Offline
When I read the posts here, I want so badly to see it too...
Please share all the details when you've seen it
Offline
Of course we will.
Offline
This Is The Phantom Lady wrote:
I don't know if this is a spoilerish thing... but does anyone know how long the show will take, and if there will be breaks?
I hope it lasts as long as possible!! ... but due to my health I would like to know this...
EDIT: Sorry I just found it myself... 3 hours with a 20 minute intival... holy crepe.
There will certainly be a break, maybe even two. Don't get too nervous :-)!
Offline
Is it real?
EDIT: Forget it. Right head but wrong body.
Last edited by gently69 (August 4, 2015 7:19 am)
Offline
Erm, ...how would you know about his body, may I ask?
Offline
This is the real thing: Rory Kinnear as Hamlet.
Offline
mrshouse wrote:
Erm, ...how would you know about his body, may I ask?
LOL... you want to know???
Well, unfortunately only as Solar already posted...
Offline
I have to say though that I probably would have liked that look very much.
Offline
Yes. Plus curls and sideburns.
Offline
Hopefully he doesn't go to the hairdresser before the play starts... tomorrow... OMG!!!
Offline
A positive review in the Telegraph this morning, and lots of spoiler pictures (and a 5 star review) in the Daily Mail
Last edited by Liberty (August 6, 2015 7:08 am)
Offline
Not to sound too arrogant but I expect 100% positive reviews. It's Benedict Cumberbatch we are talking about.
In the interval someone tweeted about a confetti cannon, should I be worried?!
Offline
Giddy as a school girl this monring with all the news. Very excited to finally hear about stageing and costumes. I like that they are mixing things up. Shakespeare's works are so open to experimentation.
And I must say, in this one photo, Benedict's tight white fencing jacket accents certain areas of his anatomy quite fetchingingly. Or to put it more simply, that ass.
Offline
Yes, tonnaree, and super annoying to read about some "press" breaking the etiquettes as not to report about a first preview in all depths and getting snobby about the theatre goers...
Offline
mrshouse wrote:
Yes, tonnaree, and super annoying to read about some "press" breaking the etiquettes as not to report about a first preview in all depths and getting snobby about the theatre goers...
Yes that makes me angry too. They mainly talk about how obsessed and silly the fans are. God I knew when I first heard the word Cumberbitches, when I was watching Ben on Chatty Man 3 years ago, it would be generalised.
Offline
Ivy wrote:
Not to sound too arrogant but I expect 100% positive reviews. It's Benedict Cumberbatch we are talking about.
I know, but I worried a little that he might be criticised just because he's Benedict Cumberbatch (that it might be fashionable to criticise him, and the Daily Mail can sometimes be a bit catty). I did come across a negative review, but didn't read it.
Offline
Well, for pretty much anything (even if it's fantastic), there's always someone who has something negative to say. It's pretty much impossible that everyone will like it, that every critic will like it. It can just as easily go the other way, there's always someone who likes something that's very bad.
Offline
Don´t be concerned about the things written in what is practically a tabloid. They simply have to make a cheap sensation of everything they write of.
Offline
I seem to disagree with most Daily Mail opinions, so wouldn't have been surprised at a negative review (in fact it was the opposite)!. The negative review was actually in The Times (but they've been criticised for it too). I didn't even think it was worth mentioning, except that it seemed to be unexpected. I'm happy to wait and see for myself - I will be incredibly surprised if I don't love it.
Last edited by Liberty (August 6, 2015 8:48 pm)
Offline
I too intend to at least see the screened version - no matter about the negative or positive reviews.