BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.
1 of 1
| The Science Of Deduction » A cipher from my classmate » May 29, 2012 10:33 am |
- hx1997
- Replies: 14
-
Oh, still no one got it? do you need more clues?
| The Science Of Deduction » A cipher from my classmate » May 26, 2012 4:46 am |
- hx1997
- Replies: 14
-
Sammy wrote:Easy? Well, not for me
But it's supposed to be a little text in english, right?
Hm...Yep, the original text is hidden in english, and the numbers are really important clues.
| The Science Of Deduction » A cipher from my classmate » May 24, 2012 3:40 pm |
- hx1997
- Replies: 14
-
One of my classmates sent me a cipher, and I had already deciphered it, so I post it here.
The only clue he gave me was that the original text says something narcissistic.
TRGHEE 37
CSRW EQWA TBOAR 10 9 21
OHFB 10
TFRHDIS 75
SUD MCBM ARIY 6 9 13
IOS 5
SUOPL EILRLAYT IPV6AE 26 157 41
This one may be easy, however, have a go.
| General Sherlock Discussion » Why not James Moriarty? » May 21, 2012 3:50 pm |
- hx1997
- Replies: 8
-
Davina wrote:
I guess it's because it is a modernised version of Sherlock Holmes using the diminutive 'Jim' makes it more up-to-date. His name is James, I think that is used in the courtroom scene, but he uses Jim from IT as it is more informal.
Yeah, you're right. I didn't notice that and I rewatched the courtroom scene just now, his formal name is James Moriarty. Thanks. :-)
| General Sherlock Discussion » Why not James Moriarty? » May 21, 2012 3:38 pm |
- hx1997
- Replies: 8
-
Davina wrote:
Jim is a shortened form of James.
Interesting. Got it, thanks.
| General Sherlock Discussion » Why not James Moriarty? » May 21, 2012 3:23 pm |
- hx1997
- Replies: 8
-
Could be boring, I am just curious about it.
There is a Jim Moriarty in Sherlock, and as I know it is James Moriarty in the original.
Then why there is a difference? Is Jim just a nickname or they are completely different persons?
1 of 1
