veecee wrote:
Mofftiss laughingly mention it in the commentary following the Season 3 episodes (at least in the US). Then it cuts to some screaming fans outside 221B. Cute.
For the record, I think George Clooney is superattractive, but in a more conventional way.
I rarely swear but this article sounds like a complete „bullshit“ to me.
As it happens, BBC produced some Sherlock Holmes adaptations and films before „Sherlock“. The first one was an adaptation of „Hound of Baskervilles“ (2002) starring Rixard Roxburgh:
The second one was an uncanonical story „The Case of Silk Stocking“ (2004) with Rupert Everett in the main role:
No offence to both actors, but the way they portrayed Sherlock Holmes was as unsexy as it could be, they both looked gloomy, sullen, apathetic and unatractive in those productions.
Yet no BBC executive seemed to care about such things at the time, because, honestly, Sherlock Holmes was no Adonis in canon and there was no need to portray him as such.
Then enters Benedict Cumberbatch and suddenly everybody is sooo concerned about how Sherlock is supposed to be sexy.
That only happens because Benedict Cumberbatch single-handedly made that fictional character sexy, energetic and charismatic (possesing those qualities in spades). If another boring bloke like the two mentioned above was cast as Sherlock, no one would bother to point out if he was sexy or not.
Last edited by nakahara (March 6, 2014 12:22 pm)
-----------------------------------
I cannot live without brainwork. What else is there to live for? Stand at the window there. Was there ever such a dreary, dismal, unprofitable world? See how the yellow fog swirls down the street and drifts across the dun-coloured houses. What could be more hopelessly prosaic and material? What is the use of having powers, Doctor, when one has no field upon which to exert them?