BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

Benedict's Non-Sherlock Work » After The Dance » April 2, 2014 7:50 pm

natal
Replies: 3

Go to post

Ooooh it's such a pity! I guess I will have to try NT Archives if I made it for Hamlet next year. Fingers crossed!

Benedict's Non-Sherlock Work » After The Dance » April 2, 2014 3:27 pm

natal
Replies: 3

Go to post

I ve been looking all over internet for After the Dance play but can't find it anywhere. Can anybody help me watch it, buy it or.. whatever? Any link or torrent maybe? I read great reviews both for the play and BC performance.

Meet The Members » Tell us what part of the world you come from » March 30, 2014 2:54 am

natal
Replies: 319

Go to post

Greetings from Greece! I heard that BC used to visit us for holidays, maybe I ll be lucky and see him in Athens now that summer is coming.  Or else next year London for Hamlet!Great forum

Benedict's Non-Sherlock Work » Hamlet » March 27, 2014 9:26 pm

natal
Replies: 195

Go to post

I am not sure if its mentioned already but look at this
The dates have been announced!Hamletdirected by Lyndsey Turner
starring Benedict Cumberbatch=1.33em5 August–31 October 2015 
 Tickets:to be confirmed

Exact dates: to be confirmed

Tickets are not yet on sale. Booking dates and further information will be announced in May 2014.

 http://www.barbican.org.uk/hamlet/

Benedict's Non-Sherlock Work » Third Star » March 21, 2014 2:50 pm

natal
Replies: 228

Go to post

Very touching movie. It puts you into many thoughts about the way we live our lives.

Benedict's Non-Sherlock Work » Rumpole on Radio 4 » March 20, 2014 10:03 pm

natal
Replies: 23

Go to post

Oooh that's great. Thank you!

Character Analysis » Sherlock’s Sexuality: An In-Depth Contemplation and Study » March 13, 2014 10:59 pm

natal
Replies: 720

Go to post

QuiteExtraordinary wrote:

besleybean wrote:

I think it's fairly true to say Sherlock's only ever been distracted(in gender times) by females. He also chose to prerend to have a girlfriend, not a boyfriend.
He has kissed 4(I think) females in the show.

Yes, but apart from the (fake) Janine kiss they were all platonic kisses. Really cute ones though.

One thing I currently have a problem with is people implying that Sherlock and John are openly in love with each other already and aware of it. Don't get me wrong, I still think it's a cute idea that they might fall in love at some point in the future, but that it's just a possibility at the moment that only exists subconsciously. Lately, especially on tumblr of course, I've seen many people practically trying to force everyone else to believe that S3 is some kind of musical-worthy unrequited love plot in which Sherlock is openly pining for John and jealous because of John's relationship with Mary. For example, that in the "best man" scene Sherlock didn't fall silent because he was overwhelmed, but because he was so disappointed that he had to be the best friend instead of the boyfriend. And so forth. Well, you can possibly view it that way but I have to say I find it awful. It would ruin some of the best moments for me and turn the show into something I really don't like.

JESUS! Where are all these coming from? Oh God I will shoot myself. S mercy plzzz. Its unlikely a tv show like this will turn up a gay romance (no offence). I cant understand why many people dont even think (not adapt) the obvious but trying to find the hidden meaning behind words. John likes women clearly, he had many of them. Irene likes both genders, prefers women. Serlock plays his mind game with women, nowhere, not once we saw the opposite. How would he like Mary if he wanted John for himself for example? This talk will never end 

Character Analysis » Sherlock’s Sexuality: An In-Depth Contemplation and Study » March 13, 2014 9:17 am

natal
Replies: 720

Go to post

SusiGo wrote:

That is not entirely true, bb. Look at the scene with Mycroft in TEH before he encounters John. Mycroft wants to talk to him about the terrorist threat while Sherlock is totally focused on what his shirt looks like and his reunion with John. You may argue that he is nervous because he is about to see his friend after two years being dead. 
But why would he care about his looks? And about John's looks, i.e. the moustache? That it ages him? He at once decides that "we" must do something about this and he cannot be seen walking around with an old man. 
And Mycroft all the while going on about the case while Sherlock does not give a damn about it at the moment. 

In fact we have a mirror scene for this in HLV when Sherlock wants to talk about Magnussen while John simply cannot shut up about Sherlock having a girlfriend (Much more could be said about John's reaction in this whole scene but this might not be the place for it).

And, finally, there are Sherlock's words "It's always you, John Watson, you keep me right." 

So distraction occurs. He may be distracted by men and women alike. To me it does not prove anything about him being attracted to women. 
 

 
On the other the more obvious may be the truth. S is nervous for seeing John after 2 years and we wants to see how his friend is been doing without him, is he is ok in this new relasionship. John is suprised that S has a girlfiend and happy to see his friend having some real life. Thats it for me! So simple "brotherly" care. Nowhere in series we see something else like Irene's, nowhere. And I think and hope to see some plot with her it would be very interesting. But thats just my thoughts!

Character Analysis » Sherlock’s Sexuality: An In-Depth Contemplation and Study » March 13, 2014 12:14 am

natal
Replies: 720

Go to post

If S would let himself be attracted by a person, that would be a female one. All the times he is kind of distracted by a person is a woman. He loves John as a friend, his best and only. Its another matter that he admires most the mental qualities, of course that goes for all. All I understand is that he doesnt want to trouble himself with love and romance cause he will be distracted.

Series Four Suggestions & Ideas » Moriarty theories » March 11, 2014 11:21 pm

natal
Replies: 79

Go to post

Swanpride wrote:

I stick to "We get a proper version of Sebastian Moran" - it kind of makes sense. We got the Anti-Sherlock with Moriarty, the Anti-Mycroft with Magnusson, I think it is time that we get the Anti-John. And that happens to be Moran.

 
That coukd work if Moran wasnt in jail and frankky didnt seem able to have a bigger role later. I havent read the canon and  I was thinking that there must be some enemy that is related somehow to Moriarty.
Anyway there are two Moriartys? I wonder if Janine could be a part of this plot. I am confused

Series Four Suggestions & Ideas » They never tell us how Sherlock faked his own death » March 11, 2014 11:10 pm

natal
Replies: 22

Go to post

Willow wrote:

natal wrote:

saturnR wrote:

I thought the theory he told Anderson was the real one.

 
I believe the same thing. I dont think that the production will bother with this anymore as I dont think that we ll see moriarty again.

Unless, of course, Moriarty had an identical twin; I do wonder whether the case involving the woman married to identical triplets was a small hint in this direction...
 

 
This could be an explanation regarding moriarty video at the end of season 3. I remember SH telling that it took him 2 year to get rid of M network, so I cant see how M can still be alive, for the same reason having a twin that SH or Mycroft isnt aware is something hard to believe but that belongs to another thread..

Series Four Suggestions & Ideas » They never tell us how Sherlock faked his own death » March 11, 2014 2:39 pm

natal
Replies: 22

Go to post

saturnR wrote:

I thought the theory he told Anderson was the real one.

 
I believe the same thing. I dont think that the production will bother with this anymore as I dont think that we ll see moriarty again.

The Sign of Three » Why did Sherlock leave the wedding early, looking so sad and dejected? » March 10, 2014 6:55 am

natal
Replies: 95

Go to post

SolarSystem wrote:

SusiGo wrote:

I think if you look closely at his face during the conversation with John and Mary and his move towards Janine before he realises she is dancing with someone else, you can see that there is more. No heartbreak, that would be saying far too much, but remember him telling Janine how much he loved to dance. He prepared for a waltz with her and did not get the opportunity. And he felt that he did not belong. 

I agree. He was looking for Janine and even almost took a step into her direction. And when he realised that she was dancing with this other guy, there is a very particular expression on his face for just a second, as if he were thinking "Ah, okay, fine. So everything back to normal now." And then everything slowly goes back to 'normal' again.
But the way in which he is shown in the middle of that dancing crowd is very telling, in my opinion. I can practically feel the loneliness, and even if it doesn't come as a real surprise to Sherlock... he still looks lonely there for a moment.
 

 
Couldnt agree more..

The Empty Hearse » The theory he told Anderson - The actual answer?? » March 10, 2014 6:43 am

natal
Replies: 445

Go to post

SherlocklivesinOH wrote:

And remember, the explanation could be real, and yet telling Anderson could be imaginary. 

I could see Sherlock withholding the answer from people like Anderson and Donovan, to drive them crazy. And from John because he likes to be mysterious to John.

 
Yes but this time talking to John didnt seem to joking around, he seemed pretty serious and to Anderson too. Thats why when A doesnt like his explanation SH does that grin with his face and leaves the room, I think he regrets telling the truth cause A dont believe him! Maybe then he thought he should tell something more... Fancy, to satisfy the expectations of a fan (like what happens exactly online!)


P.s. Sorry for my poor English (hello from greece :-)  )

The Empty Hearse » The theory he told Anderson - The actual answer?? » March 9, 2014 11:50 pm

natal
Replies: 445

Go to post

Well its pretty obvious to me.. After the second time I ve watched the episode I think the story he told Anderson is the true one. First its not like Sherlock making jokes or fool somebody like this' even if its Anderson , correct? Then when they are with Mary and Sherlock starts telling the story to John says exactly the same thing told Anderson (his brother knew it, molly, the homeless network etc) it fits perfect. We know  he was to tell the truth to John, so that must be the truth to our question. Also we have the talk with molly at the hospital, she knew, she helped him throwing the body so John could see it, she wasnt followed from a sniper. And it fits great as he says that everything was planned as we see snap shots from the time mycroft held moriarty and how they were expecting Moriarty to run after  Sherlock., so they were prepared. Mystery solved in that episode for me.

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum