... I just wish they'd done more with the idea of Macbeth in particular and guilt and insomnia. Morpheus wasn't causing insomnia as such but just taking away the need for sleep, without it causing any problems (apart from the creation of sandmen, which just didn't make sense to me). I think I expected more on the nature of sleep.
Offline
Ceratinly of interest to hubby and I: he suffers with sleep apnoea and I'm a total insomniac!
Offline
Oh, good, I wasn't the only one either! (even if I'm 'late!') ;P
Well, hey, they've been having a pretty darn nice season, always gonna be one or two that don't resonate with you. I just... wasn't sure what to make of it because the format of it right from the start I uncertainly hoped would work as a 'valid' part of the story, and the concept was certainly interesting, but I just didn't completely buy into it, like Liberty said. It just felt dubious, and yeah, left hanging in an odd way. *shrug* But that just me. Part of me half assumed it tied into the next one, again, but not sure it does! Except there was the shortest bit in the trailer of a raven poofing or coming out of a cloud of dust I think, which reminded me of the sandmen?
Also also: Rigsy and Ashildr! And Clara!! Anyone else get the sense that the Doctor has already seen her go, or been clued in that it's soon? He's almost-lost her a couple times already, and gotten a little more affectionate with, and commented 'it was the longest month of my life' the first time it happened, with the Vikings. Not to mention the presence of Ashildr again and how Clara looked in the trailer.... I just hope it's 'good'....
Offline
Russell wrote:
Oh, good, I wasn't the only one either! (even if I'm 'late!') ;P
Well, hey, they've been having a pretty darn nice season, always gonna be one or two that don't resonate with you. I just... wasn't sure what to make of it because the format of it right from the start I uncertainly hoped would work as a 'valid' part of the story, and the concept was certainly interesting, but I just didn't completely buy into it, like Liberty said. It just felt dubious, and yeah, left hanging in an odd way. *shrug* But that just me. Part of me half assumed it tied into the next one, again, but not sure it does! Except there was the shortest bit in the trailer of a raven poofing or coming out of a cloud of dust I think, which reminded me of the sandmen?
Also also: Rigsy and Ashildr! And Clara!! Anyone else get the sense that the Doctor has already seen her go, or been clued in that it's soon? He's almost-lost her a couple times already, and gotten a little more affectionate with, and commented 'it was the longest month of my life' the first time it happened, with the Vikings. Not to mention the presence of Ashildr again and how Clara looked in the trailer.... I just hope it's 'good'....
Yes! There's so much foreshadowing, and something gentle and sad going on there. I get the feeling there's something he's not telling us (and Clara?).
And on that theme, Peter Capaldi gave away a couple of major clues on the Graham Norton show last night.
For those that don't have iplayer, he said that tonight's episode is the end of Clara's story. And was cagey about Ashildr being the next companion. I don't watch Game of Thrones, but thought she was tied in to that - but wonder if she'll be the companion for the rest of this series? I'm sure there was a mention of an episode which only features the Doctor, so there would only be a couple of episodes left for her to feature in.
Last edited by Liberty (November 21, 2015 9:28 am)
Offline
Liberty wrote:
And on that theme, Peter Capaldi gave away a couple of major clues on the Graham Norton show last night.
Ooh, yeah? That must have been a neat interview!
reply to spoilers: (or not?)
Awww, man! And I can't watch it live tonight, but will keep that in mind! Yeah, makes sense they would leave an ep or two to 'wrap up' or 'move forward' after something like that. But Ashildr… yeah… she could come back, but Maisie Williams doing two tv shows would be a little tricky. I just hope Clara gets a good (non-fatal?) ending!
Offline
I'm glad to see I wasn't the only one who was a bit unimpressed with Sleep No More. I though it was a bit chaotic and the monsters were a bit silly. I think I agree with Liberty that more focus on the Shakespeare would have been better. And instead of the monsters, more focus the head cams plotpoint and on the idea of Morpheus and that if you don't visit him in your sleep, shit will happen. (Apparently, IRL, if people don't sleep, they die eventually and no one quite knows why that is.) Overall, I felt like the episode was a bit rushed and the really good bits were gone before we had time to reflect on them.
Maybe it's just me but I tend to feel a bit underwhelmed with Marks episodes. Robots of Sherwood, The Crimson Horror Stories, and now this one. Not terrible, but I can't say I'm super enthousiastic either. Maybe his style just doesn't appeal to me.
Face the Raven: am I the only one who feels a tiny bit traumatised?
Was this the same writer who did The Woman Who Lived? Is she new, I've not seen her name before but last season I didn't remember a female writer.Though surely, the Orson storyline is cleared up now. I'm not sure how to feel about it. On the one hand it seems like a very offhand way to kill off a character that was so important. On the other hand, it was also quite well foreshadowed; Clara had done a lot of stupid things in this series and the previous one, not in the last place convincing the Doctor to help the Viking village, despite his very legitimate concerns, thus creating Achildr. Maybe it was foreshadowing for this thing, or maybe they used a few awkward character moments to their advantage, who knows. At least it felt IC when one of her reckless actions finally had consequences. The goodbye was so beautiful, major angst.
I think that's what I didn't like about Clara: she was funny and brave and kind and beautiful, but she could be so stupid and unthinking at times that I sometimes had a hard time relating to her. So in a way, her end seems fitting.I do hope the next compagnion will be a bit brighter.
Offline
I thought it was just because I'm only part-Whovian, that I didn't know the writer...
She struck me as a Sherlock fan!
Oh this was sad.
If I'd been alone, I may have shed a tear.
Last edited by besleybean (November 22, 2015 4:21 pm)
Offline
besleybean wrote:
I thought it was just because I'm only part-Whovian, that I didn't know the writer...
She struck me as a Sherlock fan!
I was watching Face the Raven last night, and thought a couple of times that the Doctor was really reminding me of Sherlock...
Offline
Well, I did shed a tear! The music helped, I really appreciated the music after it being missing last time (not that I'm complaining, as it wouldn't have worked well in Sleep No More). This episode has been in the news over concerns that
was too traumatic for younger viewers. Personally I found Danny's end much more horrible. And Amy's baby being taken away was very disturbing. AnywayClara's death
so much for Ashildr protecting the companions! She only gets the chance to protect one, and then she can't do it! Unless Clara isn't really dead .... you never know, but I think Jenna Coleman has left the show and is doing other things. She was very good in this episode, and in the Zygon Inversion, I thought. It doesn't look like Ashildr is the new companion, so maybe we'll be companion-less for the rest of the series? We seem to be moving back to the beginning of t he series now, with the last will and testament appearing again (does that mean Ashildr will be back, even if not as a companion?).
Yes, silverblaze, what about the Orson storyline? I didn't think that was the best way to clear it up! I suppose we just have to accept he was Danny's relative but not Clara's, and just happened to look exactly like Danny.
Offline
Well, geez, that was certainly another emotional end! Sad, stupid, fitting, noble… but certainly brave, I've no doubt the Doctor will agree.
Maybe I need to watch it again, though…
Oh, and btw, it wasn't the same writer as The Woman Who Lived, but yes, very cool that both were the new female writers this season!Not to miss things and all, but not quite sure I get why Me wouldn't help Clara. You can have the punishment removed, or pass it on, but you can't "cheat it", according to what they said. That means, with what Me said in apology about, that you can't do both and once it was passed, it was out of her hands to take it back? But… what about the fact that the murder was known to not be a murder? Erf… ohkay.
And then there's also feeling silly like I'm forgetting something else - I thought Rigsy was just a random guy that ran into Clara and befriended/helped her in his debut episode. Only vaguely recall a possible brother/cousin to Danny thing mentioned - were they? And that's why, with his child, that story clue was wrapped up? … Ok again, suppose that mostly works.
Otherwise, a bit twistedly strange but neat episode and the way they built it up reminds me of Gaiman's hidden underground in Neverwhere. Like the idea of places like that existing, and very touching goodbye as well. But… oh boy… someone trying to get their hands on the Doctor again… someone besides Gallifrey? Although I know he's headed back there at some point!? And with two eps left!!!