Offline
I would say she is even worse because Sherlock knew they were villains while he trusted Mary.
Offline
NatureNoHumansNo wrote:
oh in real life maybe, but in the show, she's not shown as a baddie, let alone an adversary, the same way than Moriarty or Magnussen.
SHERLOCK: How good a shot are you?
MARY: How badly do you want to find out? *casually raises gun in his direction* (Or what she believes is his direction). Pretty much threatening to shoot him....AGAIN. Someone severely wounded who's only just got out of hospital.
And then there's the scene where she's hovering over him when he's all dazed and doped up on morphine "You don't tell John" etc.
Two scenes which, for me, definitely SHOW her as a baddie.
Offline
And nothing says he doesn't trust her at the end of season 3, or better, it appears that he trust her again. What we see is a settled situation between them ( you may think/ hope it's fake, and maybe season 4 will change things, but I just stick on what is actually shown)
Offline
SusiGo wrote:
I would say she is even worse because Sherlock knew they were villains while he trusted Mary.
Yes, I agree. To me, Mary is the real villain of this episode much more than Magnussen.
Offline
Sherlock Holmes wrote:
NatureNoHumansNo wrote:
oh in real life maybe, but in the show, she's not shown as a baddie, let alone an adversary, the same way than Moriarty or Magnussen.
SHERLOCK: How good a shot are you?
MARY: How badly do you want to find out? *casually raises gun in his direction* (Or what she believes is his direction). Pretty much threatening to shoot him....AGAIN. Someone severely wounded who's only just got out of hospital.
And then there's the scene where she's hovering over him when he's all dazed and doped up on morphine "You don't tell John" etc.
Two scenes which, for me, definitely SHOW her as a baddie.
I agree that she appears as a baddie in those scene, and, that's one of the tension line of the episode... but the scene after, Sherlock states she saved his live ( the back to what I said ..." you may think/ hope it's fake, and maybe season 4 will change things, but I just stick on what is actually shown")"
Offline
Sherlock Holmes wrote:
SusiGo wrote:
I would say she is even worse because Sherlock knew they were villains while he trusted Mary.
Yes, I agree. To me, Mary is the real villain of this episode much more than Magnussen.
Same with me. Because there is the element of surprise. With Magnussen we know from the very beginning that he is bad guy.
And then there is Mary kicking the coin over so that Sherlock has to bend down and pick it up.
Offline
SusiGo wrote:
Sherlock Holmes wrote:
SusiGo wrote:
I would say she is even worse because Sherlock knew they were villains while he trusted Mary.
Yes, I agree. To me, Mary is the real villain of this episode much more than Magnussen.
Same with me. Because there is the element of surprise. With Magnussen we know from the very beginning that he is bad guy.
And then there is Mary kicking the coin over so that Sherlock has to bend down and pick it up.
Oh yeah, that's really mean.
Offline
Nevertheless, you overthink details, assume what happens off-screen and erase factuality. Wich makes your analysis polluted by fantasy.
Offline
On the other hand, many people take what we see at the end of HLV for granted - everybody forgave Mary, she is trusted again etc - and that in a show that has refrained from showing the audience everything they need to know more often than once.
So an analysis that only sticks to what we see can never be profound enough.
Last edited by Schmiezi (June 17, 2015 4:09 am)
Offline
I agree, Schmiezi. This isn't a show where you just swallow what appears to be the obvious explanation and be done with it. Or, yes, of course you can do that if you like. But there is nothing wrong with looking beneath the surface and behind facades... after all, that's what Sherlock is doing all the time.
And to me believing that everything is just fine at the end of HLV is an assumption that is polluted by fanatsy. But there you go.
Offline
Sherlock Holmes wrote:
NatureNoHumansNo wrote:
oh in real life maybe, but in the show, she's not shown as a baddie, let alone an adversary, the same way than Moriarty or Magnussen.
SHERLOCK: How good a shot are you?
MARY: How badly do you want to find out? *casually raises gun in his direction* (Or what she believes is his direction). Pretty much threatening to shoot him....AGAIN. Someone severely wounded who's only just got out of hospital.
And then there's the scene where she's hovering over him when he's all dazed and doped up on morphine "You don't tell John" etc.
Two scenes which, for me, definitely SHOW her as a baddie.
To me, it's not just scenes with the character that decides whether someone is a baddie or not - it's the main character's reaction to them. And in no scene between Sherlock and Mary does he see her, or treat her, as a baddie.
Offline
But one could consider the scene in the empty house with Sherlock having put up Mary's picture up the facade that he sees her as dangerous.
Offline
Yes, but that doesn't make her a villain.
Offline
But this would mean that Sherlock's playful banter and obvious initial fascination with Moriarty would indicate he is no baddie either, wouldn't it?
Offline
No, I think it's made very clear that everybody views Moriarty as a baddie.
Offline
Not that alone, no, but the whole exchange in the empty house makes me think she is a badbadbad...
Offline
Vhanja wrote:
No, I think it's made very clear that everybody views Moriarty as a baddie.
Magnussen seems to regard Mary as a baddie par excellence.
Offline
I trust Sherlock's judgement above Magnussen's.
Offline
So you think Sherlock would regard someone who has killed numerous people and married his best friend under false pretences and as good as killed himself not as a baddie? Sorry, but I cannot believe that for the life of me.
Offline
Well, they should at least be heard equally.