BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



July 31, 2016 8:19 pm  #6161


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

But surely modern Sherlock is beyond that?


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

July 31, 2016 8:42 pm  #6162


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

But if the "problem" was just that he was gay, he could have sidestepped the issue by just going along with what Watson said.  But as you say, Besleybean, being gay isn't a problem in modern times, so why would Sherlock have it in his mind palace as something to be addressed?  Modern day Sherlock's issue can't be that his sexual orientation would be unacceptable in Victorian times.   It has to be something that bothers him in the modern day. 

I think the conversation edges him closer to the truth.  He starts out denying it, but Watson always sees through him.   So he's not so much lying to himself, as having a reluctant, uncomfortable exploration. 

 

July 31, 2016 8:49 pm  #6163


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Liberty wrote:

But if the "problem" was just that he was gay, he could have sidestepped the issue by just going along with what Watson said.  But as you say, Besleybean, being gay isn't a problem in modern times, so why would Sherlock have it in his mind palace as something to be addressed?  Modern day Sherlock's issue can't be that his sexual orientation would be unacceptable in Victorian times.   It has to be something that bothers him in the modern day. 

Being heterosexual is even less a problem. So why wouldn´t Sherlock just say to his inner Watson: Ok, I find her attractive. What would he loose considering he is actually speaking to himself? He had absolutely no problem to imagine naked Irene in TSOT, he frequently watches porn as we get to know in HLV ... but he´s suddenly too squeamish to admit such banal thing even to himself?
 


-----------------------------------

I cannot live without brainwork. What else is there to live for? Stand at the window there. Was there ever such a dreary, dismal, unprofitable world? See how the yellow fog swirls down the street and drifts across the dun-coloured houses. What could be more hopelessly prosaic and material? What is the use of having powers, Doctor, when one has no field upon which to exert them?

 

July 31, 2016 8:50 pm  #6164


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Yes, because for him sentiment is weakness.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

July 31, 2016 9:01 pm  #6165


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

It´s only weakness when you display it in front of other people who can use your feelings against you (the way Irene Adler did). But what weakness it is to admit to your own self: oh, that random woman had a nice pair of legs?


-----------------------------------

I cannot live without brainwork. What else is there to live for? Stand at the window there. Was there ever such a dreary, dismal, unprofitable world? See how the yellow fog swirls down the street and drifts across the dun-coloured houses. What could be more hopelessly prosaic and material? What is the use of having powers, Doctor, when one has no field upon which to exert them?

 

July 31, 2016 9:03 pm  #6166


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Chortle.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

July 31, 2016 9:07 pm  #6167


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I don't think it's about heterosexuality either - I think sexual orientation is kind of irrelevant here.  It's about Sherlock choosing to detach himself from it, and suppress those feelings.  He chooses to be alone, and I think that's something that has come up in other episodes.  And I suspect it will come up in S4, one way or another.

 

July 31, 2016 9:08 pm  #6168


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I think so, too.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

July 31, 2016 10:00 pm  #6169


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Liberty wrote:

I don't think it's about heterosexuality either - I think sexual orientation is kind of irrelevant here.  It's about Sherlock choosing to detach himself from it, and suppress those feelings.  He chooses to be alone, and I think that's something that has come up in other episodes.  And I suspect it will come up in S4, one way or another.

But why is he supressing these feelings then?

Doting parents
Brother that spends all his time taking gentle care of you
Loyal friends 
Even your former enemy turns your biggest fan
Femme fatale you defeated in the past sends you roses after you were shot
Your landlady just adores you

Sherlock: Oh, woe is me! I am so hurt! I must supress all my feelings and always be alone!

Me: ?????


-----------------------------------

I cannot live without brainwork. What else is there to live for? Stand at the window there. Was there ever such a dreary, dismal, unprofitable world? See how the yellow fog swirls down the street and drifts across the dun-coloured houses. What could be more hopelessly prosaic and material? What is the use of having powers, Doctor, when one has no field upon which to exert them?

 

July 31, 2016 10:02 pm  #6170


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I do think there was a trauma when he was younger.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

July 31, 2016 10:41 pm  #6171


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

SolarSystem wrote:

Vhanja wrote:

There are movies and series I greatly dislike, but I don't go on fan forums to write why I dislike them, I just stay away from it all.

I agree. I would never join a fan forum dedicated to a tv show or movie I don't like. But what if you had fallen in love with a tv show years ago and then the show is taking a direction and the creators are making choices you aren't as happy with as you were before? Does that make you a bad fan? Does that take the right away from you to stay on a fan forum you've joined years ago? Does that take the right away from you to continue posting on that forum, even if your posts express your sadness and grief and also criticism?
Also, can you give examples for mocking and raging on this forum during the last few days? Or are you talking about tumblr? This forum is not tumblr, so please don't lump together fans on tumblr and this forum.
 

Thank you, Solar System. 

 

August 1, 2016 5:24 am  #6172


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

nakahara wrote:

Liberty wrote:

I don't think it's about heterosexuality either - I think sexual orientation is kind of irrelevant here.  It's about Sherlock choosing to detach himself from it, and suppress those feelings.  He chooses to be alone, and I think that's something that has come up in other episodes.  And I suspect it will come up in S4, one way or another.

But why is he supressing these feelings then?

Doting parents
Brother that spends all his time taking gentle care of you
Loyal friends 
Even your former enemy turns your biggest fan
Femme fatale you defeated in the past sends you roses after you were shot
Your landlady just adores you

Sherlock: Oh, woe is me! I am so hurt! I must supress all my feelings and always be alone!

Me: ?????

Good question. Of course you should never underestimate the influence mean class mates can have on a child but that should not be enough to supress your feelings so profoundly.

What kind of trauma could lead to such a behaviour? Losing someone you love deeply comes to my mind. Someone more important than a dog.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I still believe that love conquers all!

     

"Quick, man, if you love me."
 

August 1, 2016 6:53 am  #6173


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Again, I'm wondering if we're going to find out more in S4.   There's that whispered "Redbeard" right at the end of the conversation - a clue?   But "I made me" does suggest that it was a decision, rather than the effect of trauma (although both could go together). 

I agree, Nakahara, that so far, he's had a pretty OK life (that we know of).  He actually seems very resilient.   There does seem a choice to be above human affairs.  I thnk I would actually prefer if there wasn't some past trauma that created him (beyond losing his dog). 

 

August 1, 2016 7:16 am  #6174


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I too hope the dog is the only trauma.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

August 1, 2016 7:27 am  #6175


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

besleybean wrote:

I too hope the dog is the only trauma.

Okay, I am a cat-lover, so please forgive me my question: how can taking down a dog be so traumatic that you shut yourself away from friendship and love? Painful, yes, of course, but traumatic?


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I still believe that love conquers all!

     

"Quick, man, if you love me."
 

August 1, 2016 7:38 am  #6176


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

I don't know, it's a puzzle.
Which is why ultimately there maybe more to Redbeard than just a childhood pet being destroyed.
I do tend to feel that Sherlock chooses not to meddle in relationships, to make him better at his job.
But we do know he is capable of love, we've seen him love at least two people in the show so far: Mrs Hudson and John.
Some would argue Irene was a third...but we'll brush over that one.
I am a cat person, too.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

August 1, 2016 7:52 am  #6177


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

He doesn't completely shut himself away from friendship, though.  He actively courts John as a friend and publicly says he loves him.  And he has other friendships which have developed a bit over the series.  

And loss (of a dog, or whatever) isn't the only story there.  There's also the relationship with Mycroft who seems to have brought him up to be emotionally detached, and to aspire to be more so.   I think there's also still an element of him believing that it makes him better at his work.  And there's the "proof" from Irene, that falling for somebody leads to disaster and humiliation. 

Maybe the loss of a dog could have that effect on somebody who was particularly vulnerable and emotional.  However, I agree that it's not such a big deal - it's probably part of many of our childhoods.  And the Sherlock we know now is emotional (although repressed), but not particularly vulnerable - as I said, he strikes me as quite resilient in some ways (being able to go through with what he did in TRF and afterwards would take quite a strong person, I think). 

Again, I'm coming back to "I made me".  It wasn't something that happened that made him that way against his will (he became incapable of romantic relationships), but he chose it, he worked at it, he created this version of himself.   A trauma could certainly have been the trigger and the reason he decided to do that, but it didn't "make" him.  Maybe. 

 

August 1, 2016 7:54 am  #6178


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Yes, I agree with that.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

August 1, 2016 8:07 am  #6179


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Me too.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I still believe that love conquers all!

     

"Quick, man, if you love me."
 

August 1, 2016 8:17 am  #6180


Re: Johnlock: The Official Debate

Liberty wrote:

Again, I'm coming back to "I made me".  It wasn't something that happened that made him that way against his will (he became incapable of romantic relationships), but he chose it, he worked at it, he created this version of himself.   A trauma could certainly have been the trigger and the reason he decided to do that, but it didn't "make" him.  Maybe. 

So not true emotional repression then? It´s simply his leaning towards emo or goth lifestyle and it´s the matter of his own choice?

In that case, why does he reacts with near panic at Molly´s mention of sex in TSOT, I wonder? If you choose to be the cold "calculating machine" that still doesn´t mean you must get all flustered when someone around you mention their intimate life. As a detective, you probably face such saucy talks pretty frequently... and yet you are on pins and needles the moment somebody just mentions the subject... hmmm.
 


-----------------------------------

I cannot live without brainwork. What else is there to live for? Stand at the window there. Was there ever such a dreary, dismal, unprofitable world? See how the yellow fog swirls down the street and drifts across the dun-coloured houses. What could be more hopelessly prosaic and material? What is the use of having powers, Doctor, when one has no field upon which to exert them?

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum