Reichenbach Theories » How does he get out of the Reichenback fall in the canon? » March 27, 2013 4:03 pm |
"Not that it was hard considering there were no witnesses to his "dying"."
There was to the contrary though (retrofitted), there was Colonel Sebastian Moran, he saw Holmes escape and shot him.
The reason Holmes did go into such complete hiding for three years was that Moran knew he was still alive. Presumably the same applies here.
I always thought that was a serious plot hole from ACD. The criminal underworld knows of Holmes escape, presumably, or at least the Moriaty in waiting does. And yet Holmes best and only friend and colleague never gets any word of it. He's never tortured for information, either about Holmes wherabouts or even any info he has from the past that might shed light. Always was a bit hmm there (I know in reality its a fudge by ACD anyway). Not only that but he lives a happy and quiet life despite being known to have been friends withand in on the cases of the sworn enemy of the most ruthless and dangerous man in Europe. I guess it was a gentler time ;-)
Reichenbach Theories » unless...what if the clue IS the speed of the fall? » March 27, 2013 4:01 pm |
I am definately reading too much into this I suspect . I doubt the writers sat around calculating the physics of the thing. I doubt they were saying "but after 7 seconds he'd reach terminal velocity anyway.". I bet they just said, "ok lets film it so you can't see he falls into a truck of laundry and rolls off.". But you know, I can hope
Reichenbach Theories » Go on then...what are your theories? » March 27, 2013 3:54 pm |
Oh the cyclist yeah, thats interesing. He comes from behind John. I've lost my bearings by this point but I'm not actually sure there is even a road there for him to come from. (fair enough, could be poetic license). He seems to be marking John, cycling slowly and watching him-and then manages to cycle into him and cycle off. That's not an accident. The cyclist also slows, kind of checking John isn't badly hurt, kind of looking back, then off he goes. The cyclist (I think he's male) is also very hard to identify-he has a hat on which covers pretty much all his face-but the bits we see, the quite distinctive nose and the pale skin, look remarkably like Sherlock (the Solitary Cyclist even). But how could he do that?
Also re the chalked rectangle. He falls and then rolls meaning that he falls into the rectangle and rolls out. (see I think this is the Jonathan Creek.trampoline theory myself ;-) )
My theory is that he somehow decelerated his fall, although I don't know how. His injuries, the speed at whcih he hits the ground, not to mention the actual time taken for the fall support this but there's a bit of a problem because he actually doesn't seem to do anything that might slow his fall ;-).
There is an additional issue with all these theories also. They kind of rely on half of Barts hospital being in on Sherlock's plan. Which given his plan was to pretend to fake his own death and Moriaty's henchpeople have spies everywhere as we know...maybe not cool.
(I do LOVE all the speculation here. Internet hive mind at its best :-) )
Reichenbach Theories » Right so the truck theory... » March 27, 2013 3:43 pm |
Just rewatched the clip
See I'm not sure that the truck there when he falls. I don't think we can exactly tell but I'm not sure, just going on the angle of filming, but more importantly, if you watch it closely he falls onto the pavement. He has to, I know that pavement-its really pretty wide. You couldn't fall into the road unless you really launched yourself off the top of the building and Sherlock didn't. Also his trajectory is straight.
Goodness they have given us a lot of fun with this haven't they?
Reichenbach Theories » unless...what if the clue IS the speed of the fall? » March 27, 2013 3:28 pm |
Well I am inclined to agree its dramatic effect more than anything.A two second fall would not be nearly as suspenseful. OTOH I thought I'd better post this because if it turned out that this was what it was-and I was at least partly right-I would absolutely kick mysefl.
Andy-"A parachute is a bit stupid idea. There was not enough time for the parachute to open and help Sherlock slow down and then disappear quickly enough not to be seen by John.".
Well obviously not an actual parachute, I mean something that acted as a parachute, parachute as a general noun iyswim but I could have been clearer. There is clearly no parachute opening in the scene. Its rather that he might be doing something to increase the drag.
I've looked at the stills again and there is nothing that looks like a parachute except one thing-his coat is consistently flapping in an odd way above him. But I really can't see anything there to increase drag. And if you were falling 70 feet your coat might well flap a bit.
I've also noticed something else. We see his body falling right up to the point where he is nearly past the first floor. Meaning we are looking at only around fifteen feet or so unaccounted for even if he miraculously falls onto a truck.
One small thing-he doesn't seem that badly injured given the height he's fallen from (and the fact he's fallen onto his face). In fact he seems to move over directly after the fall. His limbs don't seem obviously broken.
I dunno, maybe the one in Jonathan Creek is the best "we dug out the pavement in Whitechapel Road to a depth of fifteen feet and added a concealed trampoline". Or maybe the Doctor was involved.
Or maybe he just had a concealed bungee wire or something.
I don't think moving his limbs would slow him down that much-actually keeping them still but spread out might be his best bet-but you never know, it could be baritsu or something ;-)
Reichenbach Theories » Right so the truck theory... » March 27, 2013 12:21 pm |
No I don' think there is a cut, there is just an angle change. We change from the fall to a vantage point with the truck taking up most of the right hand side of the frame.
More than anything, that's what is throwing me. I don't think our eyes leave Sherlock, its just that the angle changes. There isn't really time for him to roll off and onto a truck, even if the truck was actually in his flight path,which it isn't.
Reading the theories I'd assumed there was a cut but I just went back and rewatched (though its a youtube clip, don't think it looks edited though) and there isn't one.
ETA Unless we are looking at some kind of Seussian crane contraption of course and that was no ordinary rubbish truck
Reichenbach Theories » unless...what if the clue IS the speed of the fall? » March 27, 2013 12:11 pm |
;-) I am guessing it won't be this either but I do like the theory
I'll try and explain again, very simply.
He fell at a quarter the speed he should have. This is not really something controversial. Its based on the idea that all objects fall at the same speed, meaning that if you know how far off the ground he is to start with you can work out how fast he hits the ground. Its physics at a level we are taught at around age 15 in the UK.
He does fall much too slowly. The question is, why? Is it for dramatic convenience (I accept yes, probably). Or is it actually a plot point? In other words, do we, and John, see but not observe?
The only two things likely to slow down an object in freefall are 1. something creating air resistance, like a parachute, or b. something pushing the other way, like a jetpack.
TBH there is a massive hole in this which is where on earth he got a parachute (or a jetpack). That would have to have been planted somehow earlier and I can't remember it being. Although....the sheet? But then he is on the lam, and probably didn't have a sheet to hand.
Reichenbach Theories » How does he get out of the Reichenback fall in the canon? » March 27, 2013 11:08 am |
But his possession, I presume, in the event of his death?
I really get the impression from that story-and, tbh, from the show-that Sherlock/ Holmes expects to die. He has a lucky escape and uses his wits to make the most of it.
Reichenbach Theories » unless...what if the clue IS the speed of the fall? » March 27, 2013 11:06 am |
ETA To put it simply: he falls far, far slower than he should. Far, far slower.
And its very, very easy to calculate how fast he should have fallen.
ok in my post further down I noted that there is a discrepancy between how fast he should have been falling, given the height of the building, and how fast he actually does fall.
Basically he takes 8 seconds to fall a distance that, in freefall, would have taken him more like 2 seconds.
his makes a big difference to the speed. If he'd fallen 70 feet in 8 seconds, that is not too fast. Its about 3 metres per second or around 6 1/2 miles an hour. I'd say that's totally survivable. He'd probably be semi-conscious and the blood could well be real but so long as he was whisked away (and I don't think what Watson does is really taking his pulse) it would be fine. We know that the ordierlies must have been in league with someone anyway because no emergency services people would ever move a body that had fallen that distance without a neck brace.
He is also nearly upright and flailing for most of the fall, despite falling face first. As I understand it, if you fall face first you land face first. Freefall doesn't give you a chance to turn really.
The latter could simply be that I presume that the actor had a wire attatched to him which meant he was uprightish. Or it could be part of the clue.
Basically, one option is that something caused him to slow down a lot on that fall. Something acted like a parachute to really slow his fall. Something we can't see but which must have been planted earlier in the episode...(I want to say his coat but, awesome as it is, I don't think it would create quite enough air resistance. How cool would it be though if it was his coat!)
Ok I know that this is probably just cartoon physics going on. The fall needed to take 8 seconds for the drama to occur. But I love the idea that physics rescued Sherlock and it woudl not be the first time he'd
Reichenbach Theories » How does he get out of the Reichenback fall in the canon? » March 27, 2013 10:13 am |
Here's a link to the pdf of the Empty House
(that doesn't count as a spoiler I assume?)
I don't know how helpful it is. I'd say that in Sherlock, the fall is basically a psychological one and so this might be more about telling us how he played Moriaty and how he will rebuild his reputation. But still, interesting.
Another important point here-he didn't plan his escape. He expected to die with Moriaty. It just turned out he was better at fighting than he thought. He didn't collude ahead of time with Mycroft, rather contacting him after.
(also apologies for the typo in the title-that's my spellchecker being odd)
Reichenbach Theories » Right so the truck theory... » March 27, 2013 9:38 am |
ok more geekery here now from me. If I get a chance I'll come back and check this with an actual calculator. I'm terrible for converting badly feet to mph and metres and so on-using mixed measurement systems (owing to my age!) so I might have made a mistake in there.
I've happened upon an interview which said that the distance fallen was actually around 70 feet, less than I thought, which would make the speed on impact closer to 40 mph-which I understand is probably dead but not so definately and that anything to cushion the impact might actually make a difference.
Ok here is the problem. I've just rewatched the video on youtube and it has him falling for 8 seconds. Which means, unless I've made a big mistake (we're out of coffee-never good!) he hits the ground at around 250 feet per second which is something like 180 miles an hour. I don't think pillows will help him survivie this.
The trouble I'm having -that I've always had - is that I know Barts and it is a really tall building. I mean every Londoner knows Barts, so its not rarified, specialist knowledge or anything. I honestly don't think the screenshots really capture this-yes its three or four stories high but they are high stories. But to be fair I'm looking at another photo now and there's a phone box in it and assuming that a phone box is about 10 ft high that makes the particular part of Barts he jumped from around 70 ft meaning that the impact speed was about 40 mph.
There is an issue with the pavement and the truck too. You don't really get a sense of this I think in the show but actually, its a really wide pavement and I'm not sure how Sherlock could have changed his trajectory midfall anyway. Unless he had a rocket booster or something ;-)
Oh dear. Before I drown in a swamp of geekery (physics and Londonalia!) I think I'd better go and do some work. And it does seem possible to me that when the writing team laid out their clues as to his survival they weren't expect
Reichenbach Theories » Right so the truck theory... » March 27, 2013 9:24 am |
(which is my favourite for simplicity)
still seems to me to have two enormous flaws
First off, we see a body landing. We see Sherlock (or someone alive who looks quite amazingly like him) falling from the roof and directly after we see a body fall.
All objects fall at the same speed, so its not really feasible that someone else pushed another body off the roof, and I think the body falls too fast to have fallen from the truck and too far from Barts and too straight for Molly to have thrown it out of the morgue window or anything.
Second, ok even if there was a soft landing, a rubbish truck literally full of pillows and suchlike, I make it, based on how tall the building seems to be (did work experience at Barts years ago-it is quite tall) and also how long he seems to fall for that his speed on impact would be something like 70mph. Now that is pretty fast. If you were driving a car at 70mph and it crashed at 70mph (as opposed to you braking) then you would, I think, be fairly screwed regardless of whether you'd crashed into a soft wall or not. You probably would not be in a state to play dead at that point.
The only possibility I can think of is that Sherlock actually took some kind of muscle relaxant directly prior to the fall. This would make him less likely to have been injured and would be seeming to be dead anyway. But a. he is awake and conscious when he falls (flailing limbs-thats a live person) and b. this would have to have been planted earlier somehow and I can't think of where it would have been.
So I dunno, are they going to cartoon physics us here maybe?
Series Three Suggestions & Ideas » How will John react when he finds out Sherlock isn't dead? » March 27, 2013 9:04 am |
Actually though-assuming we are looking at a very late 2013/ 2014 air date, aren't we probably looking at nearly three years anyway? Or does it just feel that way? Near enough anyway.
Was it actually three years in canon? ACD was a bit random with dates anyway at times.
Do you know what my hunch is about that episode? That it will be like the first Dr Who after he reunites with Donna. They spend a whole episode nearly finding each other and not quite. I think this will have some intrugue and adventure for John and we'll also see his relationship with his wife as completely separate and developed through the episode. It will be a mature relationship, which is fitting since they may have spent more years togther now than John and Sherlock . We'll get, basically, a healed, family man John who occasionally, sentimentally, might think of his exciting past but as something done and gone. And then a weird or unusual series of murders or something starts up and he gets dragged in somehow and Sherlock comes along and saves the day. And then what happens is anyone's guess.
Oh and then she has to die I guess because that is basically what Mary Morsten is there for, to take John away from Sherlock for a bit, grow up up a little, and then hand him back when stories need to be told.
Reichenbach Theories » This girl has come very close, I believe. » March 26, 2013 2:31 pm |
haha yes you are right. Perhaps the maths professors of the Victorian era were our 21c kids tv presenters ;-) .
I really like the theory that Richard Brook is his real identity too actually
I've never really liked the Carl Powers thing, the idea that for all his detective life, since Sherlock was, what, 13? Moriaty has been tracking him and behind everything. Bearing in mind that they must be about the same age with Moriaty looking, if anything, slightly younger. Why did he actually take Carl Powers shoes? Did they have any relevance to the story or are we meant to believe that the, presumably thirteen year old Moriaty stole them in order to lay clues for a kid he hadn't even, we assume, at this point, met, twenty years down the line? And did we ever get an explaination of why he took the shoes anyway?
(oh please god do not let Sherlock and Jim turn out to have been classmates. Unlikely, I hope-Jim has a strong Irish accent and Sherlock seems southern English/boarding school/old money. Just too Young Sherlock Holmes I think. Although there is a comedic potential here with Sherlock having been in the same class as Jim for his entire school career without noticing, because he is so amazingly socially rubbish)
Reichenbach Theories » This girl has come very close, I believe. » March 26, 2013 1:39 am |
hmmmm
certainly interesting. I really like the theory
What I'm hesitating over is that the writers don't really depart far from the canon. They play with it and let it inform their work and deconstruct it and turn it inside out but at the end of the day, everything can be traced back to the canon or if not the canon, a side nod to the fanfic/spin offs.
I do wonder if she's just exposing mahoosive plot holes (like, yeah, Moriaty being a long term actor, I wondered about that too. Though one thing I wondered-its not clear whether he has just joined the cast of the long running show. Being an actor is actually a potentially perfect cover for Moriaty because he can claim to have been trying to get jobs for years.
The funny name "like the fairy tale" I just thought was "Grimm" or something. I didn't see it as that significant. Maybe I see but do not observe.
Character Analysis » POLL: Favourite character after Sherlock & John - Take 2 » March 26, 2013 1:06 am |
Mycroft is just such an excellent character and what they've done with the relationship between the two brothers is just inspired. Anyone who has ever had a sibling, older or younger can relate to that one, the bratty little brother who won't come into line or the bossy older brother who thinks he knows best. Awesome.
But Lestrade is great too. I love this series because while they've taken ACD as a starting point they've also kind of taken into account his Victorian discretion and the way he wrote and the fact that Watson wasn't always a reliable narrator with his hero worship of Holmes. This idea of Lestrade, who has risen to the top of his profession, as an uncharasmatic, stupid bungler has to be about as inaccurate in fact as the idea of Watson, who did manage to complete medical school, as an idiot and a buffoon. And so is Mrs Hudson though she's exactly as she should be really.
Series Three Suggestions & Ideas » How will John react when he finds out Sherlock isn't dead? » March 26, 2013 12:53 am |
I wonder if there might actually be no violence, nothing save perhaps these terrible swear words
I mean yes they might go for this but I think it would be interesting to see something else: that rather than spent two years moping and venturing out only to see his therapist, he will have done something far more unsettling to Holmes which is to have grieved, raged and then moved on. If they follow the books, he might even have settled down with some nice young woman called Mary.
I tend to see the show as in some ways John's journey. Because the show kind of focusses on Sherlock and his foibles -he's the title character-I think its easy not to see how deeply not perfect, how deeply screwed up and damaged John actually is. This is a man who is fine after shooting someone, who-I think we kind of realise in aSIB-has killed before (I think Sherlock-and our-assumption initially in SiP is that this was his first killing, perhaps overcome by the situation-whereas actually, he is calm and its premeditated). . He's someone who will defend to the hilt honesty and justice and all the rest but get on the wrong side or push him too far and he will snap. Someone who carries a concealed, loaded, weapon around London and shoots with it. Someone who can kind of be ok with a friend drugging him and scaring the life out of him in HOTB - I don't know why but I guess it might be because he has an adrenaline thing going on. People who carry loaded weapons around and punch their friends in the face, even with provocation, are actually not balanced people, not in 21c London. He's an adrenaline junkie still recovering/processing PTSS who starts the series with a longing shot of a gun. And through the two series he gets better, gradually, to the point where, even in the scene with the therapist at the end he is still more functional, less defensive, for his two years or so with Sherlock than he was at the start.
So I wonder if, after Sherlock's "death", he actually does manag
Other Adaptations » Young Sherlock Holmes to get re-released » March 24, 2013 6:55 pm |
Oh that was a weird film. Just everything about it. Particularly loved the idea that they met as teenagers and then presumably forgot about each other. And also that there was a huge secret Egyptian temple killing people in the middle of London.
Other Adaptations » Remembering Jeremy Brett » March 24, 2013 6:50 pm |
" It was hard watching them at the end"
I agree with this so much. I grew up with him as the definitive Holmes and reading what happened to him and the cost to him of filming in the end is actually quite heartbreaking, to the extent that I don't think I could watch the later episodes nowadays.
Its such a hard one, I have such great memories of watching the earlier series but to watch a man disintergrate like that in front of the cameras...so hard.
In some ways that's why I like the new Sherlock a lot more. Its far more deconstructed, far less about setting up a hero, far more human. I find it very hard to watch the Jeremy Brett years while knowing the truth about what was going on behind the scenes.
General Sherlock Discussion » POLL: Would you watch Sherlock if ........ » March 24, 2013 6:36 pm |
"I don't think the old guys wore crinolines very often. "
no I guess it would be a Sunday best thing.