Offline
Offline
Well, how to comment on that? I´ll try later, when I´m capable of cerebral responses again..
Offline
Just another entertainment article with a few funny moments. Hot stuff? Nah, rather it's nice-ish comedy
Offline
It is quite cute how he keeps mixing up Sherlock and himself.
Offline
Yes, it is. And I like the latex test idea
Offline
I'll be in my bunk.
Offline
Really?
I think Benedict played this very smart.
What an awful interview.
Purile.
His intelligence and sense shine through.
Way to go stupid interviewer, reduce Sherlock to a sexual commodity.
This world stinks.
And female interviewer?
You do us no favours, love.
Offline
I uhm... I..... oh my gosh. I think I have rather red cheeks right now.
But at the same time I could just read his awesome sarcasm... and yet...
Uhm... *THUDS*
Offline
Oh. My. Goodness. I knew this article was due out and started off thinking it was funny, and good on him for playing the game, etc. So I'm a bit embarrassed to admit (but I'll admit it, because I know I won't be the only one and we can all be embarrassed together) that it ended up being unexpectedly, really, really hot. Funny and hot. And also kind of cute (because he's completely aware of the effect!). Mainly hot.
Love the gifs as well, especially him smashing through the glass (nice metaphor!) when he mentions "enter". And Mrs Hudson apparently thinking about what violnists do with their fingers!
Offline
Can I just say that I am very happy about the relaxed reactions in here compared to the madness going on in other places?
Offline
Madness again? Oh my God.
Ben is doing this on purpose, I swear.
Offline
Can I just add a bit of clarification, too.
I came here first, followed the link and I honestly thought that was the WHOLE interview...which may explain my reaction a bit.
I later went to Twitter and there read the whole interview...so now don't feel quite so bad about it .
But really, I don't find that bit very funny and it's not Bendict I'm cross with.but the journalist.
I did read another brilliant interview with BC today, but as I have problem with copy and paste on here...
You know or maybe it was another excerpt from this, sorry I'm getting confused now.
Anyhow he was speaking out against religious extremism...good man,
Offline
I don't know - I thought the journalist did quite a good job, and brought out some interesting things - probably the best one recently. Would have loved to have read/heard more of the Hamlet rant.
And the Sherlock stuff is very funny, but I also think isn't that far off the mark - I never really buy Sherlock as being awkward in bed. He's good at things, does his research, etc. And all that stored up passion.
Offline
I'm just from another planet...
Offline
I think it's important to note that it's an IF--Benedict started out by saying that Sherlock has shut sex out of his life, but IF he had to for a reason...and so on. That's a fair assessment--he's not interested because he considers sex a useless distraction.
Offline
Oh I think everything Benedict said was perfectly fine.
I just thought it a stupid question and if people are getting off on the answer...just freaky.
Last edited by besleybean (October 29, 2014 8:49 pm)
Offline
besleybean wrote:
Oh I think everything Bendict said was perfectly fine.
I just thought it a stupid question and if people are getting off on the answer...just freaky.
Oh, yeah, for sure.
Offline
Freaky, really? Lots of people find Sherlock attractive, and I think that obviously, his actor talking about how he'd have sex is going to be kind of sexy, even when it's in fun. Seriously, I am interested in his take on it - very interested. It's intriguing that he might see such a repressed character as so knowledgeable, and so tuned to reactions, and actually letting himself lose control (in that scene that will never happen!). But what he said was also just hot. Sorry, people. (And nobody has to agree! I didn't expect to think it was myself, when I started reading. I just think it's perfectly understandable for people to feel that way about it. Violinist's hands? Loss of control? Anybody? Never mind, then ).
The interviewer doesn't ask many questions, just gives her opinion and lets him disagree, in his usual articulate way . It was quite clever, I thought, and seemed as if they had a good rapport and were having fun (as far as you can tell from what's on the page!).
Last edited by Liberty (October 30, 2014 1:16 am)
Offline
Liberty wrote:
The interviewer doesn't ask many questions, just gives her opinion and lets him disagree, in his usual articulate way . It was quite clever, I thought, and seemed as if they had a good rapport and were having fun (as far as you can tell from what's on the page!).
Agreed--I thought it was a very good interview. (I also thought it was funny how she noted that he called later to apologize--he does seem to have learned how to backtrack, even though in this case it doesn't seem to have been necessary, if not how to mind his words in the first place!)
Offline
I still don't understand how that part of the interview can make people angry or something. I mean, it's just an adult, talking about sex.
Fictional sex.
( As one of my favourite pupils would say, "Hello. The 50ies called, they want their prudery back...")