Offline
I'm sure they play on it. They know what people like, as Irene might say.
If I was shipping Sherlock and John, I'm not even sure that I would like to see it happen in the show, because it couldn't live up to years of fantasy, could it?
I don't ship them, but I'm not sure how much I want to see Sherlock in any sexual relationship. I have a horrible fear that they would make him comically awkward to play on the virgin thing. Please, no. Or that in some other way, it wouldn't live up to my expectations. I'm so glad that we saw loads of sexual tension between Sherlock and Irene, but no actual sex.
Offline
Personally I could have done without the tension, but that's how it was both written and played.
Offline
Johnlock need to kiss
Offline
I don't think so and I don't think we'll see it anyway...not unless somebody is dying or something..
Offline
A convincing demonstration of the difference between bromance and … well.
Offline
I could imagine some viewing the 2 shows would see it the other way around.
I still see bromance.
Incidentally, if Turk's female partner is shown...why isn't Mary?
Well, better than she is.
Last edited by besleybean (September 12, 2014 9:42 pm)
Offline
I don't actually see Sherlock or John ever being like that with their friends. They don't tend to be demonstrative in that way. (See Sherlock's relationship with LeStrade for an example).
(I don't ship Turk and JD either!)
Offline
Actually, I'm not quite sure to which extent you can really compare a comedy series and a drama series. Both genres work on completely different levels, so I suppose the relationships works on different levels, too.
Nevertheless, I mostly see goofiness going on between Turk and JD. Sherlock and John though... there is something very different going on between those two.
Offline
What exactly do you think is going on between them?
Offline
Goofiness, Solar, right - essential part of bromance.
Last edited by Harriet (September 12, 2014 10:31 pm)
Offline
besleybean wrote:
What exactly do you think is going on between them?
Unresloved sexual tension.
*crawls back to corner*
Offline
You see, I don't really see it there. I just don't. I can make myself see it, so I do think it's possible to see it and you're not all just making it up, but it doesn't come naturally. I just don't think their relationship is sexual.
Also, I don't think John would have gone ahead with the wedding if his love for Sherlock was that sort of love, but I suppose that's open to debate.
The word "bromance" doesn't seem to be popular. I wish there was a better one! I think of them as having a romantic friendship, but that's not a very good definition either. It's a special friendship, one that crosses the boundaries of an ordinary friendship (in things like how much they need each other, how much they protect each other, how central they are to each other's lives), but not the sexual boundaries.
Again, there's Sherlock/LeStrade for a more ordinary friendship, and Sherlock/Irene for a UST relationship. Sherlock/John is something different.
Offline
It seems odd that nobody can actially spell out what they mean.
I know we did start on this conversation once before, but I still wonder what people actually have on their minds other than what we are being shown.
I mean you know seriously, the whole point of the 1st hug, was that it wa the 1st hug between them...
Kind of loses impact if people think they are waking around hand in hand, arrms around each other, kissiing or snuggling at other times...
What remains in the truth.
We are not bieng shown these things for a reason...they ain't happening and nothing to suggest they well...
And on a similar vein.
It's no use people;acting like Mary didn't happen.
She did and at the moment is very much in the picture and we are clearly seeing the relaltionship there.
And it wouldn't even matter if it turns out John didn't really love Mary.
Point is, he's only ever been with women...
Last edited by besleybean (September 13, 2014 7:46 am)
Offline
On the other hand, sometimes I feel that it becomes too much of a case of John/Sherlock versus John/Mary. Because clearly John/Sherlock is the central pairing of the show (whether you think it's sexual or not), and Mary is part of the story. Even in the book, she's part of a story - she's a client, who comes out with them. - and then (I believe, not having read all the stories), she's barely mentioned, and presumably dies, when she's no longer part of the story. So I don't think you can compare those relationships. It doesn't matter how much John might love Mary, she's not going to be central (I hope!), and it's not going to be a John/Mary love story (I hope!).
But I suppose Mary does confirm John's heterosexuality, if any confirmation was needed. (I think it's pretty much established from the beginning).
Offline
Besleybean, nobody is acting like Mary did not happen. On the contrary. This is just not true. The thing is just that the relationship between John and Mary seems very pale compared to the one between Sherlock and John. I mean, we are shown John four weeks after his marriage dreaming of Sherlock, running to the door, getting very disappointed at seeing his neighbour there. Saying he has not seen Sherlock for ages (romantic exaggeration). Getting a biting reply from his wife. Which hints at the fact that he may have been talking too much about Sherlock. Four weeks, this includes the honeymoon. And Mary seems to be really pissed. Sorry, but no one can make me believe that this is a happy heterosexual relationship on John's side.
Offline
But John just misses his best friend, Susi, and the avdenture and the danger his best friend always provides.
I'm not going into this debate again. I already said several times what I see when I see Sherlock and John and what their relationship means to me. But it certainly doesn't mean to me that they're running around holding hands when we don't seem, or that they're having hot sex in the shower when we don't see them.
Offline
Sorry, Solar, it seems I got that wrong.
But - we see him in his bedroom with Mary three times - once laying awake because of Sherlock, once talking with her about Sherlock (and shaving), once dreaming of Sherlock. But surely this is just a joke.
I agree. I want just one thing - the both of them together, in Baker Street, without a third person lurking in their midst or in the background. And the best and easiest way to realise this seems quite obvious to me.
Offline
Well, what is your definition of bromance then, besley? And are Turk and JD bros or not?
Last edited by Harriet (September 13, 2014 9:43 am)
Offline
Have any of you seen a bromance in real life? Between adults men, not only students or teens?
Because i didn't, so i could take my definition of bromance only from films and books, which is not to say that i can bring an universal truth ...
I think each of us is let to see what we see in these series, it has its ambiguity and at this moment each version might be true.
Offline
I don't really know what bromance is, I've never heard that term before I joined this fandom.
Anyway, let's face the fact that it's not always possible to find a clear definition for every relationship. And let's also face that relationships in "Sherlock" are usually a bit... unusual and dysfunctional. Lestrade and his wife, Mrs. Hudson and her husband, Molly and Tom (and let's not forget her crush on Sherlock), John and his women (and I'm including Mary here!), and also Sherlock's relationship to Mycroft and their relationship to their parents. It's all a bit not soo good, if you ask me.
The relationship between Sherlock and John is the one that stands out, and yes, that's because the show is about the two of them. But I see more than just a relationship that is central to the show. It's not always healthy, but then again look at the hurt and pain and loss they each feel when the other one is not around. For me that's pure love.