BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



June 7, 2012 7:27 am  #41


Re: The misidentification.

Yes I am saying that the body wasn't killed necessarily on Xmas eve.

So you believe that presumably Irene was alive right up till the time Sherlock opened the gift?

She may have organised the gift to 'arrive' somehow on his mantelpiece sometime before that. The story could have been that she left it with Kate & a note saying "if I am not back by such & such a time, organise to get this onto Sherlock's mantelpiece."

One thing I am curious about at this point in time. I have a vague recollection of discussing this ages ago but cannot remember now so will ask here again.

Sherlock recieves a text from Irene (the ahhh tone) , reads it, picks up the gift & takes it to his room; opens it & finds her phone.
So what phone did she use to send the text? Wouldn't she need her own phone so that her special tone was heard?
Forgive me if I am confused here, but isn't that wrong?


I'll set up a thread for this problem.


____________________________________________________________________________________________
Also, please note that sentences can also end in full stops. The exclamation mark can be overused.
Sherlock Holmes 28 March 13:08

Mycroft’s popularity doesn’t surprise me at all. He is, after all, incredibly beautiful, clever and well-dressed. And beautiful. Did I mention that?
--Mark Gatiss

"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I’m not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
Robert McCloskey
 

June 7, 2012 8:22 am  #42


Re: The misidentification.

kazza474 wrote:

No, you are making it more complicated than it needs to be.

But then of course if you believe he was 'smitten' by her and wanted to seek revenge for some reason I suppose THEN you would ask 'why didn't he investigate deeper?'

Ah, I think I've realised one of the points at which we're not connecting. Looking back, I probably haven't explained properly that when I'm thinking about the body saga I'm trying to think from the point of Irene planning this situation. (I've probably lost track of this at times during the discussion too - sorry - again, I blame this cold.) After all, it is her plan. So, it doesn't really matter what you or I think about what's going on in Sherlock's head (and I actually think our views are pretty close), but what Irene thinks. Her views of what Sherlock and everyone else thinks of her are what determines which details she thinks are important and which things she doesn't need to worry about. What parts of the story, if any, need to be able to stand up to scrutiny.

So, I suppose the first question really is: what is Irene trying to achieve? She says "I needed to disappear" but Mycroft thinks it was all to string Sherlock along:
MYCROFT: That’s all it takes: one lonely naïve man desperate to show off, and a woman clever enough to make him feel special.
SHERLOCK: Hmm. You should screen your defence people more carefully.
MYCROFT: I’m not talking about the MOD man, Sherlock; I’m talking about you.
MYCROFT: The damsel in distress. In the end, are you really so obvious? Because this was textbook: the promise of love, the pain of loss, the joy of redemption; then give him a puzzle ... and watch him dance.

(with thanks to Ariane DeVere)
So, which of these was she really trying to achieve? Or was it something else entirely?

And then, Irene's been working pretty hard to attract Sherlock's attention and interest. Does she think she's had any success? Or does his lack of response to her texts convince her he's disinterested?

Any combination of answers to the above questions leads to a different set of things she needs to consider in setting up the body and the story around it.

     Thread Starter
 

June 7, 2012 8:29 am  #43


Re: The misidentification.

kazza474 wrote:

One thing I am curious about at this point in time. I have a vague recollection of discussing this ages ago but cannot remember now so will ask here again.

Sherlock recieves a text from Irene (the ahhh tone) , reads it, picks up the gift & takes it to his room; opens it & finds her phone.
So what phone did she use to send the text? Wouldn't she need her own phone so that her special tone was heard?
Forgive me if I am confused here, but isn't that wrong?


I'll set up a thread for this problem.

I think this is the "two phone" problem. She sent him the "camera phone" (which had all uplink and connection disabled) but would have used her normal phone to send the text. Likewise when Sherlock interprets the email, Sherlock is still holding the camera phone when she uses her normal phone (hidden behind her back) to text the details to Moriarty.

Last edited by Aurora (June 7, 2012 8:31 am)

     Thread Starter
 

June 7, 2012 8:32 am  #44


Re: The misidentification.

May I just interject for a moment to say this:

To others reading this, it may have appeared that the 2 of us were just at loggerheads over what this & that means, but I know from my end and I believe Aurora's end, we're nutting out some interesting things here. It's sometimes hard to say exactly what you are thinking; words just don't 'do it' ; in conversation you'd hear my voice raise, or sound inquisitive. If we were face to face, this wouldn't take so long, lol!

We're finding some avenues yet to be explored I think.


____________________________________________________________________________________________
Also, please note that sentences can also end in full stops. The exclamation mark can be overused.
Sherlock Holmes 28 March 13:08

Mycroft’s popularity doesn’t surprise me at all. He is, after all, incredibly beautiful, clever and well-dressed. And beautiful. Did I mention that?
--Mark Gatiss

"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I’m not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
Robert McCloskey
 

June 7, 2012 8:38 am  #45


Re: The misidentification.

Aurora wrote:

I think this is the "two phone" problem. She sent him the "camera phone" (which had all uplink and connection disabled) but would have used her normal phone to send the text. Likewise when Sherlock interprets the email, Sherlock is still holding the camera phone when she uses her normal phone (hidden behind her back) to text the details to Moriarty.

What "two phone problem"??!! lol I haven't seen that one before.
*now reads the rest of the post*
Ahhhh yeah, dopey me.



And now that I have separated this little problem into another thread, I am seeing where you are coming from with the time of death thing. Irene sends the text and so Sherlock would assume she was alive and THAT is why you think he'd notice a body that had been dead longer than that. All the times etc were confusing me.

We don't actually know how much time passed between the phone call & them being in the morgue. The party was Xmas eve but was the time they were in the morgue Xmas Eve or Xmas night? Molly mentions people were busying with their Xmas things to do (or something; the page with that dialogue won't load for me at the moment) But this could have been Xmas night.
I know Mycroft is good, but he'd need a little time to investigate if there were a suitable dead body laying around the place.


____________________________________________________________________________________________
Also, please note that sentences can also end in full stops. The exclamation mark can be overused.
Sherlock Holmes 28 March 13:08

Mycroft’s popularity doesn’t surprise me at all. He is, after all, incredibly beautiful, clever and well-dressed. And beautiful. Did I mention that?
--Mark Gatiss

"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I’m not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
Robert McCloskey
 

June 7, 2012 8:44 am  #46


Re: The misidentification.

Ah see? I am old & I hate mobile phones so the thought of having two would never cross my mind, lol.


____________________________________________________________________________________________
Also, please note that sentences can also end in full stops. The exclamation mark can be overused.
Sherlock Holmes 28 March 13:08

Mycroft’s popularity doesn’t surprise me at all. He is, after all, incredibly beautiful, clever and well-dressed. And beautiful. Did I mention that?
--Mark Gatiss

"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I’m not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
Robert McCloskey
 

June 7, 2012 8:52 am  #47


Re: The misidentification.

kazza474 wrote:

Yes I am saying that the body wasn't killed necessarily on Xmas eve.

So you believe that presumably Irene was alive right up till the time Sherlock opened the gift?

She may have organised the gift to 'arrive' somehow on his mantelpiece sometime before that. The story could have been that she left it with Kate & a note saying "if I am not back by such & such a time, organise to get this onto Sherlock's mantelpiece."

Yes, I had assumed that and that it was what Sherlock thought. Probably from him saying Mycroft was going to find her dead that night. She could have organised Kate to send the text if she went missing, but I would have expected a double-take from Sherlock on seeing the old body. Will have to think through the implications a bit more.

     Thread Starter
 

June 7, 2012 9:00 am  #48


Re: The misidentification.

Hmm, see I am not convinced that there is too much difference in the aging of a body in the morgue. Once there, I think it is usually chilled quickly for preservation reasons. I'll suss they guys out at a morgue at one of the hospitals I work at. That way I can get the exact answer to the problem; I daresay Google will give a blanket answer that doesn't quite hit the mark.

Morbid conversation lol.


____________________________________________________________________________________________
Also, please note that sentences can also end in full stops. The exclamation mark can be overused.
Sherlock Holmes 28 March 13:08

Mycroft’s popularity doesn’t surprise me at all. He is, after all, incredibly beautiful, clever and well-dressed. And beautiful. Did I mention that?
--Mark Gatiss

"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I’m not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
Robert McCloskey
 

June 7, 2012 9:31 am  #49


Re: The misidentification.

kazza474 wrote:

May I just interject for a moment to say this:

To others reading this, it may have appeared that the 2 of us were just at loggerheads over what this & that means, but I know from my end and I believe Aurora's end, we're nutting out some interesting things here. It's sometimes hard to say exactly what you are thinking; words just don't 'do it' ; in conversation you'd hear my voice raise, or sound inquisitive. If we were face to face, this wouldn't take so long, lol!

We're finding some avenues yet to be explored I think.

Hear, hear! That's exactly where I'm coming from too. (Shock, horror! Kazza and Aurora agreeing on something!  )

Seriously, it is tricky to express what you're thinking without having facial expressions and tone of voice to give additional clues about what you mean (and writing was never my forte) - and often you think you've said something or made something clear but when you look back you realise you haven't at all. It is fun and interesting to probe into some of these less explored questions, though, and hopefully gain new insights.

     Thread Starter
 

June 7, 2012 9:36 am  #50


Re: The misidentification.

You know I sit back sometimes & think ' Scandal doesn't have any secret to be revealed, any mystery to solve, why the heck am I spending so much time on it? '
I don't think it will reveal anything much about the characters; maybe it's more to do with the method of writing or expressing the thoughts of Moftiss and how they come across to us as the viewers?

Now, back to disagreeing on something.........


____________________________________________________________________________________________
Also, please note that sentences can also end in full stops. The exclamation mark can be overused.
Sherlock Holmes 28 March 13:08

Mycroft’s popularity doesn’t surprise me at all. He is, after all, incredibly beautiful, clever and well-dressed. And beautiful. Did I mention that?
--Mark Gatiss

"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I’m not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
Robert McCloskey
 

June 7, 2012 10:12 am  #51


Re: The misidentification.

kazza474 wrote:

And now that I have separated this little problem into another thread, I am seeing where you are coming from with the time of death thing. Irene sends the text and so Sherlock would assume she was alive and THAT is why you think he'd notice a body that had been dead longer than that. All the times etc were confusing me.

We don't actually know how much time passed between the phone call & them being in the morgue. The party was Xmas eve but was the time they were in the morgue Xmas Eve or Xmas night? Molly mentions people were busying with their Xmas things to do (or something; the page with that dialogue won't load for me at the moment) But this could have been Xmas night.
I know Mycroft is good, but he'd need a little time to investigate if there were a suitable dead body laying around the place.

Yes! I think we've finally found the same page. 

With the "what day is this?" question, that's one of the things I was looking out for when I reviewed the scene. I'm pretty sure it is still the same night. When Mycroft calls John after the viewing John, Mrs Hudson and Jeanette are all wearing the same clothes as they were at the party. You get a couple of flashes of John's watch and I think it says 12:30 which would make sense if he and Jeanette still had "plans" for the night (and he was supposed to be seeing his sister for Christmas).

     Thread Starter
 

June 7, 2012 10:20 am  #52


Re: The misidentification.

kazza474 wrote:

Ah see? I am old & I hate mobile phones so the thought of having two would never cross my mind, lol.

I'm kind of in the same boat. I'm pretty sure Sherlock could have changed Irene's text alert sound if he'd wanted to - interesting that he didn't - Irene wouldn't have known that he hadn't, though... unless she followed him and sent a text to check.... I'm wondering (and this will really reveal my ignorance) is if he could have blocked her number if he really didn't want to be bothered with her - and would she have known about that? Trying to stand in Irene's position and see how much she knows about what Sherlock thinks (or doesn't think) about her.

     Thread Starter
 

June 7, 2012 10:26 am  #53


Re: The misidentification.

kazza474 wrote:

Hmm, see I am not convinced that there is too much difference in the aging of a body in the morgue. Once there, I think it is usually chilled quickly for preservation reasons. I'll suss they guys out at a morgue at one of the hospitals I work at. That way I can get the exact answer to the problem; I daresay Google will give a blanket answer that doesn't quite hit the mark.

Morbid conversation lol.

True. Maybe we've both been too influenced by Sherlock - getting caught up in the case and forgetting that perhaps it's not in the best of taste to discuss the decomposition rates of corpses in a public forum. 

     Thread Starter
 

June 7, 2012 10:58 am  #54


Re: The misidentification.

kazza474 wrote:

You know I sit back sometimes & think ' Scandal doesn't have any secret to be revealed, any mystery to solve, why the heck am I spending so much time on it? '
I don't think it will reveal anything much about the characters; maybe it's more to do with the method of writing or expressing the thoughts of Moftiss and how they come across to us as the viewers?

Now, back to disagreeing on something.........

Lol 

For me it's about probing how deep they've gone with the characters and the story. And how they've approached the plots. I think we both agree (but others don't) that the surface view that Sherlock was devastated by Irene's death is too simplistic. But how much deeper than this does it get? Sometimes I wish Sherlock was a full-blown series where all these sub-plots could be fleshed out and resolved. But then they wouldn't have been able to make it such beautiful quality.

     Thread Starter
 

June 8, 2012 6:23 am  #55


Re: The misidentification.

Pretty sure I read an interview with one of the writers, I forget which one, who described Sherlock as "unable to function" around Irene, yet not understanding that the reason for it was because he fancied her. I think he's definitely attracted to her on multiple levels; she's not boring, and she's beautiful. Sherlock being Sherlock, I expect the first reason is much more compelling.

As for the misidentification, that struck me as odd too. Bodies are so very individual -- I hadn't pursued it to its full Fridge Nightmare conclusion, but finding someone with the (forgive my explicitness) right shape of breasts, color/shape of nipples, type of navel, etc etc etc... that would require a terrifying level of cold-bloodedness. So either Sherlock made a very uncharacteristic mistake, he lied to Mycroft, Irene's an aspiring-to-Moriarty-level psychopath, or it's just a garden-variety plot hole.

 

June 8, 2012 7:50 am  #56


Re: The misidentification.

I think what we have here is a good, old-fashioned, incy-wincy, hole in the plot. The scene has a little comic relief with Molly's line. It is also used to confirm the death of Irene so her later reappearance is more shocking/ surprising. It is also used as a vehicle for the scene between Sherlock and Mycroft outside the morgue to establish their abnormal lack of feelings, Mycroft's view of the woman and the danger of Sherlock accepting the cigarette, a thing he wouldn't have done unless he was in some way affected by her death.

This is where you have to suspend your disbelief folks.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't make people into heroes John. Heroes don't exist and if they did I wouldn't be one of them.
 

June 8, 2012 9:13 am  #57


Re: The misidentification.

Hi imane nikko,

Thanks for joining the conversation.  I thought as you do on the difficulty of finding a body double. Other people didn't think it would be that hard, though. I think we'd need to input of a doctor/nurse/pathologist to resolve it.

Hi Davina too, 

Both of you are suggesting it could just be a plot hole. You could well be right. I really hope not, though, because it does affect the way I view Sherlock's character and abilities. I guess that's why it's worrying me so much. I want Sherlock to be clever and controlling the situation, rather than being fooled and manipulated himself. To be honest, in both series it seems on the surface that Sherlock has been pawn in the games of both Irene and Moriarty - he doesn't appear to have any plans or initiative of his own. I really, really want him to be better than this. To be a player rather than just a pawn in at least one of the games that have been played. I'm desperately hoping that he has been up to something in the background or has been more aware than has been let on. Maybe he hasn't. 

I agree, though, there are definitely places in the story where we do have to suspend our belief (that utter farce of a court case!).

     Thread Starter
 

June 8, 2012 10:54 am  #58


Re: The misidentification.

imane nikko wrote:

Pretty sure I read an interview with one of the writers, I forget which one, who described Sherlock as "unable to function" around Irene, yet not understanding that the reason for it was because he fancied her. I think he's definitely attracted to her on multiple levels; she's not boring, and she's beautiful. Sherlock being Sherlock, I expect the first reason is much more compelling.

As for the misidentification, that struck me as odd too. Bodies are so very individual -- I hadn't pursued it to its full Fridge Nightmare conclusion, but finding someone with the (forgive my explicitness) right shape of breasts, color/shape of nipples, type of navel, etc etc etc... that would require a terrifying level of cold-bloodedness. So either Sherlock made a very uncharacteristic mistake, he lied to Mycroft, Irene's an aspiring-to-Moriarty-level psychopath, or it's just a garden-variety plot hole.

This is what I suspect as well. Sherlock is a prodigy for all things intellectual and a self repressed pimply faced 12 year old boy for all things emotional. He likes her but can't admit it to himself. I don't suspect we will ever have a full answer on the body identification but I surely do not understand how it was done or why he was taken in, assuming he was.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disguise is always a self portrait
 

June 9, 2012 11:21 am  #59


Re: The misidentification.

Kazza,

I've thought about your idea of the text being sent by Kate and I think this could work. One thing I didn't think of before was the first thing Mycroft would do when looking for Irene would be to send someone around to her house (or wherever he knows she is). When they arrive they find Kate in a state because she hasn't seen or heard from Irene since the morning before - she didn't even take her phone with her - the police wont allow her to file a missing persons report until she's been missing 48 hrs. Kate tells them Irene was scared for her life and had left instructions to send the text to Sherlock if she didn't turn up. This is passed on to Sherlock so he isn't surprised to find an older body. This would also allow the body to have been in the mortuary system for up to 36 hrs so the PM could already have been done. Irene's tame (blackmailed) pathologist could then alter the body after the PM, confident that it's unlikely to be examined closely again.

     Thread Starter
 

June 9, 2012 11:52 am  #60


Re: The misidentification.

I'm so confused...I've lost track of this thread completely, lol.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eventually everyone will support Johnlock.

Independent OSAJ Affiliate

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum