Yeah I've favourited a whole spoiler page, but haven't as yet had the energy to read it!

besleybean wrote:

Yeah I've favourited a whole spoiler page, but haven't as yet had the energy to read it!

 
Yeah, you kind of have to ask yourself, do I really want to know...

Like, if someone had told you "Sherlock jumps off the top of St Barts" before Series 2 came out, would you have thanked them for it? You wouldn't have known the circumstances, or the outcome or the storyline, but it still would have spoiled a hell of a lot for you!

Ivy wrote:

I think this whole thread is a spoiler. You just have to avoid certain threads (like "the empty hearse" one) when Sherlock is on BBC next winter. I think photos are O.K. but I don't want to read any dialogue or description of scenes that these fans hear or see when they visit the set. I won't wait til Sherlock is on German TV, because I simply can't (and the dubbing is not my thing) We could use SPOILER in certain thread titles then.
But I totally can understand you, ancientsgate.

The discussion threads here are notorious for going off onto tangents, regardless of what their title/purpose is-- something that normally I fully enjoy, lol, but I don't know. We'll see what the future brings.

Possible SPOILERS:

Shall we try to deduce something by looking at AA's clothing/appearence?
1. She is not John's type. He is supposed to be interested in girls who are tall, brunette and thin with curly dark hair.
2. She doesn't look like Mary in canon; at least not in my head canon. Mary with this alarming shade of red?

She has short blonde hair, she looks friendly and affable. The kind of type who wears jumpers.
My first impression was that she is John-female-version. Is she Harry? She can also be a client.
By casting her as Harry she is given a role where she can appear from time to time when needed.
Perhaps John spends some time at Harry's after the fall. Maybe John and Sherlock had a row after Sherlock's return?? Or John is investigating away on his own and Sherlock comes to rescue him.

I really like to speculate a bit. But I don't want to know. I hope that we won't see many more outdoor scenes. Or at least that I am able to distract myself from looking at twitter spoilers.

 

Last edited by Be (March 27, 2013 12:20 pm)

Be wrote:

Possible SPOILERS:

Shall we try to deduce something by looking at AA's clothing/appearence?
1. She is not John's type. He is supposed to be interested in girls who are tall, brunette and thin with curly dark hair.
2. She doesn't look like Mary in canon; at least not in my head canon. Mary with this alarming shade of red?

She has short blonde hair, she looks friendly and affable. The kind of type who wears jumpers.
My first impression was that she is John-female-version. Is she Harry? She can also be a client.
By casting her as Harry she is given a role where she can appear form time to time when needed.
Perhaps John spends some time at Harry's after the fall. Maybe John and Sherlock had a row after Sherlock's return?? Or John is investigation away on his own and Sherlock comes to rescue him.

I really like to speculate a bit. But I don't want to know. I hope that we won't see many more outdoor scenes. Or at least that I am abel to distract myself from looking at twitter spoilers.

 

Nice deduction ;) I' excited to see wheater you're right. I think it would be interesting to bring in Harry.
It's not much of a spoiler in my opinion, do we even know that it was the fist episode they are shooting? Don't they shoot them all at once?

Schmiezi wrote:

Great. Now I've joined twitter.

 
Be careful. There is a chinese proverb: If you are looking for a tiger you must be prepared to find one.

...wow, following this also improves my Italian!

I want to try to avoid any major, genuine spoilers on this forum until the series airs in the UK. Then people who have seen them can discuss the episodes in the relevant sections and people who are still waiting to see them can just avoid those sections.

I don't class things like "Amanda Abbington is in it and she might be Mary" or "Sherlock arrived on a motorbike and ran towards the fire" as direct spoilers. They're hints at what's going on and people can speculate over them but we won't know for certain until we see the episode.

If I see anyone posting anything more serious, such as dialogue from the set or pictures or unofficial news that hasn't already been reported in the press then I'll remove it.
 

Bankruptcy is always individual in the UK. Whether a couple are married or not is irrelevant. Debts are individually liable.

besleybean wrote:

Possibly all I should say here is that I have very strong views on the subject, particularly linked to patriotism. 
I am not sure what the rules are about slagging Sherlock cast members.
I had to delete a post on my last board, when I called Benedict an idiot for smoking!
But a few general points that would apply to anybody, anytime and anywhere: In my opinion, there is a world of difference between what is legal and what is moral.
Having said that, I recognise we are not talking about mass murder, rape or paedophilia here.
Generally good people can make errors of judgement,particularly when they have professional accountants advising them.
For me it's more about people letting themselves down, not presenting a good image and really(and this is purely personal) losing credibility. They may also want to assess what a couple is.
I do also think the wider issues of freedom of press and the world wide recession are relevant.
But I will conclude by adding: my tolerance of wealthy celebs is very low.
I remain a Benedict Cumberbatch fan.
But rampant capitalism stinks: it breeds greed.
None of this of course affects actors talents or abilities.

I'm not entirely sure I'm getting this right but I get the feeling you are talking about the topic that I started. And I am very sorry about that. I didn't mean to make a discussion about money and stuff, I'm not exactly what you would call a fan of capitalism myself. It was just ment to be an aside nothing I really wanted to be discussed. So I apolpgise for having started this. Let's just forget about it.