BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



September 14, 2015 10:25 am  #1921


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Right. I think some writers just write out their fantasies and use fanfiction as an outlet for desires or preferences that they perhaps can't actualise in other ways - or don't want to actualise, as I hope it's the case for this writer!

 

 

September 14, 2015 10:35 am  #1922


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Swanpride wrote:

It's a general problem...there are just too many writers which misuse the tagging system. They use "canon pairing" and then write a story which doesn't have a canon pairing, they use "harry/Ginny" (which actually is a pairing with a strong following), but every second fanfic which uses the tag has actually a different final paring. It's not even deliberate in some cases.
It wasn't my intention to openly criticise, which is why I didn't mention the name of the writer initially, and only did so because it caused confusion. It was supposed to be an observation how obsessive some fans are about hating Mary to a degree, which goes way past the usual bashing fics you'll find in any fandom.

I see. But I think, if people want to obsessively hate on a character because it makes them feel better, why not? Mary is a controversial character and it's understandable that she would elicit such a strong reaction. I don’t understand being disturbed by the hate – just like I don’t understand people getting upset that Sally Donovan gets hate and feel the need to defend her at all costs. Both are grey characters, both can be read in different ways, and my idea is that why be surprised at people manifesting their opposition and even hate for them? They’re fictional characters. They’re not going to be offended. And people hating on them will not stop you liking them if you do like them. My view is that, yes discussion is certainly good, but ultimately we should all understand people will see characters in a different way and hate is a part of this. And if hating obsessively helps the person feel better about what happened in the story (because it was certainly confusing, messed up, and understandably people were not going to like a person who shot their beloved main character, no matter who that was) then why be surprised? Let them, and scroll past.

 

 

September 14, 2015 10:48 am  #1923


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I have no problem with different opinions on characters. Some people like a character, some people dislike them. It's all fair.

However, if someone "obsessively hates" a fictional character, perhaps it's time to take a step back and get a bit of perspective. 

I've seen it in other fandoms as well. If you get too emotionally invested into a fictional world, and then it fails to live up to your expectations, then the reaction can become blown out of all proportions.


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"We'll live on starlight and crime scenes" - wordstrings


Team Hudders!
 
 

September 14, 2015 11:36 am  #1924


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

yes, I guess I interpreted it as 'really, REALLY hate a character' and not meaning that somebody doesn't sleep at night because of that character/show In that case I totally agree with you!

 

September 14, 2015 12:24 pm  #1925


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Vhanja wrote:

I have no problem with different opinions on characters. Some people like a character, some people dislike them. It's all fair.

However, if someone "obsessively hates" a fictional character, perhaps it's time to take a step back and get a bit of perspective. 

I've seen it in other fandoms as well. If you get too emotionally invested into a fictional world, and then it fails to live up to your expectations, then the reaction can become blown out of all proportions.

Agreed.  And these, I do believe, are the exception rather than the rule, and they have problems that go far beyond any work of fiction.
 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proud President and Founder of the OSAJ.  
Honorary German  
"Anyone who takes himself too seriously always runs the risk of looking ridiculous; anyone who can consistently laugh at himself does not".
 -Vaclav Havel 
"Life is full of wonder, Love is never wrong."   Melissa Ethridge

I ship it harder than Mrs. Hudson.
    
 
 

September 14, 2015 12:40 pm  #1926


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

tonnaree wrote:

Agreed.  And these, I do believe, are the exception rather than the rule, and they have problems that go far beyond any work of fiction.
 

Oh, absolutely, they are in the minority. Most fans manage to keep on the healthy side of obsessed. 


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"We'll live on starlight and crime scenes" - wordstrings


Team Hudders!
 
 

September 14, 2015 12:41 pm  #1927


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Swanpride wrote:

I wrote "nearly as" not "just as". And the fanfic author has the name "Marythepet" which should tell you everything about what the stories are about. I have no idea if its a male or female one,...

And still you wrote "his". Is it because if a crowd is 90% female and 10% male, you find it more appropriate to call an unknown member "he/his" even if "he" is most likely a woman?
Some feel it might make a male person uncomfortable to be addressed as a woman, and they want to spare them from this. While women are used to that already, they often don't count as women even if they are the vast majority in a group.

 

Last edited by Harriet (September 14, 2015 12:43 pm)


Eventually everyone will support Johnlock.   Independent OSAJ Affiliate

... but there may be some new players now. It’s okay. The East Wind takes us all in the end.
 

September 14, 2015 12:56 pm  #1928


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I honestly don't think Swanpride meant anything by using "his."  It surprised me a little because fic is mostly a female thing, but it being a tick of the language is a simple explination.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proud President and Founder of the OSAJ.  
Honorary German  
"Anyone who takes himself too seriously always runs the risk of looking ridiculous; anyone who can consistently laugh at himself does not".
 -Vaclav Havel 
"Life is full of wonder, Love is never wrong."   Melissa Ethridge

I ship it harder than Mrs. Hudson.
    
 
 

September 14, 2015 12:56 pm  #1929


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

And still, it's ok to call someone who is most likely a woman (but might be a man) "he" because a man might not enjoy being wrongly addressed? Women pay here with the loss of their visibility in public.
Is this gender fair? I don't think so.

Edit: And no, this is not about anybody's intention, but the way it goes if there is no awareness of it:
Women are being made invisible, when writers are by default male.

Last edited by Harriet (September 14, 2015 4:01 pm)


Eventually everyone will support Johnlock.   Independent OSAJ Affiliate

... but there may be some new players now. It’s okay. The East Wind takes us all in the end.
 

September 14, 2015 2:31 pm  #1930


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

While you make a good point about gender fairness, I do not think that this is what was intended. On the other hand, even writing he/she, his/her would also not include all genders (as it implies gender binary) and thus would still not bring us much further gender-fairness-wise. But this is getting us quite far away from the original topic, so maybe this discussion deserves a place of its own.


****************************************************************************************************************************************
We balance probabilities and choose the most likely. It is the scientific use of the imagination.    
     Thread Starter
 

September 14, 2015 2:52 pm  #1931


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Mod:  I feel this is a little slip and that we should let it go.  Someone can always open a thread solely devoted to gender issues in the fandom is they want to.  Thank's all.

TOPIC!!

Many people have strong feelings about Mary.  Why is that you reckon?  


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proud President and Founder of the OSAJ.  
Honorary German  
"Anyone who takes himself too seriously always runs the risk of looking ridiculous; anyone who can consistently laugh at himself does not".
 -Vaclav Havel 
"Life is full of wonder, Love is never wrong."   Melissa Ethridge

I ship it harder than Mrs. Hudson.
    
 
 

September 14, 2015 4:39 pm  #1932


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Swanpride wrote:

Wait, there is a whole tumble with the title "marybegone"? That is nearly as disturbing as this fanfiction writer who does nothing but torture her in all his stories....

I know Marybegone, she's a friend of mine. And, actually-- though she can be critical of the series, and expecially of John's actions in s3-- she doesn't hate John, and is a hopeful Johnlocker. She's not a writer, either. And also German. 

Why is it that 90% of my online friends are all German?   It must be that they can psychically tell I'm already pre-wired to go there-- it's all those wonderful music festivals!!!! And art. And even more music!!!  And castles. And FOOD!!!...etc, etc, ... Wunderbar!

Anyway, I see what you're saying , Swanpride-- but, Marybegone is actually a good egg, though sometimes a bit prickly...

Last edited by RavenMorganLeigh (September 14, 2015 4:39 pm)

 

September 14, 2015 4:41 pm  #1933


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

About fan obsession, may I humbly submit that none of us are in a position to throw stones, lest we shatter our own glass houses? 

I know a lot of my friends would be looking at me like-- wha???? as far as how active I've been getting to be in Fandom...

Last edited by RavenMorganLeigh (September 14, 2015 4:58 pm)

 

September 14, 2015 4:47 pm  #1934


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

SusiGo wrote:

Swanpride: I have no idea what fanfic author you mean. My first though was Silentauror but if there is something you might blame her for it is that her Mary tortures others. 

Silent's another pal of mine, and I think she'd tell you (as she's said in the comments section of her fic, often and vociferoously) that's she's only writing Mary as she's presented in canon: taking what Mofftiss left us with, and extrapolating from that-- building on it. And, she's been know to get a LOT of hate and even death threats from Mary fans who were unhappy with the way she portrays Mary in her fics. She was also once even told that she should just leave the fandom, because one of her story arcs had John being kind of a putz! 

 

September 14, 2015 4:55 pm  #1935


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

tonnaree wrote:

Mod:  I feel this is a little slip and that we should let it go.  Someone can always open a thread solely devoted to gender issues in the fandom is they want to.  Thank's all.

TOPIC!!

Many people have strong feelings about Mary.  Why is that you reckon?  

Well, for one-- she shot Sherlock!!!!!!!

It's kind of like "adopting" your best friend's new love interest and giving them the benefit of the doubt--and they FOOL you. They trick you into beleiving that they like you, too-- that they're just wonderful for your friend, and though there's sadness that you're no longer the first mate-- you go OUT OF YOUR WAY to be friends and support the new relationship-- and what does she do???? SHE SHOOTS YOU!!!! 

AAAAARRRRRGGGHHHHH!!!!!!!

Ahem. Sigh. 

Okay, I'm better now...

 

September 14, 2015 4:56 pm  #1936


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Mod:  Still way off topic here folks.  The subject of discusion is Mary not fan fic authors.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proud President and Founder of the OSAJ.  
Honorary German  
"Anyone who takes himself too seriously always runs the risk of looking ridiculous; anyone who can consistently laugh at himself does not".
 -Vaclav Havel 
"Life is full of wonder, Love is never wrong."   Melissa Ethridge

I ship it harder than Mrs. Hudson.
    
 
 

September 14, 2015 5:32 pm  #1937


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Wow, I´m surprised how this topic derailed. 

Still, whether the blogger is called "marybegone" or "happy-snowman", she only reblogged someone else´s meta. So she´s innocent in this. 

And now back to the topic - I agree with the meta that Sherlock and John do not appear to have some plan to deal with Mary or CAM in HLV. John asks Sherlock if he doesn´t have a plan when they are alone, so it would be beside the point if they already agreed on some "battle-strategy" befohand. Also, some things John says on the tarmac, like "The game is over" etc. point to the conclusion that John feels everything was screwed badly and it´s all over now. 


-----------------------------------

I cannot live without brainwork. What else is there to live for? Stand at the window there. Was there ever such a dreary, dismal, unprofitable world? See how the yellow fog swirls down the street and drifts across the dun-coloured houses. What could be more hopelessly prosaic and material? What is the use of having powers, Doctor, when one has no field upon which to exert them?

 

September 14, 2015 5:41 pm  #1938


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

nakahara wrote:

Wow, I´m surprised how this topic derailed. 

Still, whether the blogger is called "marybegone" or "happy-snowman", she only reblogged someone else´s meta. So she´s innocent in this. 

And now back to the topic - I agree with the meta that Sherlock and John do not appear to have some plan to deal with Mary or CAM in HLV. John asks Sherlock if he doesn´t have a plan when they are alone, so it would be beside the point if they already agreed on some "battle-strategy" befohand. Also, some things John says on the tarmac, like "The game is over" etc. point to the conclusion that John feels everything was screwed badly and it´s all over now. 

And, to me-- that's proof. 

Agreed, no plan in place. 

 

September 14, 2015 6:00 pm  #1939


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Still, I was speculating - could it be that John has no plan together with Sherlock... but he has a plan concerning Mary together with Mycroft? Is it possible that while Sherlock was in hospital, Mycroft forced John to spill the beans and prepared some "battle-strategy" against Mary with him?

Mycroft and John often dealt together behind Sherlock´s back before and John, albeit reluctantly, fullfilled many Mycroft´s requests. TRF was actually a first occassion when John was not participating on Mycroft´s plans. So are they together in this also in HLV?


-----------------------------------

I cannot live without brainwork. What else is there to live for? Stand at the window there. Was there ever such a dreary, dismal, unprofitable world? See how the yellow fog swirls down the street and drifts across the dun-coloured houses. What could be more hopelessly prosaic and material? What is the use of having powers, Doctor, when one has no field upon which to exert them?

 

September 14, 2015 6:06 pm  #1940


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

nakahara wrote:

Still, I was speculating - could it be that John has no plan together with Sherlock... but he has a plan concerning Mary together with Mycroft? Is it possible that while Sherlock was in hospital, Mycroft forced John to spill the beans and prepared some "battle-strategy" against Mary with him?

Mycroft and John often dealt together behind Sherlock´s back before and John, albeit reluctantly, fullfilled many Mycroft´s requests. TRF was actually a first occassion when John was not participating on Mycroft´s plans. So are they together in this also in HLV?

I would LOVE that. It would actually be better-- a plan to get rid of Mary, where (1) Sherlock couldn't be blamed,  (2) something John could live with, (3) Sherlock's been through enough, and doesn't need to be in the line of fire anymore-- at least for now. It could also explain Mycroft's conspicuous absence throughout HLV, particularly since it's told from Sherlock's POV.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum