BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

Series Four News » Series 4 Setlock (potential spoilers) » May 20, 2016 3:48 am

sweetskates1
Replies: 3660

Go to post

Me too 


This Is The Phantom Lady wrote:

Very lucky people around there! 

Gosh I literally can't wait to see the result of all of this, it's driving me nuts! 

 

Series Four News » sherlock series 4 (spoilers inside) » May 17, 2016 8:52 pm

sweetskates1
Replies: 2504

Go to post

Just switched over to the other thread regarding spoilers. You guys are so amazing! I am re-reading TDD now. 

Series Four News » sherlock series 4 (spoilers inside) » May 17, 2016 7:51 pm

sweetskates1
Replies: 2504

Go to post

 I am done with my masters and binge watching Sherlock in between watching for updates on Setlock.

Life is so good.

Any thoughts or findings regarding the pictures of hospital directory signs floating around social media?

Originally, I thought that Baby Watson was ill or injured but others seem to think Sherlock is the patient. Thoughts? 

Series Four News » sherlock series 4 (spoilers inside) » May 15, 2016 6:58 am

sweetskates1
Replies: 2504

Go to post

Thank you so much! 

mrshouse wrote:

May I cordially invite you to the "official Johnlock thread"?
We discuss the different views there.

 

Series Four News » Series 4 Setlock (potential spoilers) » May 14, 2016 3:47 am

sweetskates1
Replies: 3660

Go to post

Very curious about all hints. getting more excited about season 4 every minute. 

Series Four News » sherlock series 4 (spoilers inside) » May 14, 2016 3:45 am

sweetskates1
Replies: 2504

Go to post

I agree with this comment and I have no idea where the idea of the protagonists being in love came from. I simply do not see the clues nor do i understand how the theory could make logical sense given the sequence of events. Would someone please explain where the idea comes from? which clues made you think that they are pining for each other?


kgreen20 wrote:

Good point, Susi!

One last point, and then it's back to the main discussion: I believe that the series will keep John straight.  After all, up to this point, Moffat and Gatiss may not have faithfully followed canon, but neither have they completely ignored it.  Just look at all the events in the show that they have taken from canon!  Sherlock's hiatus and return, John's marriage to Mary, Moriarity's villainy, John's introduction to Sherlock through Mark Stamford, etc., etc.  On that basis, I have reason to believe that the show won't deviate from canon in regards to Sherlock and John's relationship either.  (That's also why I strongly suspect that Mary and the baby will be killed off in Season 4.  Because in canon, Mary dies, and Dr. Watson does not raise a child as a single father.  Instead, he ends up selling his practice and moving back to 221B Baker Street.)

OK, then, back to the original topic!


 

 

Series Four News » Series 4 Setlock (potential spoilers) » May 12, 2016 7:05 pm

sweetskates1
Replies: 3660

Go to post

I am not sure what exactly Amanda tweeted. Honestly, I absolutely LOVE her as Mary. She perfectly complements John.  Also, the fact that she looks like an average woman is so refreshing. Finally, a femme fatale that looks like the woman next door. The fandom can be very obsessive and overly sensitive. With that said, she made a mistake by using foul language and has been humbled by it. Albeit, perhaps, only momentarily. Sherlock without Mary simply seems wrong now. I don't care if her dying is "cannon." Heck, Molly sure as heck isn't and I adore her. 

Canada - something to do with going back to the last place Mary had an assignment as an assassin/spy before London? I would LOVE it if somehow Ms. Irene Adler happened to be there.... yassssss
 

Series Four News » Series 4 Setlock (potential spoilers) » May 8, 2016 5:28 pm

sweetskates1
Replies: 3660

Go to post

I don't think he is mourning his spouse. I don't think he wears a ring as a sign of his own marriage. Someone he considers close to him may be 'dead' though. I think Mary. 

Series Four News » Series 4 Setlock (potential spoilers) » May 8, 2016 1:44 am

sweetskates1
Replies: 3660

Go to post

 OMG SusiGo thank you for sharing! This would fit my theory.

Series Four Suggestions & Ideas » Mary's Death » May 1, 2016 8:55 pm

sweetskates1
Replies: 422

Go to post

I think she has always been good. It's just that she probably had to infiltrate Moriarty's network as part of her job. She coincidentally got assigned John as a target but she fell in love. That's why she couldn't risk telling Holmes. I also think that she has worked/cooperated with MI6 given that she was able to access the records so swiftly in front of Mycroft. It may also explain why Mycroft did not go the wedding. He is always being watched. Sherlock is freelance, Mycroft is the British government. She will have to leave London with the baby upon realizing that they will never be safe alongside John and Sherlock. That's why there will be heartache. John will resent his relationship with Holmes. He will resent Mary for her past and they will be separated. Sherlock became a murdered to save Mary - he did it out of love and conviction. She will not die. He will save her again. And she is just too darned skilled to not make it out of London alive. This is not her first rodeo.

Introductions Please... » Hi!! :) » May 1, 2016 8:46 pm

I am so excited to have found this forum! I really love reading your comments and theories! I am full-time student in the US working towards my master's degree in International Studies. 

Series Four Suggestions & Ideas » Will the kid die too? » May 1, 2016 8:39 pm

sweetskates1
Replies: 52

Go to post

I think that an attempt will be made on the lives of John, Baby Watson and Mary to get to Holmes. They will survive but realize that Mary and the Baby will never be safe if they stay in London. Irene Adler is working for Moriarty still but decides to stop and goes into hiding.  Mary and the Baby will go live in Latin America. Irene will go to USA. John will feel the extreme loss , Sherlock will go into retirement for a moment. Then, they will move back in together and continue solving crimes. 

Sherlock Holmes wrote:

It's canon that Mary dies and most people are expecting it to happen at some point in Series 4. They could always go a different route and have her in some witness protection programme where John could never see her again; or in prison for the rest of her life, but whatever happens, we know they are going to get her out of the picture.

What then, do you think will happen to Baby Watson? It would be quite shocking to kill a child after its been born, even for Moftiss. Killing it whilst its still in the womb is generally more acceptable. So, maybe a miscarriage?

Or do you think the baby will survive? If so, how can it be a part of Sherlock and John's life? Sherlock, John & The Baby? Sounds like a trashy sitcom about a gay couple bringing up a kid.

 

Series Four Suggestions & Ideas » Moriarty theories » May 1, 2016 8:34 pm

sweetskates1
Replies: 79

Go to post

I think the Moriarty we met is dead. He is the brother of Professor Moriarty who killed Sherrinford and has been after Mummy Holmes for decades. Professor Moriarty is alive but Jim Moriarty is indeed dead.

Series Four Suggestions & Ideas » If we assume that Mary lives, how do you think S4 would play out? » May 1, 2016 8:30 pm

sweetskates1
Replies: 68

Go to post

I agree. And I think that Mary will become more like her Victorian counterpart - only joining here and there which may anger her after a while. 

Swanpride wrote:

I think we are getting off tangent here...the question is not if Mary should die or not, or how to get rid of her, but if she lives, how can we imagine the show dealing with it and the baby. Here are a couple of thoughts (I am working under the assumption that she and John are meant to be with each other):
I can actually see a lot of fun you can have with the baby without it coming off as a sitcom. I mean, can you imagine Sherlock commenting on what one should do with a baby? It could be hillarious.
Mrs. Watson would surely love to act as babysitter from time to time.
I would love some criminal attacking Mary and John, thinking that John is the dangerous one, only to be taken out by Mary...and then John having to explain that to the police.
I can also imagine that Mary and John would be very unconventional parents from time to time. I can totally see John lugging a baby around to a crime scene and Lestrate being all experated about it, while John says "Well, Mary is busy, and it is not like we are doing anything dangerous here."
If they need to get rid off Mary and the baby for a while, they could use the "Mary needs a cure/wants to visit Janine in Sussex and she took the baby with her, but John had to stay behind for work" explanation. Or the other way around. Sherlock goes on a case in the country (for example in an adaptation of the Copper Beeches) and John is so nervous about him going alone that Mary says "well, then go after him, I can manage a few days without him". I can imagine them writing first some really funny scenes with John acting like a dweep and then a really funny scene in which Sherlock can't believe that he suddenly turns up.
And the older the child gets, the more possibilities are there....I mean, we did enjoy Sherlock's interaction with Archie, right?
 

 

The Abominable Bride » Redbeard theories post TAB » May 1, 2016 7:58 pm

sweetskates1
Replies: 47

Go to post

I think that Redbeard was an actual dog given to him by Sherrinford Holmes before he was murdered.  I also think that  Sherrinford was an older version of Mycroft. Much more intelligent than Sherlock and much more worried/emotional than Mycroft. Sherlock was always the least intelligent and the most emotional of the three. The most human and the most plain. The mother and the dead brother had the same levels of intelligence/sentimentality. She tried to cover up her work with the MI6 and to balance her life as a mother/wife/spy like Mary! Sherrinford gave the dog to Sherlock to train him as a pirate of ideas, as an investigator, as a sniffer of clues. Sherrinford was more a father figure than their own biological father to Sherlock because they shared the quirky deduction ability. Sherrinford was already in deep with the MI6 fighting his own Moriarty (perhaps Professor Moriarty). Sherlock was like baby Watson - a pawn, a weak link that could be exploited and used to destroy the real target (Sherrinford).  Mycroft has alway been the smart one because he has never allowed "the chemical on the losing side" to get between him and the intellectual goal.

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum