BBC Sherlock Fan Forum - Serving Sherlockians since February 2012.


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



January 8, 2014 7:16 pm  #41


Re: Little Archie

I think that's a coincidence. Billy suits Archie's character.....little guy with a big curious and inquisitive mind...


I will NEVER fire a gun IN my mouth when I'm planning on Stayin Alive! http://cdn.boardhost.com/emoticons/devious.gif

The clue that everyone missed?

http://24.media.tumblr.com/6dc8e291b4cf352fceb1d34759d3de63/tumblr_mmrgjhabnZ1rvzxbzo6_500.gif
 

January 8, 2014 7:23 pm  #42


Re: Little Archie

The Adventure of the Mazarin Stone:


"That will do, Billy," said he. "You were in danger of your life then, my boy, and I can't do without you just yet. Well, Watson, it is good to see you in your old quarters once again. You come at a critical moment."

"So I gather."

"You can go, Billy. That boy is a problem, Watson. How far am I justified in allowing him to be in danger?"

"Danger of what, Holmes?"

"Of sudden death. I'm expecting something this evening."

"Expecting what?"

"To be murdered, Watson."
 


I will NEVER fire a gun IN my mouth when I'm planning on Stayin Alive! http://cdn.boardhost.com/emoticons/devious.gif

The clue that everyone missed?

http://24.media.tumblr.com/6dc8e291b4cf352fceb1d34759d3de63/tumblr_mmrgjhabnZ1rvzxbzo6_500.gif
 

January 9, 2014 1:53 am  #43


Re: Little Archie

Archie was great.  I was curious as to why the writers chose "Archie" for the name of the character so I looked it up online.  Interestingly, Archie means: Genuine, bold, brave.  I wonder if there's any significance to that, then?  The description certainly fits Sherlock, imo.  I don't know the canon much so if the name was a reference to someone in a story, it totally went by me.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing.  -- Helen Keller
 

January 9, 2014 9:57 am  #44


Re: Little Archie

Still haven't seen the episode but just by reading your posts about Sherlock being a bit childish, him mentioning himself being the child between John and Mary and his behaviour towards Archie I'd like to talk about my impression:

Sherlock often behaves a bit childish and playful. He is aware of that and it's a consequence of his way of thinking and living in his world.
It has nothing to do with naivete or being silly. It might be a result of his feeling on a wrong planet sometimes. And more so because he doesn't take things too seriously to distance himself and avoid prejudice and bias.
Take the hat. It is in fact just a hat without any additional meaning. A cap with earflaps. The next step of thinking is to give it an addtional meaning. Death frisbee. You can only do that if you don't think of Victorian London and Holmes in a deer stalker.

If you are able to look at things like a child it gives you another perspective. A child sees a maggot and there is no conception of death and sorrow or mourning, fear and whatever people think and usually imply.
A child without any knowledge about maggots and emotional "baggage" can just see them and the child's reaction is "cool".

Usually people lose this ability to see things like a child. They learn to know the social meaning and emotional background and it burdens them and hinder their conception.

In Buddhist or Zen thinking you may learn to really look at things without too much background emotions. It's not that you have no concept of the social meaning but you try another maybe advanced way of thinking and perception.

 

January 9, 2014 10:09 am  #45


Re: Little Archie

Another point might be that Sherlock is IMO seen through John's eyes in the third series. On the one hand he likes to feel cared for (who doesn't) but John regains a bit self respect and can psychologically speaking get the upper hand sometimes. Humanises Sherlock.
In Johnlock words the "child" undertones can even be a save place for John to be and see Sherlock in. No grown man, no danger place to go and maybe acknowledge his feelings for a man (if there are any).

 

January 9, 2014 10:25 am  #46


Re: Little Archie

Sherlock Holmes does have childish elements indeed. In a very interesting interview, Jeremy Brett discussed the popularity of Holmes among children. He said: "And I think I know why the children love him and that’s because Sir Arthur Conan Doyle endowed Holmes with all the sensibilities of a child – up to the age of eight. Then, at the age of eight, of course you’re told not to look out of the window, umm, get on with your Latin syntax, and they begin to diminish those extra senses. Holmes has them."


 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"The world is big enough for us, no ghosts need apply"

 
 

January 9, 2014 10:30 am  #47


Re: Little Archie

I think it is more the other way around...we did see Sherlock through John's eyes in the first two seasons. Now we see John through Sherlock's eyes.

 

January 9, 2014 10:53 am  #48


Re: Little Archie

Jacco111 wrote:

Sherlock Holmes does have childish elements indeed. In a very interesting interview, Jeremy Brett discussed the popularity of Holmes among children. He said: "And I think I know why the children love him and that’s because Sir Arthur Conan Doyle endowed Holmes with all the sensibilities of a child – up to the age of eight. Then, at the age of eight, of course you’re told not to look out of the window, umm, get on with your Latin syntax, and they begin to diminish those extra senses. Holmes has them."

That's an interesting theory. I was about 8 years when I started reading the Sherlock Holmes stuff.


-----------------------------
“Why do you go away? So that you can come back. So that you can see the place you came from with new eyes and extra colors. And the people there see you differently, too. Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving.”
Terry Pratchett - A Hat Full of Sky
 

January 9, 2014 10:56 am  #49


Re: Little Archie

So was I, Criosdan.


 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"The world is big enough for us, no ghosts need apply"

 
 

January 10, 2014 12:16 am  #50


Re: Little Archie

Archie basically solved the case.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eventually everyone will support Johnlock.

Independent OSAJ Affiliate

http://9.asset.soup.io/asset/1715/0057_6c7d.gif
 

January 10, 2014 6:08 pm  #51


Re: Little Archie

From the start of the first scene with Archie, he and Sherlock seem to be having a staring contest or who will break first contest. To me it seems that little Archie did not want to wear what was expected of him and could not be trusted to speak or act as expected. Since he is a little 'different' it was thought that, perhaps, Sherlock (very similar is many ways) should be the one to talk to him about the wedding.

Archie seems to be a miniature Sherlock in many ways, perhaps just what Sherlock himself was like at that age. Sherlock sees himself in the child, the child sees himself in Sherlock, that is why they get on well. That is why Sherlock asks Archie for the solution later at the wedding.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't make people into heroes John. Heroes don't exist and if they did I wouldn't be one of them.
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mdq1pcLCUR1rs9hrro1_500.jpg
 

January 10, 2014 8:38 pm  #52


Re: Little Archie

Perhaps Sherlock does get along well with children in general...after all, children tend to be more open-minded than adults, and they usually appreciate it if someone takes what they say serious (and I bet, Sherlock would even get clues from the seemingly nonsensical stuff they say, and therefore listening closely to their opinions).

 

February 28, 2014 10:38 pm  #53


Re: Little Archie

Westwood! wrote:

I love little Archie!! I think Sherlock would be great with children because he treats them as grown ups and they understand that! I would like to see him with mary and john's baby but I have a bad feeling about His last vow..Anyway in the original books he goes along well with homeless children!

I think a big part of the Archie thing was showing how good Sherlock could be with children, in part because of his own child-like-ness (which would be consistent with Asperger's).

Sherlock: Grown-ups like that sort of thing.
Archie: Why?
Sherlock: I don't know, I'll ask one. (Subtext: I'm not one myself.)

This scene made me believe that part of why Sherlock shows he will do anything to protect Mary is that he wants to protect Baby Watson. (Assuming the baby IS a Watson.)

But in this episode we see both that he loves John and that he likes children, so I begin to believe he will care a lot about a child that is part John Watson, so to speak.

And yes, Archie could be the modern equivalent of a Baker Street Irregular, but I thought that was the Homeless Network?

 

February 28, 2014 10:40 pm  #54


Re: Little Archie

It is.
Archie is the wrong class.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

August 10, 2014 5:55 am  #55


Re: Little Archie

“I remember being a 12-year-old kid thinking, Oh, why didn’t we see Sherlock be the best man? Please, can we see that? That would be the best story in the whole world, and I don’t care if there’s a crime in it or not, because it must have been the best and worst speech of all time!”  (Steven Moffat)

I don't think Archie is so much a mini-Sherlock as a mini Steven!  It seems odd that a 12 year old would be particularly interested in seeing a wedding, but of course this was a 12 year old writer who was fascinated by Sherlock.  I thought it was funny that he went on to write the speech that he'd wanted to see at 12 (also kind of funny that he misses out the actual wedding altogether and turns the speech into the main event!).  I do think Archie is Steven as a child, actually getting to be there and watching the speech that he'd wanted to see.  Archie/Steven gets to have some one-to-one with Sherlock, looking at excitingly gory pictures together, gets to hug him and even helps him solve a case!  It's a sweet little bit of wish fulfilment. 

Last edited by Liberty (August 10, 2014 2:38 pm)

 

August 10, 2014 11:24 am  #56


Re: Little Archie

Liberty, very insightful!  I think you may be right. 

I did not especially like HLV as I think Sherlock behaved enormously out of character. (Prancing between the tables and slapping himself?  It felt like an entirely different show.)  It struck me as very self-indulgent on the part of the writers, so your quote from  Moffatt makes a lot off sense, and actually makes me like the show a little better.  I just read Moffatt's whole comment, and now I'll have to rewatch the episode.

BTW, was the little Archie actor a Moffatt?  Steven uses his son a couple of times in the show, once as the voice of the child in TGG, and as young Sherlock in HLV.  Little Archie looks a LOT like the young Sherlock in HLV.

Last edited by Sherlockismyfix (August 10, 2014 11:25 am)


____________________________________
I had bad days!


 
 

August 10, 2014 11:36 am  #57


Re: Little Archie

No it's Louis Moffat in both instances you mentioned, but Archie in not related in any way.
I wish I could remember the  Brit TV ad he is currently in...


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://professorfangirl.tumblr.com/post/105838327464/heres-an-outtake-of-mark-gatiss-on-the
 

August 10, 2014 11:54 am  #58


Re: Little Archie

I think Archie deserves his own spin off show!


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proud President and Founder of the OSAJ.  
Honorary German   http://cdn.boardhost.com/emoticons/grin.gif
"Anyone who takes himself too seriously always runs the risk of looking ridiculous; anyone who can consistently laugh at himself does not".
 -Vaclav Havel 
"Life is full of wonder, Love is never wrong."   Melissa Ethridge

I ship it harder than Mrs. Hudson.
http://media-cache-ec3.pinimg.com/736x/aa/2b/35/aa2b352725f4c944599a3ea17cbfe44e.jpg    https://31.media.tumblr.com/bb0f8896a79d19602eeaea0254ff5ccd/tumblr_n5ztxjGDB61stgn3no1_500.jpg
 
 

August 10, 2014 12:33 pm  #59


Re: Little Archie

tonnaree wrote:

I think Archie deserves his own spin off show!

 
I agree!  I would totally watch this!


____________________________________
I had bad days!


 
 

November 29, 2014 8:52 am  #60


Re: Little Archie

I feel like the authors are taunting us with Archie. They're trying to give us Sherlock's backstory, without actually giving us Sherlock's backstory. I agree with many of the comments above: Sherlock treats Archie with the same dignity and respect he wished to have been treated with when he was a child. Now we have a small group of "Sherlocks" forming within the television show: Billy, Archie, and of course Sherlock himself. Both Billy and Archie are typical people off the streets who possess an amazing mind like Sherlock. Maybe Mofftiss is trying to  humanize Sherlock?


"In 900 years of time and space, I've never met anyone who wasnt important" -Eleventh Doctor 

"Sentiment is a chemical defect found in the losing side" -Sherlock
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum