Offline
Zatoichi wrote:
We´ll have to wait and see how the show turns out.. but that they intend to "increase their family" is a direct quote of Mark Gatiss. As is that Mary can´t live for seven months without danger/excitement. It doesn´t necessarily mean that Mary will be part of the crime-solving team, but that she´ll be around and will take part in the story. Then we possibly get the baby, and Wiggins.. not much use to speculate right now, but for me it sounds as if there will be a lot of exceptional characters around.
Edit: Cross-posted with you, mrshouse, I see you already made the same points..
Right, zatoichi. And every fan has to decide for himself if he would like this enough to keep following. For myself I rather have the feeling I would quit.
Offline
I would not interpret the word "family" in this sense. I mean, there have always been minor characters throughout the series and one could say that they form a sort of family. Nobody ever complained about the Christmas party in ASiB or Gred appearing out of the blue in HoB. For me the important thing is the dynamic between Sherlock and John. If this is fundamentally changed, I will think again. If not, they can have a thousand Billys around for all that I care (btw, I like Billy, just as an aside).
Offline
nakahara wrote:
Steven: “Everyone’s cleverer than Sherlock!”
That´s the problem, right there..
And that´s the only thing that will ultimately make me quit the show if it continues in S4. I guess I could live with Mary being a good girl or with Johnlock becoming canon, but I can´t live with watching Sherlock descend into that role.
P.S.: Thanks for shedding some positivity, Susi!!
Offline
I saw that "Everyone's cleverer than Sherlock" as a joke.
Offline
Thanks, Zatoichi. There has been so much negativity in the fandom and also in here. And then I remember a little quote I read some time ago: "About 99.9 percent of the things we worry about never happen."
Offline
Vhanja wrote:
I saw that "Everyone's cleverer than Sherlock" as a joke.
It probably was meant as one, but with Mycroft being much smarter than Sherlock, Magnussen outsmarting him and leading him into a trap and Mary getting to the solution of their problem much faster (and generally being so much more understanding of human nature and better at remembering details etc.) it isn´t exactly a totally absurd thing to say..
Last edited by Zatoichi (January 7, 2015 12:44 pm)
Offline
Vhanja wrote:
I saw that "Everyone's cleverer than Sherlock" as a joke.
It maybe was but in light of what we actually saw in the show (and what Zatoichi pointed out brilliantly in one of her previous posts, enumerating moments when Sherlock was ridiculed and laughed at), it feels too true to home.
Offline
I agree. I love many things about series 3 but it somehow felt like a prolonged penance for and belittling of Sherlock (probably for things that were not his fault).
Offline
Hm, I've never viewed it like that. I think what you guys are saying is taking it way too far. Sherlock solved the case in TEH and TSoT. In the latter he needed a push or two, but he solved them both alone. He was outsmarted by Magnussen, yes, just like he was (kind of) outsmarted by Moriarty. Which I think is good - there is no suspense if your hero is omnipotent. And TLV ends with Sherlock returning, because everybody knows he is the only one who can deal with Moriarty.
What I saw in S3 was a more nuanced picture. Sherlock not always running the show and being the arrogant sod that he was in S1 + S2, caring little for no one but himself and the case. I see S3 as an emotional development for Sherlock and John particularly. They can't just repeat the "Oh, you're deductions are so awesome"-thing from S1 and (partly) S2.
But to not make the show too mushy, as TSoT threathened to do, they made Sherlock more cold and calculating in HLV, again changing the dynamics and challenging the viewers (and the in-show characters). I love what they are doing, always keeping us on our toes.
But, yeah, there is certainly an amount of penance in S3. Long overdue, in my mind. Sherlock has had it coming for two seasons now. It's the only way he can grow as a character, and become more than just an arrogant "shut up" sod.
Last edited by Vhanja (January 7, 2015 12:53 pm)
Offline
This is funny - I never viewed him as cold and calculating in HLV with the one exception of the Janine trick (although she was not exactly a damsel in distress). He tries to help Lady Smallwood and nearly pays for it with his life. He tries to warn John and again nearly pays for it with his life. He is repeatedly threatened by Mary (and Magnussen in the deleted scene). He shoots Magnussen to keep John and Mary safe and is (nearly) punished for it while Mary goes free.
And this is meant as a payback for being an arse in series 1 and 2? Not really.
I just wish someone would finally realise how much Sherlock cares for other people instead of calling him a psychopath over and over again.
Offline
And Janine was hardly an innocent wronged party as this meta indicates:
Offline
The "cold and calculated" part was for his fake relationship with Janine and how he shot Magnussen in cold blood. That is a complete turn-over from his warm and mushy side in TSoT, and was done deliberately by the writers.
I don't think anything he went through in TLV was meant as penance. And the people close to him have known for a long time how much he cares. None of them calls him a psychopath (John does it once, which isn't meant literally, but is done when he is extremely frustrated and angry). The one who calls him that (sosiopath) the most is himself.
Offline
Sherlock is a sad eyed lonely puppy that must be protected at all costs!
*crawls back to corner*
Offline
Thing is, he genuinely likes Mary.
Offline
I think it´s interesting how two people can watch the same show, and one thinks "wow what an arrogant sod, he definitely has some penance coming " and one goes "waah he is the best, what an irresistibly sexy bastard, please never change !!"..
Offline
Zatoichi wrote:
I think it´s interesting how two people can watch the same show, and one thinks "wow what an arrogant sod, he definitely has some penance coming " and one goes "waah he is the best, what an irresistibly sexy bastard, please never change !!"..
One doesn't have to exclude the other - I think both of those things when watching the show.
Offline
What would we all do now without this show?
Offline
We would be forced to get a life.
Offline
I might be wrong, but I think the discussion was less about him being always brilliant or omnipotent, but that his powers and his mental wellbeing was belittled and diminished at the costs of the Watsons being together and happy and Mary showing to be more adept in a couple of scenes.
Offline
Yes, indeed. And of course that he had to say sorry over and over again for bringing down a criminal network and saving other people whereas Mary did not once … but I am repeating myself.