Ozma wrote:

I am well and truly convinced that the preview they set up was of a fake episode.

Either that, or they locked us all in a room and filled with an invisible volatile drug that made us all see things.

These people are good.

Is it really possible that they would do that? Doesn't make any sense  ...but it does confirm the fact that the fandom appears to love conspiracy theories! XD 
 

Ozma wrote:

no, seriously, that one is seriously gone. Moffat wasn't lying about that.

I'm so glad I didn't write it down.

SilverMoonDragonB wrote:

Ozma wrote:

SilverMoonDragonB wrote:

Is it really possible that they would do that? Doesn't make any sense  ...but it does confirm the fact that the fandom appears to love conspiracy theories! XD 
 

yes. and they they put the fake one on the dvd as special content, like they did with the unaired pilot

I would be a great idea I think. Or maybe they just shot 2 different endings.

So, they would film an entire fake episode, air it, just to mess with us...? Even the Mofftiss can't be THAT crazy 

Maybe I just gave them an idea.

I wouldn't put it past them. lol

I love how Sherlock is always right: we see, but we don't observe....

certainly this has been true for this whole series. For the majority of the fans, at least.

Everything has always been right there for us to see

Even right now. Mark and Sue are giving you everything you need to know.

Last edited by Ozma (January 10, 2014 4:13 pm)

Ozma wrote:

Even right now. Mark and Sue are giving you everything you need to know.

Gah! All this is driving me barmy Dx ...and I've even using british slang now 

I just want to see the episode and get a headstart on whatever heartbreak is coming our way...
 

Kerkerian wrote:

Ozma wrote:

Even right now. Mark and Sue are giving you everything you need to know.

I wish I had Sherlock's deduction skills.

Did you see my PM, by the way?

Guh, yes, sorry, just seen it now.

It's seriously, right there. Everything.

Ozma wrote:

I love how Sherlock is always right: we see, but we don't observe....

certainly this has been true for this whole series. For the majority of the fans, at least.

Everything has always been right there for us to see

Aarg, Ozma, you have me right back in conspiracy mode. Again! Something we should have seen or heard but didn't. Probably because in context it also meant something else. And whatever that something is, we don't know what it is supposed to mean. That's two unknowns on either side of the equation, dear, impossible to solve. 

There must be clues about Mary: we know the 'liar' deduction, she knows CAM, CAM threatened her by trying to kill her boyfriend. And there's Mycroft's cryptic message about redbeard, and despite heavy theorising, we still don't really know what it means. 

Major character death: there aren't so many major characters to kill. Doubt they'd kill Sherlock again, it's not him. John can be killed, though somehow would need to be brought back to life. Mycroft, Mary, Molly, Lestrade, mrs Hudson, all the other ones can be killed without bringing them back.

I think I would be most devastated if it's Mycroft. It's not entirely impossible; even though he doesn't die in the canon, he's hardly ever present and I can imagine that he's an annoying character to write, too powerful to create realistic conflict. But killing Mycroft.... noooooo! Mary is the most obvious choice, but she's not a very big character. Maybe they do the unthinkable and kill John, would be convenient with scheduling. 

What did Sue tweet, did anyone catch that?
 

Ozma wrote:

Same as Mark (sorry, wanted to embed the tweet but it obvs didn't work!

Sherlock - His Last Vow. Sometimes somebody has to die. Sunday BBC1, 8.30. #sherlocklives

What does that even mean?!  Do they mean someone good? Someone bad? I don't want any of our beloved characters to die! *sniffles*
 

Just as a note:

We have stopped talking spoilers in the chat now.  People are not adhering to the wishes of those who are giving them, so please don't come in asking for them.  Thanks!