Offline
Have you also watched 'WikiLeaks - We steal Secrets'?
Offline
I confess I have not watched TFE because, rather superficially, I'm worried I'll have the same adverse reaction as I had watched Cumberbatch in Atonement--that fear of that unnerving feeling of watching him so completely transformed into someone else. Terrible me, I know. But now seeing you all raving about how good it is I can't wait to grab my own DVD!
Offline
Polar, on the one hand I can understand why you are hesitant to watch TFE, on the other hand: But that's why we love that man so much, isn't it? Because he is able to transform himself so perfectly into someone else and thereby Benedict vanishes almost completely. You'd really miss out on something by not watching TFE - I absolutely loved him in that film.
Last edited by SolarSystem (February 25, 2014 5:15 am)
Offline
I will, Solar! Thanks so much. Your discussions and reviews here have convinced me to watch it. Benedict also did state he was very proud of this film. Now to grab the DVD.
Offline
I love it!
Offline
Le Bear Polar wrote:
I will, Solar! Thanks so much. Your discussions and reviews here have convinced me to watch it. Benedict also did state he was very proud of this film. Now to grab the DVD.
I'm sure you've also already come across the spoilerish TFE thread, but just in case:
Offline
Does the DVD have subtitles? I would prefer to buy it now to waiting for the German edition but subtitles would be nice.
Offline
It's taken me a while but I finally got to see this. Honestly, I didn't like the movie itself that much. Not saying it was a bad moive. Just didn't find it very enjoyable. Although it was visually interesting in general it left me cold.
But I"m glad I watched it if only for Ben's great performance. He was uncanny.
Offline
I watched the movie last night as well, and I see what you mean, tonnaree. Although I must say, I was actually pretty engrossed in it while I watched it. Not a movie that I'd call fantastic, but it still captivated me, and I also thought the subject matter was really interesting. (And I do like Daniel Brühl and Moritz Bleibtreu, so that was a plus.)
I thought Benedict did a great job. Not sure just how genuine the accent sounded, I'm no expert on Aussie accents. I'm not quite sure why he gave Julian that lisp, though. Looking at Assange interviews, the real guy doesn't appear to have such a pronounced lisp. Well, I suppose it was just something that Ben wanted the character to be.
I thought that he excellently portrayed the aloofness of the character and the definite antisocial tendencies. He was just a little bit like Sherlock at times, wasn't he? The blatant disregard for socially awkward situations, the devil-may-care attitude that ruthlessly left emotional damage along the way -- all quite Sherlockian. But I never felt like I was watching Sherlock or any of Benedict's other characters, which certainly shows he's a very good actor.
The hair... well... not a fan. But also true to the real guy, so I'm not gonna complain.
What bothered me a little bit was the language issue. Chunks of the movie took part in Germany and Switzerland, and (thankfully) they picked German/Swiss actors for those parts. But to then have them speak English with each other just seemed... strange. I understand why they did it, because the film was first and foremost made for an English speaking audience, but Daniel and Anke would never speak English to each other if they were alone, nor would Daniel and his parents. I think I would have liked it better if they had done those scenes in German and subtitled them.
Visually, I really liked what they did, with the visualization of the submission platform and the captions and animations they used. I'm glad I watched the movie, even though I'm not sure I would watch it a second time.
SusiGo wrote:
Does the DVD have subtitles? I would prefer to buy it now to waiting for the German edition but subtitles would be nice.
The UK Blu-ray (which I assume is also the case for the DVD) has English subtitles for the hard of hearing. (Which I think doesn't only subtitle the dialogue but also has descriptions of what you can hear in the background.)
Le Bear Polar wrote:
I confess I have not watched TFE because, rather superficially, I'm worried I'll have the same adverse reaction as I had watched Cumberbatch in Atonement--that fear of that unnerving feeling of watching him so completely transformed into someone else. Terrible me, I know.
I haven't seen Atonement, so I can't compare the roles, but from what I've heard, I think you don't need to worry about Benedict in TFE. While Assange comes across as a bit of a cold-hearted,unsociable jerk sometimes, he's never despicable. Well, towards the end he gets quite ruthless, and there's definitely a moment where his motives are questionable, but you never want to deeply condemn him. They always portrayed him as human. Or at least that's how I felt.
Last edited by TeeJay (March 7, 2014 6:55 am)
Offline
I can only repeat:
Loved the film, loved Benedict and was quite puzzled at the anatagonism towards the piece...
Offline
besleybean wrote:
I can only repeat:
Loved the film, loved Benedict and was quite puzzled at the anatagonism towards the piece...
Agree wholehearted with you. To me it was one of the best pictures last year.
Offline
We interrupt this thread for a random black & white Cumbersange.
Offline
I hate it. I mean, Cumberbatch was really good, as usual, but the movie itself is a huge attack against Assange's personality. It is not focused on Wikileaks as an organization. Assange has been showed as a pervert, a manipulative guy (while Daniel Berg was the idealist one > HEY, YOUR WIFE IS WORKING FOR MICROSOFT NOW).
For example, during the flight scene, when Assange was spreading anon in the social network that Daniel Berg was a traitor? It's not a accurate fact : we don't know if it's true. Same thing for the girlfriend : actually Assange never met her in reality.
Plus, American government is showed as good guys. They don't talk about the poor Bradley Manning trial, how they discredited him, etc. I mean, of course we can disagree the choices of Wikileaks for revealing the cables. But the cables shows truth too.
So, eventually I think that the director screwed up, and it's too bad because it's a very interesting AND actual subject, and Cumberbatch and Brühl are both very good. When I watched the movie, I basically didn't know anything about Wikileaks, only the headlines in the newspapers, and despite that, I really felt it was a huge propaganda. The only good point is that immediately after that I fetched more informations about it and watched "Mediastan", which was much more better and more accurate (but still, very idealist).
Offline
Well I agree with Benedict, I really do not think it is that much of an attack on Assange.
Yes it's from one person's poit of view, but I think it tried to be even handed.
I think we can all recognize what Julian tried to achieve.
Offline
Up until Sherlock, The Fifth Estate was my favourite performance for BC.
I think he just inhabited Julian Assange in that role. I know JA had real problems with this movie and I understand his apprehensions totally. I also think that Cumberbatch did his utmost to portray him in an honest light.
But beyond that, when looking at just the performance - it was remarkable! There wasn't one untrue moment from him as an actor. And the role was very complicated (not unlike his current role in The Imitation Game).
His character is not an easy one to like on the surface. He is standoffish, mecurical and demanding. Not warm and cuddly at all. But because of BC's skill he is able to elicit empathy for his character (at least to me) and make his viewpoint accessable to the audience. That is no small task and it goes beyond the script. It depends on how the actor brings his subject to light and how much "humanism" he gets across when he says what has been written in the script. I really love it when an actor makes me feel, truly feel, for a character by the power of his performance and Cumberbatch does this with the impact of a tornado in The Fifth Estate.
I think the perceived politics of the film (which flopped at the boxoffice) kept BC from getting the widespread recognition that he deserved for this role. I am very, very happy that with The Imitation Game BC is finally getting another chance to show the mainstream movie going audiences a more complete picture of the true strength of his abilities on screen. They were given this opportunity in The Fifth Estate but they chose not to see it. Shame. This time it looks like they will finally take that chance and be rewarded with what fans of BC have known for some time - he is a force to be reckoned with!
-Val
Offline
I just saw this a couple of weeks ago. I was shocked when I saw Benedict's transformation. At first I thought he did too much of it with the speaking. It sounded too slow and too deliberate. But the problem with really good actors, as others have mentioned, is that you go to see a movie because you want to see the actor, but that's not what you see.
I didn't see Benedict. Very rarely. I saw someone else on the screen, and ten minutes into the movie I had (mostly) forgotten all about Benedict. He is a remarkable actor!
I liked the movie too. And I am glad Benedict fought the director to make the movie more nuanced than the director intended. The movie made me more interested in WikiLeaks than I have ever been.
So after the movie, I started looking up WikiLeaks and Julian Assange. I went on YouTube, wanting to hear how Assange spoke. At first I was a tad dissappointed, because Assange had less of an accent than Benedict, confirming my belief that he overdid it. But then Assange got excited and enganged - and his broader Aussie accent came out. And THEN I heard Benedict. Really cool.
Offline
Every time I see Julian, I just see Benedict now!
Offline
Good post Vhanja! I liked what you said about going to a movie to "see" an certain actor and yet with really good actors that isn't what you see... hopefully you see the character that they are portraying.
In a recent online interview I heard BC say that he likes to do roles that aren't "him" as a person. He likes to do characters that are not like his personality so that he can explore different realms. That's what keeps it interesting to him.
I really don't like it when I go to a movie and I keep seeing the real person behind the role. Acting is about tranformation and films are supposed to take you to another time, another place or another situation. If you just see "the actor" going through the lines then there is no transformation. Not for the audience or apparently for the actors.
There is always transformation when Cumberbatch plays in any of the projects I have seen him in IMO. He seems to make me forget all about his previous roles (and who he is in real life) when I an watching him in the "here and now" on the screen.
-Val
Offline
A sign he is the best of actors.
Offline
Yes, that is both good and bad - I love when actors are so good that even though you love them to bits, you more or less forget they are there (I did the same when I saw Martin Freeman in the last Hobbit-movie, and same now in Fargo).
besleybean - heh, funny thing. I didn't read much up on WikiLeaks when the stuff happened, I just read the headlines and saw Julian Assange pictured in the newspaper. And I always found Assange quite attractive. When I first Benedict as Assange, I actually found him less handsome then Assange himself (even though Benedict himself is more handsome than most).
But as I got into the movie and got used to his looks - darn, he was hot with that white hair!
Last edited by Vhanja (December 23, 2014 7:18 pm)