BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



February 22, 2015 4:36 pm  #401


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I've wondered about that too (why John wanted "normal" Mary) - it seems to show a gigantic lack of insight.   But then she didn't come across as somebody who was tied to normalcy.   She was quite fiesty, not fazed by anything, and presumably open to new experiences had John wanted to go in that direction.    I suppose Sherlock maybe has a point that (asssuming Mary's not a plant) they both wanted to tone themselves down and try a normal life (although for different reasons), and both were drawn to people who outwardly wanted the same but underneath craved excitement.   The difference is that Mary knew that John had already had an exciting life, but John didn't know anything about Mary - he could have been drawn to a capacity for adventure, but not drawn to the fact that she was a secret agent/assassin.   I do think it's unfair to accuse of him that.

But at that point, Sherlock seems to want things resolved quickly, as he only has a short time before the ambulance arrives.  I can forgive him for saying what it takes to get to the point things need to be. 

Last edited by Liberty (February 22, 2015 4:38 pm)

 

February 22, 2015 5:01 pm  #402


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Vhanja wrote:

Zatoichi wrote:

Yes, I'm totally with you on this.. His life just fell apart around him, and they team up to tell him he chose her and shouldn't be surprised now. That already rubs me the wrong way in the beginning of TEH, when both tell him he's overreacting, after everything he went through. Maybe this is supposed to give a lighthearted note to something that'd be overly grave otherwise.. enable them to continue their relationship on the same terms as before because John kind of agrees that they have a point.. In a way continue his laid-back reactions to being drugged, ordered around and brought into mortal danger because of his connection to Sherlock? Oh alright, I'm furious but then again this is what I like and I just had the best time of my life? Probably the show could never have worked without this pattern of behaviour, and we shouldn't be surprised that his reaction to Mary's betrayal also conforms to this? (Trying to convince myself here ;p)

It makes me really happy to have someone else see this as well. John's emotional reactions have always been just handwaved away by Sherlock, and now also by Mary. They are sort of ganging up on him, telling him that he is overreacting and that he chose this. 

Yes, in this regard Sherlock has a point when he says that the woman he fell in love with confirms to a pattern.. obviously John doesn´t mind too much to have his feelings handwaved away and being slightly mocked by his significant others. He could have noticed that in Mary, if not the assassin-part..

This is not to say I blame Sherlock in this scene, he doesn´t have much time and needs to reconcile them quickly.. I don´t think he willingly tries to belittle or manipulate John. Just that I really feel for John here nevertheless, because it´s such a tough situation for him. They are all horribly suffering here.. (That doesn´t mean I subscribe in any way to the "Saint John" interpretation, or see John as the eternal victim who can´t do wrong.. quite the contrary in fact. Still Mary "wasn´t supposed to be like that", and I in no way buy that John sensed something "dangerous" or psychopathic in Mary and chose her because of that. Why Sherlock still says it I don´t know, maybe because he knew that it would cool him down enough to make him sit down and listen for a while? Maybe because he thought it would make him cross the wild sea of rage until he reaches the calm waters on the other side? ^^)

 

February 22, 2015 5:50 pm  #403


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I think that is a good point. Sherlock is trying to get his point across in a very short time. I think that is quite clear, and that is why he is budging in, in the first place. If not, he could just have let them sort it out in their own time.

I do think John minds, though. It's clear that he does from his statements of frustration. 


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"We'll live on starlight and crime scenes" - wordstrings


Team Hudders!
 
 

February 22, 2015 6:10 pm  #404


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

And thinking about it, what Sherlock says isn't that bad.   He's just saying that John is drawn to certain types of people and situations.  That's something John already knows.   So subconsciously, he was drawn to Mary because she conformed to that pattern.  I mean, he's drawn to Sherlock from the moment he meets him, I think, before he knows, consciously, what Sherlock has to offer him.   It's possible that he sensed something about Mary and that's why he fell for her so quickly.  

I think what Mary says is worse - she suggests that he somehow knew she was an assassin and married her because of it.   That's patently untrue.  (And I don't like the way she says it either!). 

 

February 22, 2015 6:12 pm  #405


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I think it is quite bad. John clearly interprets it the same way that I do - that it's his own fault for having chose her. Something I think is a rather horrible thing to say. And it makes no sense to me that he should be drawn to her for somehow noticing something in her that neither him nor Sherlock is aware of. It makes no sense to me.


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"We'll live on starlight and crime scenes" - wordstrings


Team Hudders!
 
 

February 22, 2015 6:42 pm  #406


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I agree, but if he WAS drawn to Sherlock even when he had very little information about him.  So I can believe that he was drawn to Mary because he sensed something about her, even if he thought he was choosing her because she was very normal.  What I don't believe is that he was drawn to her because he thought she could be a killer - I think if he'd known the truth at the beginning, he wouldn't have let himself fall for her.   With Sherlock, it's different - even though people are suggesting he's a potential killer, John doesn't really believe it (I don't think so, anyway).

 

February 22, 2015 7:35 pm  #407


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Sherlock was quite open from the very beginning about who he was - John was dragged on to a crime scene before he had even decided if he wanted to move in or not. There wasn't much subconscious attraction there. 


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"We'll live on starlight and crime scenes" - wordstrings


Team Hudders!
 
 

February 22, 2015 7:58 pm  #408


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I thought there was some sort of chemistry right from when they met, even before going to the crime scene.  But maybe it's my imagination because I knew from the beginning that they were going to be together. 

Last edited by Liberty (February 23, 2015 7:38 am)

 

February 22, 2015 9:15 pm  #409


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I actually think the -...John your abnormally attracted...you chose her...-speach is the truest thing Sherlock says In the confrontation.
Everything else is based on guesswork...

But what Sherlock means is...you chose her instead of me ...how many people heard that ?

By trying to be dangerous adventuring John with Sherlock....and husband grass mowing suburbian father type John with Mary...and keep both lives...John lost his chance to actually choose anything...and because of the baby (something else he didn't choose) he is stuck with it like it or not.

That for me is the most annoying thing about Mary..she's on the run from her past F ups...trys to shoot her way out of her present F up...and has a future with John because of the baby...which was another F up.
She never has any responsibilities or consequences....unlike Sherlock and John...who seem to be paying for everything that happened because of her..no matter how cute pretty or funny she is....and..how shallow is that?.
Does anyone think the reunion would have happened if Mary wasn't pregnant? And isn't that an awful...pregnant wooman gets her man unfairly cliche ....

 

February 22, 2015 11:05 pm  #410


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

You all have good points here and almost every interpretation seems plausible.

Here is my outlook on things: when Sherlock says the words "you chose her", he obviously does it with pain and neither his face nor tone suggest he is riling out John pointlessly - for a dying person that would be a very foolish endeavour. Those words aren´t that hurtful or bellitling anyway. Is it possible that Sherlock is just pointing out to John that now - after he chose Mary and made her his wife - he kind of took partial responsibility for her fate and instead of arguing, he should face the dire situation as it is and stop pondering about why she turned up an assassin (something neither of them could prevent nor influence)? John was hurt by his remark, but that was probably misunderstanding of Sherlock words?

What puzzles me about John is his inexplicable pasivity considering the USB stick he got from Mary. I think the stick could make a difference in a situation they were in. John could maybe extract from it the names of Mary´s former colleagues - enemies that were after her - contact them with ifake nformations concerning Mary and trap and neutralise them, possibly even with the help of Mycroft. If he didn´t want to know a thing about Mary´s past, he could ask Sherlock to read the stick and extract the names from it. They would have at least some chance to prepare for a danger facing them. But John apparently remains inactive - for months - and then burns the stick uselessly (I presume he dealt with the stick like that, because Sherlock´s self-sacrifice was still needed at the end of HLV, so obviously John didn´t deal with the danger beforehand). Which is very strange. 


-----------------------------------

I cannot live without brainwork. What else is there to live for? Stand at the window there. Was there ever such a dreary, dismal, unprofitable world? See how the yellow fog swirls down the street and drifts across the dun-coloured houses. What could be more hopelessly prosaic and material? What is the use of having powers, Doctor, when one has no field upon which to exert them?

 

February 22, 2015 11:19 pm  #411


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I think he says the words with pain because he literally was in pain. And if John had misinterpreted, why didn't Sherlock say so? Correct him? Instead, no matter how John becomes more and more enraged and hurt by Sherlock's words (up until the point of actually threatening him), Sherlock just keeps going. Why? Because he wants to hammer home the point he is trying to make, and he needs to do it fast because he is running out of time.


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"We'll live on starlight and crime scenes" - wordstrings


Team Hudders!
 
 

February 23, 2015 3:04 pm  #412


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Interesting note: in canon, the Agra treasure box was empty. I guess that's why many people suspect the stick to be empty too.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I still believe that love conquers all!

     

"Quick, man, if you love me."
 

February 23, 2015 3:09 pm  #413


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

That is true. And in Canon the Agra treasure as such was not something negative as are the alleged contents of the flash drive. The only difficulty it presented was the fact that it would have made Mary far richer than Watson and he probably could not have married her. 


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 

February 23, 2015 3:12 pm  #414


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Not sure if the stick was empty or not, but I am convinced that Sherlock did look at it.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proud President and Founder of the OSAJ.  
Honorary German  
"Anyone who takes himself too seriously always runs the risk of looking ridiculous; anyone who can consistently laugh at himself does not".
 -Vaclav Havel 
"Life is full of wonder, Love is never wrong."   Melissa Ethridge

I ship it harder than Mrs. Hudson.
    
 
 

February 23, 2015 3:26 pm  #415


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

But it was not something negative directly connected to the character of Mary Morstan. 


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 

February 23, 2015 3:26 pm  #416


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Yes, the treasure in the canon too was obtained through vile murder - maybe that´s one more reason why canonical Mary was happy to get rid of it.


-----------------------------------

I cannot live without brainwork. What else is there to live for? Stand at the window there. Was there ever such a dreary, dismal, unprofitable world? See how the yellow fog swirls down the street and drifts across the dun-coloured houses. What could be more hopelessly prosaic and material? What is the use of having powers, Doctor, when one has no field upon which to exert them?

 

February 23, 2015 3:32 pm  #417


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sign_of_the_Four

 Short cut for those who want to take a look at it.
 


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I still believe that love conquers all!

     

"Quick, man, if you love me."
 

February 23, 2015 3:48 pm  #418


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

I think the best clue to Marys past was the cyrillic AGRA / АГРА files
In Magnussens mindpalace.
Very Von Bork.(spy in hlb)...and they looked very much like the files Mycroft had on asassins in TRF assuming they are based on something he actually saw...and maybe thats the info on the memory stick.
This gives Mary an eastern europe connection...amusing considering the - Sherlock was there tracking a Moriarty connection @the start...and the mission to eastern europe that would see Sherlock dead In six months@the end.

 

February 26, 2015 8:12 am  #419


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

An interesting detail. In TSoT we get this (source: ArianedeVere):

MARY (handing him an RSVP card): John’s cousin. Top table?
SHERLOCK (looking at the card): Hmm. Hates you. Can’t even bear to think about you.
MARY (looking up at him): Seriously?
SHERLOCK: Second class post, cheap card ... (he sniffs it and grimaces) ... bought at a petrol station. Look at the stamp: three attempts at licking. She’s obviously unconsciously retaining saliva.
MARY: Ah. (Over her shoulder to John) Let’s stick her by the bogs.
[Transcriber’s note: ‘bogs’ is a slang word for ‘toilets’.]
SHERLOCK: Oh yes.
(He sits down. Mary leans closer to him.)
MARY: Who else hates me?
(Instantly Sherlock hands her a sheet of paper. There’s a long list of names on it.)
MARY: Oh great – thanks(!)

Of course this is played for fun, but still. Sherlock and Mary are talking about how half of the wedding party hate the bride and throughout this conversation the bridegroom is completely absorbed in the contents of Sherlock's inbox. This is the same John Watson who punched a high-ranking police officer for calling his best friend a weirdo and rebukes the very same best friend whenever he gets rude to other people. Just wondering … 


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 

February 26, 2015 10:08 am  #420


Re: Mary – the subject of discussion

Looks like he is more interested in solving cases with Sherlock than in planning his own wedding. 

Only five or six names is still quite a lot of hateful guests, I suppose. 


------------------------------
"To fake the death of one sibling may be regarded as a misfortune; to fake the death of both looks like carelessness." Oscar Wilde about Mycroft Holmes

"It is what it is says love." (Erich Fried)

“Enjoy the journey of life and not just the endgame. I’m also a great believer in treating others as you would like to be treated.” (Benedict Cumberbatch)



 
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum